| sergio-br2 | hello | 00:32 |
|---|---|---|
| sergio-br2 | someone get nvidia-331 work after install? It seems that both Optimus hardware and only one nvidia card have problem with this driver | 00:33 |
| sergio-br2 | *I'm in trusty, and get problem in 2 different machines | 00:34 |
| === LoganCloud is now known as Guest24574 | ||
| Fudge | damo if icc-profiles is running with a pid try ubuntu-bug pid-number | 03:34 |
| ThomasB | i need my rhythmbox to support last.fm :( | 03:59 |
| === jje is now known as Guest76040 | ||
| === Guest76040 is now known as jje | ||
| pcwhite | ns identify Becky010 | 15:30 |
| glitsj16 | mp to 14.04, had issues also with 13.10 | 16:45 |
| kaimast | hey all! my laptop has two batteries. is it possible to merge the estimated remaining time of battery life? It shows them seperatley which is not very intuitive | 18:11 |
| trism | kaimast: bug 880881 | 18:13 |
| ubottu | bug 880881 in indicator-power (Ubuntu) "Power indicator does not combine multiple battery status" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/880881 | 18:13 |
| kaimast | thanks trism! | 18:14 |
| * penguin42 wonders whether it can tell that the two batteries are a related pair | 18:38 | |
| kaimast | penguin42: i think the easiest solution would be to add an option to merge the times. | 18:41 |
| penguin42 | nod | 18:42 |
| === soee_ is now known as soee | ||
| karab44 | hello | 19:28 |
| karab44 | how is the progress on 14.04? How will it change til official release? Can I install it for daily usage? | 19:29 |
| holstein | karab44: you "can".. its not out yet, and should not be considered released til its released.. | 19:30 |
| k1l_ | karab44: if you need to ask about stableness, dont use alpha or betas | 19:32 |
| k1l_ | and yes, a alpha/beta will update to final automaticaly | 19:32 |
| karab44 | Yeah I know but I was just wondering how will it work for me when I use application mostly | 19:33 |
| shapow | hi, with regard to karab44's question does ubuntu+1 compare to arch linux? | 19:33 |
| holstein | shapow: they are different products.. neither are tring to compare to the other. arch is a rolling release.. ubuntu 14.04 is a testing verison til its release in april | 19:34 |
| k1l_ | shapow: arch is rolling release. that is quite hard to compare | 19:34 |
| karab44 | So my question would be will system behaviour be stable in daily usage of apps like IRC, Blender, skype. I usually don't use system features much. | 19:35 |
| shapow | it was to my understanding ubuntu+1 was the always-developmental version of ubuntu (aka rolling release) but according to holstein and k1l_ this is not so? | 19:35 |
| karab44 | shapow: seems to be :) | 19:35 |
| penguin42 | karab44: It's not too bad; but things do break from time to time - because things can and will break prior to release | 19:35 |
| k1l_ | karab44: that is not the question. a "stable IRC program" doesnt help you if the kernel or the xserver doesnt run | 19:36 |
| holstein | karab44: if you want stable, use the stable release | 19:36 |
| Beldar | shapow, Rolling release no. | 19:36 |
| penguin42 | karab44: But unlike Arch for example, Ubuntu tends to keep the last few kernels installed on the machine, so at least if the kernel breaks it's easy to go back | 19:36 |
| holstein | shapow: correct, it is *not* a rolling release | 19:36 |
| k1l_ | karab44: things will break. and most times when you need a running system to do important things. so again: if you need to ask the questions, stay away from development | 19:36 |
| k1l_ | shapow: no its not rolling release. but +1 is always called the actual development release | 19:37 |
| karab44 | I thought it's not that drastic :) | 19:37 |
| karab44 | My idea was to use it carefully without using any fancy system features but only launch apps on it but I see now that it's not good idea either. | 19:38 |
| penguin42 | karab44: Things like compilers, kernel etc have to get updated somewhere in the cycle, so it does happen - but then as it gets closer to release things stabilise out; current one should be a little better because it's aiming at LTS so it shouldn't be quite as drastic | 19:39 |
| holstein | karab44: ? its not a "bad" idea.. its just not a stable release.. its not the goal of 14.04 right now to make sure it doesnt break.. | 19:39 |
| shapow | thank you all ^^ | 19:39 |
| holstein | shapow: the testing version of ubuntu doesnt necessarily have the latest packages. its not pulling from the latest testing version of debian, which could be viewed as "rolling" | 19:40 |
| karab44 | but you said it can break "just like that" and I don't want my system breaks just because mp3 player runs in background. | 19:41 |
| === lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone | ||
| YOURBESTFRIEND | hello | 22:39 |
| Beldar | YOURBESTFRIEND, What's up? | 22:45 |
| FernandoMiguel | nice nick | 22:46 |
| YOURBESTFRIEND | Beldar: trying to fix some bug, yo | 23:07 |
| user82 | hi. does the trusty installer support installing the system to F2FS partitions? | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!