[14:47] hi rick_h_ [14:47] bac: howdcy [14:48] rick_h_: you got a sec for a quick call wrt charm proof and subordinate charms? [14:48] sure thing [14:49] bac: your link or mine? [14:49] rick_h_: daily hangout? [14:49] sure [14:53] _o/ [15:02] buh bye [15:03] rick_h_: that's ok. i think we were done. thanks a ton. [15:03] np, all good [15:17] frankban: how does the file:/// support in the charm work? Do we use that for anything? [15:17] frankban: usually we drop the file in locally and build the charm correct? this would be for manually putting the file on a deployed charm and then specifying the config and picking it up? [15:18] frankban: and if you can copy the file to the deployed charm then you can just copy it to the releases directory and set the version string? [15:20] rick_h_: I think that options was used to deploy the charm behind a firewall. Now the charm is able to do that without workarounds [15:20] frankban: cool [15:20] rick_h_: see "Deploying behind a firewall" in the readme [15:50] jujugui call in 10 [15:58] jujugui call in 1 [15:58] 2 [15:58] Pick a number. [15:58] 2 [15:58] \o/ [15:58] We have a winner! [16:04] Makyo: yes, you should sleep [16:04] frankban: can you join back on the call for a couple of min if you have a sec? [16:04] sleep is gooooood [16:10] rick_h_: url? [16:10] https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/calendar/Z2FyeS5wb3N0ZXJAY2Fub25pY2FsLmNvbQ.j0rk5d371ph8331ijtf48t2uj0 [16:27] Makyo: could you please take a look at https://codereview.appspot.com/51520043 ? [16:27] frankban, on it [16:28] thanks! [16:43] frankban: can you look at the log fix really quick please? https://codereview.appspot.com/51280047 [16:44] rick_h_: sure [16:49] rick_h_: done [16:49] frankban: thanks [16:49] frankban, can't log into rietveld for some reason. Code lgtm, but maybe 'test_runs_once' or something instead of 'test_runned_once'? Will QA now. [16:50] Makyo: aargh, sounds good, thanks [17:13] frankban, QA okay. Will figure out why I can't get to RV soon. [17:14] Makyo: cool [17:36] rick_h_: can you easily reproduce the "Exodus index "charms_pending_019" does not exist." issue? I want to to try something if so. If not you have to watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmCJEehYtU [17:38] benji: sec, getting into that lxc [17:40] benji: ok, yes. If I ./scripts/reset-db and then bin/migrations upgrade I get the error [17:40] and the video was interesting [17:40] rick_h_: great, try this: [17:41] bin/migrations prepare-upgrade --init && bin/migrations upgrade [17:41] benji: Updated the datastore to version: 23 [17:41] rick_h_: I guess I'm done then. :) [17:41] benji: heh, I'd suggest we add back the migrations make file targets then to help with this stuff [17:41] (other than writing this down in a place that will mean we don't waste hours figuring out next time) [17:42] +1 [17:42] benji: it used to be that we used to have a make upgrade and such [17:42] I'm not sure why they were removed, but I think that's part of what led to this. As you noted, not much to help figure out the 'right' way to run this exodus stuff [17:42] rick_h_: as your reward you get this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgD5p1XiVT0 [17:43] * rick_h_ completely doesn't know what's up with this royals thing [17:43] * benji predicts youtube links will be the debits/credits of the future [17:43] :) [17:55] rick_h_, aha! [17:55] so it ends up you pretty format markdown bullets in the readme but not in the description [17:55] I'll file a bug, it's not like the end of the world, more like a papercut [17:55] jcastro: ah, the readme is a file. We process that whole file [17:55] there's no way in the descrip;tion to know if it's markdown or not [17:55] the description is in metadata.yaml [17:55] oh I see [17:55] ok, so nm then I guess [17:55] with the readme we check the file extension [17:55] * jcastro nods [17:57] we can see if it does any 'harm' to render markdown. I'm not sure tbh. I'd have to test it out on a bunch of descriptions [17:57] even though, summary I think would be bigger/more markdown-y [17:57] actually, nvm, that's not true any more is it [17:57] yeah, but like I am sure you have way more important stuff [17:58] let's leave this for "some minor point release to be determined at some point in the future." [17:58] rgr [17:58] don't tell alejandra, maybe she won't notice it. :p [17:59] rick_h_, now as far as quickstart/deployer not doing relations because some of the units didn't come up (from friday), who do I talk to about that? [17:59] that's how deployer works? so hazmat maybe? [18:00] I'm not sure if there's some good reason it does that down into juju that can be addressed by someone else [20:00] rick_h_: remember when we had to fork charmtools to get it to use proof on 'localhost'? ugh, just bit me. [20:01] rick_h_: i may have a way around having to fork, now. [20:01] bac: yay? [20:41] jcastro, yeah.. deployer will stop if things can't even install/start without error [21:37] rick_h_ or benji: at your convenience could one of you review https://codereview.appspot.com/51650043 [21:37] ? [22:00] Morning [23:04] bac: can look in the morning