[01:51] <doko> infinity, cjwatson: please could you overwrite gcc-4.8's aspcud's autopkgtest?
[02:11] <doko> filed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735138
[02:11] <ubot2> Debian bug 735138 in aspcud "autopkg test always failing" [Serious,Open]
[02:11] <doko> jibel ^^^
[04:47] <infinity> doko: Done.
[08:32] <tjaalton> would be nice to get that ^ accepted
[15:18] <mlankhorst> cjwatson: ^
[17:10] <robru> cjwatson, so I got that MIR approved for dee-qt and gsettings-qt, but hud is still blocked in -proposed. can you take a look at that and help me understand how to fix it?
[17:11] <cjwatson> robru: looking
[17:13] <cjwatson> robru: hmph, so dee-qt and gsettings-qt both build-depend either directly or indirectly on qtdeclarative, which won't stand a chance of building on non-x86/armhf until Qt 5.2
[17:13] <robru> cjwatson, hmmmm, so can we get some kind of manual exception to unblock hud for now, with the understanding that qt5.2 will fix things later?
[17:14] <cjwatson> robru: so let me see what I need to tear out to remove hud on the affected architectures
[17:14] <cjwatson> not a manual exception, but binary removal
[17:14] <robru> cjwatson, ok, great, thanks
[17:17] <cjwatson> Looks like the only relevant rdep is indicator-appmenu (arm64/powerpc)
[17:21] <cjwatson> robru: removed now, with any luck that'll work after the next publisher cycle
[17:21] <robru> cjwatson, ok, sorry, does that mean you want me to upload a new build? or will it sort itself out?
[17:22] <cjwatson> robru: it should sort itself out.  new build would be counterproductive
[17:22] <robru> cjwatson, ok, thanks again
[17:49] <infinity> cjwatson: How far off are we from turning off PROPOSED for precise dailies?
[17:49] <infinity> cjwatson: I want to start copying in SRU kernels for the next cadence, but obviously not before that switch is flipped.
[17:51] <cjwatson> infinity: checklist says release minus 7 days, so it's a while yet
[17:53] <infinity> cjwatson: The checklist is malleable. :P
[17:53] <infinity> (Was more a question of "how much more stuff needs to be promoted")
[18:05] <cjwatson> infinity: there's at least a couple more X updates from today, and maybe fixing up this nvidia stuff; also a question of a grub2 change that I haven't looked into yet
[18:19] <doko> infinity, cjwatson, stgraber, slangasek; the new queue has some unreviewed source packages since mid december. are these hold back for a reason?
[18:20] <infinity> I'll take the wine ones.
[18:22] <slangasek> infinity: that seems to not be an answer to his question? :)
[18:23] <infinity> Nope.
[18:23] <slangasek> I don't know of a reason those have been skipped
[18:23] <doko> well, it's a partial answer =)
[18:23] <cjwatson> I know of nothing held back for a reason; if there was a reason it probably should have been rejected
[18:23] <infinity> I think the answer is "people had other stuff to do".
[18:23] <slangasek> infinity: other stuff like queue jumping in favor of wine, apparently :)
[18:34] <cjwatson> robru: hud seems to be in now
[18:36] <robru> cjwatson, thanks a ton!