[03:54] <jarkko> well i heard that you usually decide about mesa packages, i think you should push a newer version of mesa 
[05:04] <tjaalton> because the latest upstream release is not enough?
[07:22] <tjaalton> huh, why does lts-pkg-rename remove patches?
[07:22] <tjaalton> mlankhorst: ^
[07:27] <tomreyn> i'm using r300 mesa drivers on ubuntu 13.10 x86_64, and would like to use AMD CodeXL (the artist formerly known as gDEBugger), but it *really* wants to find libOpenCL.so. is there any easy way to get one which it might not make it crash? i don't care about opencl really, just need opengl debugging.
[08:00] <mlankhorst> morning
[08:01] <mlankhorst> tjaalton: it should only remove xmir
[08:01] <mlankhorst> because xmir is not enabled
[08:02] <mlankhorst> and I don't trust that the !xmir case of the xmir patch is tested well enough :P
[08:04] <tjaalton> series is reset
[08:04] <mlankhorst> erm I fixed that
[08:04] <mlankhorst> what package is affected?
[08:04] <tjaalton> I'm on revno 530
[08:04] <tjaalton> -intel
[08:05] <tjaalton> check ubuntu-saucy
[08:05] <mlankhorst> ah right, I didn't push it
[08:05] <tjaalton> also, probably not wise to remove the patch
[08:05] <tjaalton> but just drop from series
[08:05] <tjaalton> diff is smaller then
[08:05] <tjaalton> diff to saucy
[08:06] <mlankhorst> ok pushed 531, which is what I used
[08:14] <tjaalton> hmm so if the current backport doesn't have the xmir patch on the diff, then this one won't either
[08:17] <mlankhorst> yeah, affected were xorg-server, xxv-nouveau/ati/intel. And if you accidentally drop all the patches in xorg-server you're going to have a bad time. ;-)
[08:17] <tjaalton> yep remember that now :)
[08:27] <tjaalton> huh, every upload goes via NEW?
[08:27] <tjaalton> backport upload, even if a version is there already
[09:01] <mlankhorst> yes
[09:02] <mlankhorst> except if there is a version in -proposed
[09:08] <mlankhorst> it doesn't consider -updates
=== ara is now known as Guest58013