slangasek | well, that's interesting; I wound up with a corrupted /boot/grub/grub.cfg on last reboot. remarkable that it managed to boot at all | 00:47 |
---|---|---|
slangasek | (noticed the corruption because suddenly, memtest86 was the first boot option) | 00:48 |
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
tjaalton | there's a xserver-xorg-video-intel for saucy-proposed waiting for approval, while the -lts-saucy copy got accepted | 08:11 |
sergiusens | infinity, can goget-ubuntu-touch be unblocked from proposed? | 16:04 |
cjwatson | I suggest not picking random victims for that kind of question | 16:07 |
sergiusens | sorry | 16:08 |
cjwatson | Hm. So this is explicitly relying on multiarch in order to work? | 16:08 |
sergiusens | cjwatson, I need the emulator runtime; which we only have for x86 platforms | 16:09 |
cjwatson | In short, "yes" | 16:09 |
* sergiusens takes note :-) | 16:10 | |
cjwatson | Looks like it has the correct multiarch metadata, so it just needs a FauxPackages entry because proposed-migration isn't smart enough to notice that on its own | 16:10 |
cjwatson | Is this really going to work on armhf? Won't that end up invoking nested qemu? | 16:11 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/britney1-ubuntu/revision/220 will hopefully clear this up, but as I say it seems questionable on armhf | 16:14 |
sergiusens | cjwatson, it won't won't work on armhf afaik | 16:16 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: Why's it built on armhf then? | 16:19 |
mlankhorst | argh | 16:22 |
sergiusens | cjwatson, should I change the packaging to only provide that bin package on x86 only? | 16:22 |
sergiusens | the other bin packages should work on non x86 | 16:23 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: I think so | 16:25 |
mlankhorst | turns out that I forgot to re-upload xxv-nouveau again when I found out that all patches were unapplied | 16:27 |
mlankhorst | that explains the tearing.. | 16:27 |
sergiusens | cjwatson, I'll make the change then; thanks | 16:31 |
mlankhorst | cjwatson: can you accept xxv-nouveau-ltss? missed it when I fixed up the fallout from empty patches | 16:51 |
cjwatson | looking | 16:54 |
cjwatson | done | 16:57 |
mlankhorst | thanks | 16:58 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: (goget-ubuntu-touch got migrated in the meantime, btw) | 16:58 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: let me know when you've made that packaging change, as I should probably drop the fauxpackages entry for armhf when you do | 16:59 |
sergiusens | sure, thanks | 16:59 |
sergiusens | cjwatson, it should be safe to drop now though, right? The next package should have the proper architectures | 17:04 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: sure | 17:11 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: I mean, I guess. I'll probably wait though | 17:11 |
cjwatson | sergiusens: I prefer not to make things uninstallable when I don't need to | 17:11 |
infinity | jibel: Can we do anything about the linux autopkgtest hatred? Looks entirely testbed-related. | 21:02 |
doko | infinity, do you plan an eglibc upload? if not I'd like to fix the ruby2.0 ftbfs for armhf | 21:47 |
infinity | doko: I saw that commit, was going to pull and test it. | 21:47 |
doko | infinity, there are two in the bug report | 21:48 |
infinity | doko: Assuming you were referring to 2f10c4d6901e7a4c4ad294cc5bb8ece6547f4f62 | 21:48 |
infinity | Ahh, and 41bc5e09352ca838e1787f3109dcf4b4ae85986a | 21:49 |
infinity | Sure, I'll pull both of those for Debian as well. | 21:49 |
infinity | doko: In exchange, can you switch gcc-defaults on Debian/powerpc to 4.8 for me? | 21:50 |
doko | wrong channel | 21:50 |
infinity | Yeah, I know. :P | 21:50 |
doko | if you tell me why ptrace isn't instrumented in libasan on powerpc | 21:51 |
doko | this is gcc-4.9 | 21:51 |
infinity | doko: Pulled one extra patch from Will in that round, and committed to both Debian and Ubuntu. | 22:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!