[00:48] <DarkPlayer> wgrant: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/162825128/buildlog.txt.gz this problem still occurs
[06:32] <marnold> question is all of lp open source now including the PPA service
[06:39] <wgrant> DarkPlayer: Hrm, but only intermittently.
[06:39] <wgrant> marnold: Yes
[06:39] <wgrant> It's all open source nowadays.
[06:40] <marnold> sweet i don't suppose there's a prebuilt vmware appliance somewhere
[06:41] <wgrant> There isn't. It's a fairly challenging system to run and keep running.
[06:43] <marnold> I need a PPA-like system for maintaining a custom version of Ubuntu
[06:43] <marnold> it's my personal remix with all the stuff to manage my neurological condition
[06:44] <wgrant> You can't just use a PPA on Launchpad.net?
[06:44] <wgrant> Running an entire separate Launchpad instance is no small undertaking, unfortunately.
[06:44] <marnold> I'm wondering if i can
[06:44] <marnold> but there's some binary blobs
[06:45] <marnold> that need to be in
[06:45] <marnold> with pre-entered license keys and the like
[06:45] <marnold> and cost is a factor
[06:47] <wgrant> Have you considered just manually maintaining a local repository with a tool like reprepro?
[06:47] <marnold> so I'm just looking at options
[06:47] <marnold> that's what I've been doing
[06:47] <wgrant> Launchpad's *possible* to run locally, but it's fairly challenging and probably total overkill for your purposes.
[06:48] <marnold> but it's looking like I'm going to have to do 12.04 and 14.04 in parrell
[06:49] <marnold> I was stuck on dapper until like it's end of life
[06:49] <marnold> don't want to do that again
[06:50] <marnold> so lp is out
[06:50] <marnold> next stop google
[06:50] <wgrant> Heh
[06:50] <wgrant> Why can't you continue using reprepro?
[06:53] <marnold> autobuilds for two different distros at the same time
[06:53] <wgrant> That's easy with a tool like sbuild or pbuilder
[06:53] <wgrant> Then throw the binaries from that into reprepro
[06:53] <wgrant> Done :)
[06:54] <marnold> ok I'll look at my config files and hook scripts and see if i can hack stuff together
[06:55] <marnold> again
[06:55] <marnold> I might just publish the open stuff as a remix
[06:56] <marnold> and keep all the crazy kernel stuff in private repos
[06:57] <marnold> there's bound to be someone who likes the old brown theme, on MATE :)
[06:58] <marnold> thanks for the advice
[06:58] <wgrant> Hopefully you'll find a good solution.
[07:00] <marnold> I know I will  always do
[07:01] <marnold> the one thing that's hard though is giving back
[07:01] <marnold> I tried once had to stop due to a fall down a flight of stairs
[07:02] <marnold> long off topic story
[19:33] <DarkPlayer> hi, is it possible to mark an attachment as private without making the whole bug report private?
[19:35] <teward> DarkPlayer, not that I know of.  If the attachment is private though, then the bug probably should be, or you shouldn't be uploading private attachments.
[22:08] <pinacolada> Quick question: To assign a blueprint of an application to myself, do I need to be a member of the application drivers, maintainers or both? Thanks!