[10:40] <xnox> cjwatson: gobject-based C library -> so not using vala?
[10:51] <cjwatson> xnox: no
[10:52] <cjwatson> xnox: mostly because I don't know it (yet), TBH
[10:52] <cjwatson> xnox: but also wasn't sure how bindings to a library written in vala would work
[10:54] <xnox> cjwatson: fair enough =) i remember pitti to advocate it a lot for "g-object libraries" due to removing G_OBJECT_* type-system boiler-plate and easier memory management. Probably not enough benefit alone to learn C# syntax just for this project.
[10:55] <cjwatson> I would like to learn it at some point, certainly, but didn't want to bloat the critical path too much ...
[21:01] <pitti> stgraber, mdeslaur, kees, stgraber: TB meeting?
[21:02] <pitti> not that we'd have much of an agenda
[21:03]  * pitti certainly is glad that "discuss init system" isn't on it :-P
[21:03] <mdeslaur> \o
[21:03] <mdeslaur> pitti: hehe :)
[21:04]  * stgraber waves
[21:04] <mdeslaur> hrm, infinity was supposed to chair
[21:05] <pitti> well, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda doesn't have much anyway
[21:05]  * mdeslaur nods
[21:05] <pitti> kees was leading the MRE review, and he's celebrating MLK
[21:06] <pitti> stgraber, mdeslaur: do you have anything to discuss?
[21:06] <mdeslaur> not me, no
[21:08] <mdeslaur> pitti, stgraber: shall we cancel?
[21:08] <pitti> WFM
[21:09] <pitti> so, "see" you in two weeks
[21:09] <pitti> bumped the date on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda
[21:09] <mdeslaur> great, thanks
[21:09]  * mdeslaur waves
[21:11] <stgraber> nothing to discuss, happy to skip
[21:11] <pitti> so, good night!