| RAOF | bdmurray: I'm looking at your whoopsie upload, and am confused. | 00:11 |
|---|---|---|
| bdmurray | RAOF: okay | 00:13 |
| bdmurray | RAOF: initialize_logging didn't exist and I thought the other things in the upload were "obviously safe patch"es | 00:15 |
| bdmurray | RAOF: I can remove everything but the logging change if you'd prefer | 00:17 |
| RAOF | I'm happy with all of them being in there, but just documented :) | 00:17 |
| bdmurray | when you say documented do you want a bug for every issue or just noted in the changelog? | 00:18 |
| RAOF | Noted in the changelog is OK. Does the connection_data.callback() thing want a bug, though? | 00:18 |
| bdmurray | I'll remove that bit as its not relevant to fixing the bug at hand | 00:19 |
| RAOF | That's not a trivially obvious change, at least to me :). It looks like a call gets made that previously wouldn't be made. | 00:19 |
| RAOF | Heh. Cool. | 00:19 |
| tumbleweed | looks like some NBS binaries need to be removed for chef to migrate | 06:46 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| jamespage | RAOF, the ceph i386 ftbfs was something transitory - no error in log - rebuilt OK | 09:57 |
| jamespage | RAOF, uploaded 2.2 again with the 2.1 entry in the changes file as well | 09:57 |
| jpds | Could someone move strongswan out of trusty-proposed for me? | 10:58 |
| Laney | Did you see the issues on update_excuses? | 11:03 |
| cjwatson | Hm, I guess that's an NBS-in-proposed thing | 11:16 |
| cjwatson | Looking | 11:16 |
| Laney | The uninstallables are genuine afaics | 11:18 |
| cjwatson | Yeah | 11:20 |
| cjwatson | No strongswan-plugins-fips-prf | 11:20 |
| Laney | s/plugins/plugin/ | 11:20 |
| Laney | jpds: ↑ | 11:20 |
| jpds | sigh. | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | tumbleweed: chef> yes, you're right. done | 11:22 |
| jpds | Laney / cjwatson: Thanks, fixed it. | 11:23 |
| cjwatson | I've dealt with the NBS part of it, anyway | 11:23 |
| Laney | ta | 11:23 |
| tumbleweed | cjwatson: thanks | 11:24 |
| jpds | Just uploaded -0ubuntu2. | 11:24 |
| didrocks | ogra_: sil2100: I'm blocking libcolumbus and hud into proposed. Seems that libcolumbus was built and published without any new commit :/ Not sure who checked… | 13:11 |
| didrocks | so it would make the tests refailing | 13:11 |
| * sil2100 sighs | 13:12 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: it was usermetrics | 13:12 |
| sil2100 | So why was it set to ready to release? | 13:12 |
| didrocks | see landing plan | 13:12 |
| sil2100 | Aw shit | 13:12 |
| didrocks | not libcolumbus | 13:12 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: right, I read your ping on #ubuntu-desktop and published that ;p | 13:13 |
| * sil2100 sighs and facepalms on himself | 13:13 | |
| didrocks | sil2100: well, I can't remember everything, especially when having 6 pings at the same time, would have been nice as it's written on the spreadsheet to check | 13:13 |
| didrocks | (and the check that things were published :p) | 13:13 |
| sil2100 | didrocks: shorry ;< Damn, I feel stupid now | 13:13 |
| didrocks | sil2100: well, no worry, just republish the right one now | 13:14 |
| didrocks | sil2100: no need for a block, both will stay in proposed until alpha2 is done | 13:14 |
| didrocks | (it was just in case we missed a merged branch) | 13:14 |
| xnox | queuebot Unapproved: partman-crypto (precise-proposed/main) [50ubuntu1 => 50ubuntu2] | 13:45 |
| xnox | please review ^ as it's wanted for 12.04.4, security team request bug #1263740 | 13:46 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1263740 in partman-crypto (Ubuntu Precise) "12.04.4 alternate installer encryption should default to aes-xts-plain64" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1263740 | 13:46 |
| xnox | verified to work with dalies against HWE & stock (.0) kernels | 13:46 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, do you know of a way to get more debugging from debootstrap under live-build ? using "lb build --debug" only gets me lb debug output (i still have the "cannot mount /proc" issue even when using BuildLiveCD .. but tracked it down to debootstrap) | 13:58 |
| ogra_ | debootstrap.log is sadly pretty empty (a few gpg key messages and the final error line) | 13:58 |
| cjwatson | not off the top of my head, sorry, you could try hacking /usr/sbin/debootstrap | 14:00 |
| * ogra_ starts to wonder if wrapping the whole thing into a qemu-arm-static chroot probably causes this | 14:00 | |
| rbasak | Sorry about the puppet component mismatch. I failed to check. | 15:12 |
| * rbasak will sort it out. | 15:12 | |
| jamespage | infinity, what will be the status of the arm64 port for 14.04? will it have full 5 year support? | 15:48 |
| ogra_ | 5 years is for arm 32bit ... must be 10 years for arm64 indeed | 15:49 |
| ogra_ | :P | 15:49 |
| xnox | jamespage: i have a merge proposal up against launchpad to mark arm64 for a 5 year support. (such that supported: field in packages/arm64 declares that) | 16:23 |
| xnox | jamespage: as far I remember that hasn't been merged yet. | 16:24 |
| ogra_ | hmpf, there seems to be a mirroring issue with cdimage | 16:24 |
| xnox | jamespage: oh, and that also add armhf to 5y support ;-) | 16:24 |
| ogra_ | if i reload http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/daily-preinstalled/ repeatedly, the 20140122.1 dir randomly vanishes and re-appears | 16:25 |
| xnox | https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/launchpad/update-maintenance-check-3/+merge/194778 | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | ogra_: ask IS | 16:26 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, thks, will do (after my daily meeting marathon) | 16:26 |
| Riddell | stgraber, highvoltage: how's alpha 2 testing going to edubuntu? do you have a release page? | 16:27 |
| xnox | Riddell: i'm about to upload ubiquity with a few fixes..... =) | 16:28 |
| Riddell | xnox: oh? will that need respins? gtk and kde? | 16:28 |
| xnox | Riddell: gtk only.... + a few d-i components updates. | 16:29 |
| Riddell | knome: will you want a respin for that ubiquity change? | 16:30 |
| xnox | bug #1260396 & bug #1260473 | 16:30 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1260396 in gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Trusty) "Ubiquity window spans width of screen" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1260396 | 16:30 |
| ubot2` | Launchpad bug 1260473 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "The slide bar that allow to rezise the partition does not appear" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1260473 | 16:30 |
| Riddell | knome: can you confirm the release page on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/Alpha2/ ? | 16:30 |
| Riddell | utlemming: no alpha 2 for cloud? | 16:30 |
| xnox | Riddell: yeah, most of release pages need text copies from alpha2 notes. | 16:31 |
| xnox | Riddell: or updated URLs to flavour websites, if that is used. | 16:31 |
| xnox | Riddell: actually, I can't build ubiquity at the moment =) so no ubiquity update just yet. | 16:33 |
| utlemming | riddel: yes, there will be | 16:57 |
| utlemming | Riddel: the alpha2 is still processing | 16:57 |
| xnox | Riddell: to be honest, i'm less worried about respins these days, as we have autopilot tests running on a dozen typical configurations doing a "click through as a user" installations. | 17:36 |
| Riddell | xnox: alpha 2 is for flavours which don't have that I think? | 17:37 |
| xnox | Riddell: i believe it's running against all gtk flavours. | 17:37 |
| xnox | Riddell: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/search/?q=ubiquity | 17:37 |
| xnox | ubuntu, lubuntu, xubuntu, edubuntu, gnome | 17:37 |
| === jodh` is now known as jodh | ||
| xnox | a (decentish) coverage. No kubuntu, as that's a different frontend / toolkit and needs it's own set of "scripts of button pushing" and asserts. | 17:38 |
| Laney | I'd just let the flavour guys know and they can pick it up if they want it | 17:38 |
| Laney | self service ho | 17:38 |
| xnox | Laney: =) | 17:39 |
| sil2100 | Hi everyone! Could we get an unblock from the freeze for webbrowser-app? | 17:40 |
| sil2100 | It has a very important fix of a regression for Ubuntu Touch, and we're blocked on promoting a new image without it | 17:40 |
| sil2100 | Pretty please :) | 17:41 |
| xnox | Riddell: Laney: updated ubiquity is uploaded, let release team / flavours judge if they want it in. No strong preference when it lands (e.g. today or on friday) | 17:50 |
| xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/2.17.4 | 17:50 |
| * xnox off to volleyball | 17:50 | |
| Laney | sil2100: xnox: Done | 18:07 |
| Laney | darkxst: highvoltage: stgraber: knome: New ubiquity might be interesting for you | 18:07 |
| Laney | if you want to self-service some respins | 18:08 |
| * Laney → climbing, see you | 18:08 | |
| highvoltage | Laney: enjoy, will check a bit later | 18:10 |
| seb128 | Laney, have fun! | 18:12 |
| sil2100 | Laney: thank you! | 18:22 |
| stgraber | note that the new ubiquity is curently stuck in proposed due to build failures | 18:32 |
| stgraber | so respins won't pick it up | 18:32 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, in case you are intrested, i found the issue with live-build ... seems i cant run it inside a qemu-arm-static chroot because the build chroot will lack the qemu-arm-static binary in /usr/bin | 19:52 |
| === jackson is now known as Guest4739 | ||
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| * ogra_ finds LB_BOOTSTRAP_QEMU_STATIC | 20:12 | |
| Laney | stgraber: it already failed in those places ;-) | 21:57 |
| Laney | was assuming/hoping people would check it was in release before pressing ze button | 21:57 |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| xnox | stgraber: i don't see ubiquity stuck due to build-failures. | 23:34 |
| xnox | stgraber: it's just arm64 & ppc64el don't have X capable of changing keyboard layouts yet =) | 23:35 |
| xnox | stgraber: which i guess should be fixed sooner rather than later. | 23:35 |
| stgraber | xnox: hmm, looks like it got copied over, must have been something else slowing down the copy then as last I looked it was still in -proposed hours after upload | 23:39 |
| xnox | stgraber: yeah. not sure why Laney unblocked ubiquity, I thought the consensus across flavours is needed. I guess Laney expressed it as, "each flavour may choose to push the respin button to get new ubiquity" =) | 23:42 |
| stgraber | yeah, that's fine | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!