[08:10] <dholbach> good morning
[09:44] <zequence> Hi. We have a fix commited for ubuntustudio-default-settings. Would like a sponsor to help upload it. lp bug #1259525
[09:46] <zequence> branch is lp:ubuntustudio-default-settings
[11:09] <mitya57> zequence: please subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
[11:12] <zequence> mitya57: Ah, thanks
[11:43] <gg0> hi
[11:43] <gg0> could anyone help me backporting a gnash patch?
[11:44] <gg0> xnox already filed #1253468 a couple of months ago
[15:08] <gg0> a couple of months ago
[18:22] <teward> gg0: xnox assigned himself to the bug... I think you need to poke xnox about that
[19:24] <jtaylor> how do I disable png optimization for a package?
[19:27] <Laney> I think export NO_PNG_PACKAGE_MANGLE=1
[19:29] <jtaylor> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=NO_PNG_PACKAGE_MANGLE
[19:30] <jtaylor> mh no results = not right, or don't bother trying to forward to debian
[19:30] <jtaylor> (or never used)
[19:31] <Ampelbein> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE
[19:31] <jtaylor> thx
[19:32] <Ampelbein> But only 1 result, so maybe wrong as well ;)
[19:32] <jtaylor> just started grebbing pkgbinarymangler
[19:33] <Laney> (trusty-amd64)root@iota:/# grep NO_PNG /usr/bin/pkgstripfiles  if [ -n "$NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE" ]; then
[22:29] <gg0> teward: already poked, xnox assigned it to himself two months ago, no progress since then. i don't think he will complain if anyone else does the job
[22:29] <gg0> xnox: right?
[22:30] <gg0> anyone interested?
[22:30] <teward> gg0: i want to clear it with him first, I poked -devel to see if xnox is around, the patch builds in amd64 for that bug in saucy, so I don't see a issue with it, but as most of what I do is CLI i can't test.
[22:31] <teward> gg0: since it's typically good form NOT to do the work of others who're assigned to a bug if they have it on their to-do list (note the "low" priority on that bug though)
[22:33] <teward> gg0: i know it'll build for Saucy, though, because I did so in a chroot successfully (aka, with sbuild) , but i still have to test the others, I had some nginx updates I had to push to PPAs, so it went on the backburner (it takes about 50 minutes per build in a chroot though, so i won't have build tests done for a while)
[22:35] <gg0> i'm sure it does build on all versions given gnash version is the same. i'm less sure about reproducing the issue but that can be done even in a chroot
[22:35] <teward> gg0: well, not within an sbuild chroot, but I can *maybe* push things to a private repository for testing later... brb dinner
[22:36] <gg0> i don't know ubuntu process. you'll have to reproduce it on all version you want to backport to, right?
[22:37] <gg0> teward: thanks for your time in advance
[22:38] <gg0> you might be interested in applying and backporting these ones as well
[22:38] <gg0> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266088
[22:38] <gg0> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1266089
[22:54] <teward> gg0: yeah, i've got enough on my plate right now, I was just doing xnox a favor by peeking at whether it builds for Saucy and such :)
[22:55] <teward> gg0: but given that the first one you linked was "low" priority, me helping SRU those is at the bottom of my to do list.
[22:57] <teward> gg0: but, those bugs there, the two you just linked, are missing information I'd need as a triager to test/fix/etc.  You need to point at which versions of Ubuntu are affected
[22:57] <teward> therefore stating which versions need fixing ;)
[23:00] <gg0> teward: all gnash versions on all ubuntu versions. about gnash one #1266088 alternatives has been renamed to adobe player one by ubuntu uploaders, i guess on all ubuntu versions. about the latter #1266089, on lightspark alternatives should be renamed to adobe one too for consistency, always been wrong i guess
[23:02] <teward> I'd suggest adding that information to the bugs.  :)
[23:02] <gg0> you would do the right thing: ubuntu broke it, ubuntu fixes it :p
[23:02] <teward> ... and another schroot failure on my sbuild >.>
[23:02]  * teward goes to destroy and rebuild his schroots