[02:05] <hobbyBobby> hi all, struggling to set up virtual box and I have a sos report here if you're willing to help
[02:05] <hobbyBobby> *with juju
[02:06] <hobbyBobby> from what I can tell it can't resolve the mongo address because of some networking issue
[02:18] <hobbyBobby> wow im daft
[02:53] <rick_h_> thumper: the config hook issue from last night was because I ran a make command that didn't background. So it never 'committed' and wouldn't rerun
[02:54] <rick_h_> thumper: just fyi, I was a moron that is all :)
[03:24] <thumper> :)
[10:41] <melmoth> hola... i m trying to remove a ceph-osd unit. it fails when it try to destroy the realtion with ceph-mon;:
[10:41] <melmoth> 2014-01-28 10:40:05 ERROR juju.worker.uniter uniter.go:350 hook failed: fork/exec /var/lib/juju/agents/unit-ceph-osd-2/charm/hooks/mon-relation-departed: cannot allocate memory
[10:42] <melmoth> the cpeh-osd box has 500M of ram
[10:42] <melmoth> what can i do ?
[12:34] <jamespage> melmoth, not much - you could do a juju terminate-machine --force #
[12:35] <jamespage> that will kill it outright for you
[12:35] <melmoth> i destroyed all environment, and redeployed again with 1G of ram on esd node
[12:35] <melmoth> jamespage seems to work better
[12:35] <jamespage> melmoth, yeah - anything complicated needs something bigger than 500M
[12:36] <jamespage> melmoth, we bumped the default instance memory in our openstack qa environment for that reason
[12:36] <jamespage> 900M
[15:16] <bloodearnest> anyone know of any charms that can utilise round-robin DNS?
[15:55] <rick_h_> bloodearnest: how would that work? Wouldn't you just assign the cnames in dns and point at the exposed front end services?
[15:56] <bloodearnest> rick_h_: it's for the frontend that I want it :)
[15:56] <bloodearnest> rick_h_: I was thinking that when a new unit is added, it adds it's ip to the pool of ips in the DNS server
[15:56] <rick_h_> bloodearnest: oic, so you'd need a dns server charm that could accept a realtion to web app charms then
[15:56] <bloodearnest> and when the unit is removed, it pops it's ip from the pool
[15:57] <rick_h_> right
[15:57] <bloodearnest> rick_h_: in theory, the DNS wouldn'y need to be charmed (as DNS tends to be non-juju-env infrastructure), but it'd need an api for a charm to use
[15:57] <bloodearnest> I guess
[15:58] <rick_h_> bloodearnest: https://jujucharms.com/sidebar/~hazmat/precise/aws-route53-2/#bws-readme looks interesting
[15:58] <bloodearnest> not 100% convinced rr-DNS is the best solution for this problem, just seeing if anything has already been done
[15:59] <rick_h_> bloodearnest: I think honestly most people just put haproxy in fron of it
[15:59] <rick_h_> and then use the realtions to that to control adding/removing
[16:00] <bloodearnest> rick_h_: sure, but this is aimed at scaling 1M+ long-lived https connections
[16:00] <bloodearnest> s/https/tls, it's not http
[16:00] <rick_h_> bloodearnest: ah k
[16:01] <bloodearnest> some http clients don't support rr-DNS well anyway, so we may have to DIY it
[16:03] <bloodearnest> rick_h_: tell you all about it in Cape Town next week :)
[16:03] <rick_h_> bloodearnest: sounds good
[16:04]  * bloodearnest has a list of juju gui feature ideas to throw at someone... :)
[16:05]  * rick_h_ ducks
[16:11] <jcastro> negronjl, https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/mongodb/+bug/1267222
[16:11] <_mup_> Bug #1267222: Race condition when deploying a simple replica set <audit> <mongodb (Juju Charms Collection):New for negronjl> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1267222>
[16:11] <jcastro> hey if you're too busy to fix that if you could post where you think the problem is I can have one of our dudes take a look?
[16:13] <jcastro> arosales, mbruzek, lazyPower, marcoceppi: I have a newish proposal for the audit
[16:14] <jcastro> so like, we sorted the list by downloads, but we're now getting into the "not top 10".
[16:14] <jcastro> IMO we should be smarter on targetting now, so for example next on the list is "phpmyadmin", I'd like to skip that and go to ganglia next.
[16:14] <marcoceppi> jcastro: sounds good to me
[16:15] <marcoceppi> feel free to re-order the list as you see fit
[16:15] <jcastro> like, go after the big services, nothing against myphpadmin
[16:15] <lazyPower> Agreed, if you need to change my priority queue i have no problems with it.
[16:15] <jcastro> marcoceppi, I thought about that but I do want to leave it sorted by downloads, because people are using it, and I get that
[16:16] <lazyPower> jcastro, actually if you want you can assign a batch of 3 or 4 charms so i have "up next" targets
[16:16] <jcastro> but like, logstash-agent is #93 and that's probably way more important than phpmyadmin
[16:17] <jcastro> lazyPower, I am putting "should be higher priority" in the notes column
[16:17] <jcastro> then I'll just start on their readmes, so "follow the green" I guess?
[16:18] <jcastro> lazyPower, hadoop worked fine for me btw
[16:18] <lazyPower> thats so strange
[16:18] <jcastro> is it not working for you at all?
[16:18] <lazyPower> Which version of juju are you running jorge?
[16:19] <lazyPower> no, its got an inline hack to parse the machine id, and since my LXC containers do not generate FQDN's its failing at that point in the install hook.
[16:19] <lazyPower> This may be specific to my setup thats causing the failure, and I feel like this is a growing problem, that probably needs addressed this week.
[16:22] <jcastro> lazyPower, 1.17
[16:23] <jcastro> lazyPower, my local provider is broken so I was on AWS
[16:23] <lazyPower> aaahhh see, i said it works in cloud providers :)
[16:23]  * jcastro is on trusty
[16:23] <jcastro> oh, I missed that!
[16:24] <lazyPower> glad its +1'd though
[16:24] <lazyPower> the tests for that are going to be hairy
[16:26] <arosales> jcastro, agreed and some charms may not have had the life span to attract the higher number, but if you know ones we should hit first perhaps highlight those in orange
[16:27] <jcastro> yeah, like I said, nothing wrong against phpmyadmin, but like, we should be wailing on things like cassandra and so on
[16:28] <arosales> jcastro, I got your feedback addressed in https://code.launchpad.net/~a.rosales/charms/precise/jenkins/update-metadata-readme/+merge/203181
[16:36] <arosales> lazyPower, mbruzek good time to do some +1's on the queue this morning
[16:36] <lazyPower> arosales, already ahead of you :) Working through OpenMRS as we speak
[16:37] <arosales> lazyPower, mbruzek hpcc and openvpn-* are also good candidates
[16:38] <mbruzek> arosales, take from the top of the review queue or the red  tracking box in leankit?
[16:38] <lazyPower> good question ^
[16:38] <lazyPower> arosales, jcastro can i get another +1 on this? the charm is solid from my testing standpoint. https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1125869
[16:38] <_mup_> Bug #1125869: New charm: postfix <Juju Charms Collection:New for jose> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1125869>
[16:39] <arosales> mbruzek, lazyPower generally from the top as those have been in the queue the longest
[16:39] <jcastro> looking
[16:41] <hazmat> bloodearnest, rick_h_ that aws-route53 charm isn't rr dns fwiw.. but route53 can do it, and low latency routing across multiple backends.
[16:43] <bloodearnest> hazmat: yeah, I'd love to use route53, but it's ec2 only, and my target is openstack. idk of an equivalent/similar service for openstack
[16:44] <hazmat> bloodearnest, route53 is not ec2 only.
[16:44] <hazmat> its dns
[16:44] <rick_h_> hazmat: right, I was thinking more an example of doing DNS tweaks based on relations via a charm
[16:44] <hazmat> there are some ec2 specific provisions granted, but nothing prevents general use
[16:44] <hazmat> rick_h_, thats exactly what the aws-route53 charm does
[16:45] <lazyPower> oh brilliant
[16:45] <rick_h_> hazmat: right
[16:45] <hazmat> most of my aws charms back into https://github.com/kapilt/awsjuju .. a couple of other goodies in there
[16:46] <hazmat> but i'd label it pre-alpha
[16:46] <hazmat> except the automated backup stuff
[16:47] <hazmat> which is just alpha :-)
[16:55] <bloodearnest> hazmat: huh, TIL. Maybe an option then.
[16:55] <bloodearnest> thanks
[17:35] <jose> jcastro: did you get to take a look at the postfix charm?
[17:35] <jcastro> not yet no
[17:35] <jcastro> I see it on the list though
[17:35] <jose> well, I'll wait then :)
[17:48] <jamespage> adam_g, I switched all the icehouse branchs to openstack-charmers btw - https://code.launchpad.net/~openstack-charmers