TheDrums | cub: Guess you don't know what problems ttoine was having building it? | 08:31 |
---|---|---|
cub | nope I didn't see anything more aobut it | 08:32 |
cub | not sure why he was building it since there seem to be a .deb as well | 08:33 |
TheDrums | 0.92 is latest on the website. | 08:39 |
cub | yes, seems to be the latest available | 08:45 |
cub | Are linux developers shy of saying 1.0? Seems most applications always are 0.xx | 08:46 |
TheDrums | Most don't have a leading 0. :P I have a built package of 0.92 based on the Debian Exp one, was pretty simple. | 08:57 |
zequence | One might as well use dating for versioning, if you ask me | 09:41 |
cub | and talking about versions, are we keeping Ardour 2 in 14.04? | 09:47 |
zequence | cub: You want to remove it? | 09:57 |
zequence | I don't see why we need to keep it | 09:58 |
cub | No, there was a questions in #ubuntustudio yesterday | 10:00 |
cub | I haven't had time to run ardour3 yet :( | 10:00 |
cub | But isn't it backwards compatible? | 10:01 |
cub | You can open A2 projects in version 3, but not version 3 projects in Ardour2, right? | 10:01 |
zequence | yep | 10:04 |
zequence | I think some people might still run mixbus - based on ardour2, but I can't see why someone would prefer ardour2 over ardour3 | 10:05 |
cub | good evening | 18:33 |
cub | zequence, is there anything we can do about the i386 iso failing? | 18:33 |
cub | I browsed through the log file some days ago but it didn't really do me any good | 18:34 |
cub | hmm but the latest iso seem to be from the 27th. So perhaps it did build one day there. Never mind me then. | 18:35 |
=== cub_ is now known as cub |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!