[09:09] <sil2100> Morning!
[09:10] <sil2100> ricmm: hi! Is there anyone else we could hook up into fixing/looking at this qtubuntu qmlscene-crash?
[09:12] <ricmm> sil2100: gerry is looking at it too
[09:16] <sil2100> ricmm: great! Thanks
[09:24] <sil2100> ogra_, psivaa, plars: you guys free for a meeting in 5 minutes?
[09:25] <Mirv> sil2100: do we have the day meeting today in hangout?
[09:25] <sil2100> Mirv: yes, at least we'll try to have one ;D
[09:26] <sil2100> Mirv: didrocks is busy in other meetings so we'll try to have it without him, I'll try to gather the guys here so we can all hear eachother
[09:26] <Mirv> sil2100: ok
[09:26] <Mirv> I'm taking Jono's advice and working in a cafe so that I don't feel so alone when you all are together ;)
[09:27] <sil2100> Mirv: oh, outside of your house? Nice, although next week you'll be here with us anyway ;)
[09:28] <Mirv> sil2100: yeah that's nice too :)
[09:29] <sil2100> Wait for us in the hangout for some moments if anything, since I still need to gather people around - we'll have a quick meeting though from what I see
[09:33] <Mirv> waiting
[09:58] <sil2100> Mirv: how's the weather at your place?
[10:04] <Mirv> sil2100: it seems sunny and "warm" :) (-8'C, but it was -20'C for some time)
[10:04] <sil2100> Mirv: hoho, sounds nice! As long as it's sunny and not windy, I guess it's good
[10:04] <sil2100> Mirv: guess what - it's raining here
[10:05] <sil2100> Mirv: although yesterday it was quite sunny
[10:51] <sergiusens> didrocks, so line 19 is good enough? no rush
[10:54] <didrocks> sergiusens: I guess flo isn't Kaleo? :p
[10:55] <didrocks> sergiusens: perfect, assigning silo ;)
[10:55] <sergiusens> :-P
[11:00] <sil2100> davmor2, popey: hello guys!
[11:00] <popey> sil2100: hi
[11:00] <sil2100> davmor2, popey: could you please dogfood the latest image? #151
[11:00] <sil2100> We decided that we can actually think of it as a promotion candidate (due to various reasons)
[11:04] <davmor2> sil2100: Hello
[11:04] <davmor2> sil2100: yeap just need to get set back up first and then I'll dogfood maguro
[11:04] <sil2100> Thanks guys, would be great to get a new promoted image
[11:04] <sil2100> JUST DON'T FIND ANY BUGS
[11:04] <sil2100> Dogfood with your eyes closed!
[11:12]  * ogra_ puts a carpet over all the bugs running around 
[11:19] <cjwatson> pepo (archive master) and alphecca (buildd-manager) are being upgraded to precise; there'll be no builds or publications for an hour or so
[12:00] <sil2100> Can anyone try reviewing and approving in their free time https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/dee-qt/add_cpp_symbols/+merge/202679 ?
[12:07] <sil2100> popey, davmor2: any luck on dogfooding? *keeps his fingers crossed*
[12:08] <davmor2> sil2100: looking at it now.  took a while to get everything back together after yesterday.  About 30 minutes more for me
[12:09] <popey> sil2100: working on it
[12:10] <popey> sil2100: green enough for me ☻
[12:11] <popey> davmor2: will find something though
[12:11] <davmor2> popey: :D
[12:11] <sil2100> NO
[12:12]  * sil2100 hits his desk with his fist
[12:12] <popey> hah
[12:12] <sil2100> popey: btw. I stole your USB cable! Oh no!
[12:12] <popey> OUTRAGE!
[12:12] <sil2100> popey: maybe if you pop up at the office next week I might be able to give it back to you
[12:13] <popey> I'm in .fl next week. if you give it to someone going to florida I can get it back, thanks ☻
[12:13] <sil2100> ACK ;)
[12:13] <popey> msm knows who is going
[12:13] <sil2100> ogra_: could you ACK this? http://162.213.34.102/job/landing-002-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-scopes-api_0.2.6+14.04.20140128-0ubuntu1.diff (just one .install file modification)
[12:29] <davmor2> sil2100: mostly looking good nothing new only known issues that I can see I'll play with it for the rest of the day though I'm sure there is something :D
[14:08] <sil2100> kgunn: hi! You around already? :)
[14:09] <sil2100> kgunn: I would like to work on mir landing a bit, tell you about all the glorious problems we have
[14:09] <kgunn> sil2100: yep...on a hangout...but please keep typing
[14:10] <Mirv> sil2100: ok qtserial module is now in the PPA and pyqt5 starts building but has a build error on armhf that sounds like upstream problem regarding the qreal ABI change (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/164027747/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-armhf.pyqt5_1%3A5.2%2Bdfsg-0~10%2B201401291329~ubuntu14.04.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz)
[14:12] <sil2100> kgunn: so... we have a problem it seems, and don't worry if I free the Mir silo for a moment
[14:12] <sil2100> kgunn: (want to unblock some other stuff since we're a bit blocked)
[14:12] <Mirv> sil2100: x86 builders seem busy, so it's yet to be seen if it compiles for them
[14:13] <sil2100> kgunn: the problem is we can't really build xorg-server right now due to a toolchain issue
[14:13] <sil2100> kgunn: so, until it's resolved in xorg-server, it cannot be rebuilt
[14:14] <sil2100> Mirv: thanks! Well, I had a discussio with the bug guys and it seems they invalidly said they're using qt 5.2
[14:15] <sil2100> Mirv: it seems the bug was in the old Qt ._. So it's for the legacy appmenu-qt5...
[14:16] <Mirv> sil2100: right, they meant 5(.0).2 .. that's what I thought. still, one more build failure that needs to be resolved anyhow. I filed bug #1274128
[14:18] <sil2100> Mirv: hoho, so we actually catched a Qt5.2 build bug because of that, so good
[14:20] <timp> what is the reason that ubuntu-ui-toolkit MRs submitted by people not in the SDK team do not trigger jenkins to run CI tests?
[14:20] <timp> like this one https://code.launchpad.net/~andrew-hayzen/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fix-swipe-delete-002/+merge/202171
[14:20] <timp> I like to see those results for every MR before top-approving
[14:20] <cjohnston> timp: they aren't Canonical
[14:20] <sil2100> kgunn: let's catch up once you're free
[14:20] <cjohnston> non-Canonical has to be ack'ed before its tested
[14:21] <timp> cjohnston: is there a way for me to manually trigger those tests to run?
[14:21] <timp> cjohnston: what do you mean with ack'ed exactly?
[14:21] <cjohnston> it has to be approved
[14:22] <Mirv> sil2100: yes, excellent
[14:22] <fginther> timp, if the tests pass, would you then approve it?
[14:23] <kgunn> sil2100: ok...its my long meeting morning, i'll hit you up when i'm free
[14:23] <kgunn> sil2100: cause i really really want mir landed :)
[14:24] <sil2100> kgunn: we want that as well! It seems things AS ALWAYS just get in our way
[14:24] <sil2100> kgunn: so just poke me once you're free
[14:26] <timp> fginther: yes
[14:26] <timp> fginther: although I also use the CI results to download the zip with deb files that I can install on device so I can do some manual testing
[14:26] <timp> cjohnston: do you mean I should top-approve it first? Then it runs the autolanding tests, not CI tests right?
[14:27] <cjohnston> timp: for non-canonical, yes, it has to be top approved.. then it will go through the testing/landing..you would need to build it yourself for local testing
[14:38] <timp> cjohnston: okay, thanks. I'll do some local testing and then top-approve
[14:39] <cjohnston> sounds good
[14:39] <didrocks> ricmm: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopilot/+bug/1274139 FYI, as we discussed
[14:40] <fginther> Mirv, jenkins isn't reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/kubuntu-packaging/qtdeclarative-opensource_src_fix_LP_1273684/+merge/203666 because ps-jenkins is not a member of the ~kubuntu-packagers
[14:44] <ricmm> didrocks: ty
[14:44] <didrocks> thank you for the detailed explanation :)
[15:01] <kgunn> sil2100: ok free
[15:03] <sil2100> kgunn: one moment, let me just finish my meeting now
[15:04] <sil2100> kgunn: so, anyway, the problem we have - xorg-server FTBFS on i386
[15:04] <sil2100> kgunn: we need one of the maintainers to fix that along with the release
[15:05] <kgunn> sil2100: ack...is someone on fixing the ftbfs for xserver ?
[15:05] <kgunn> sil2100: i can go irritate people if needed :)
[15:06] <sil2100> kgunn: not yet, but maybe you could help me pinging RAOF or mlankhorst or anyone else that's a maintainer ;)
[15:06] <sil2100> kgunn: the bug is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1266492
[15:06] <sil2100> kgunn: it's caused by the toolchain actually
[16:14] <davmor2> popey: did you actually file a bug for your headset issue or did you want to basically use cyphermox 's hsp bug?
[16:32] <sil2100> kgunn: ok, so we're practically unblocked with xorg-server, but now Didier and Loic are still fighting the platform-api issue
[16:33] <kgunn> sil2100: thanks for the update...and yeah, weird codec.h
[16:33] <kgunn> sil2100: i suppose no big deal...i'm gonna miss the release meeting, i have an external call i have to do
[16:34] <sil2100> kgunn: no problem, we're fighting - it's no longer missing codec.h which is the problem though
[16:35] <sil2100> kgunn: I fixed that in the morning by attaching some other required merges from tvoss, but now it seems that in overall platform-api fails running its unit tests for armhf for magical reasons
[16:35] <sil2100> We're haunted today
[16:35] <davmor2> wooooooooooooooooo
[16:36] <davmor2> sil2100: are you still haunted by the notion that I will find a bug?
[16:37] <sil2100> :
[16:37] <sil2100> :|
[16:38] <davmor2> sil2100: live by my moto, If at first it doesn't break, use a bigger hammer ;)
[19:32] <tedg> balloons, Hey, so do those tests look like they're in the right format?  https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/mr-policy/+merge/203788
[19:33] <balloons> tedg, first glance yes they look correct. We have  a script to check compliance
[19:33] <tedg> balloons, Which package is it in?
[19:33] <balloons> if you want strict compliance :p
[19:33] <balloons> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ContributingTestcases/ManualStyleGuide/test_case_format_script
[19:33] <balloons> it's not packaged
[19:34] <tedg> Oh, can we package it?  Then I can make a test for it.
[19:34] <balloons> ohh I see they even have you move it to /usr/bin :-) I just run it
[19:34] <balloons> yea, packaging it is probably a good idea :-)
[19:47] <tedg> balloons, Do you have a tool to convert that into wiki syntax?
[19:47] <tedg> Not a big deal, but it'd be handy.
[19:48] <balloons> tedg, what do you mean convert into wiki? convert what exactly?
[19:49] <tedg> balloons, The test into something that looks pretty on the wiki.  That's the requirement right now :-/
[19:49] <balloons> ahh.. no I don't have something like that :-0
[19:49] <tedg> balloons, Well, that it's on the wiki is the requirement.  I'm happy not making it pretty.
[19:50] <balloons> we have the tracker in mind, so it looks pretty on there :-)
[19:50] <tedg> balloons, Yeah, are you guys going to import all these manual test cases into the tracker?
[19:53] <balloons> ATM we hold the tracker cases here; https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests
[19:54] <tedg> balloons, Yes, but as part of the "CI Train" we're supposed to have a set of manual tests that are run.  It seems like those would be good to run generally as well.
[19:55] <balloons> right.. which brings to head the issue of having a single repo for tests
[19:55] <tedg> RIght now they're in the wiki, but everyone who replied thinks they should go in the project.
[19:55] <balloons> Yes, I would agree they should go in the project
[19:55] <tedg> So that way when you merge a feature the test and the feature land at the same time.
[19:56] <tedg> I put my in "tests/manual" -- hoping to start a trend :-)
[19:56] <tedg> balloons, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/upstart-app-launch
[19:56] <tedg> (the bzr line won't work until the first version gets merged in)
[20:01] <balloons> tedg, a minor quip.. " Everything behaves as expected"  should probably be expounded and clarified :-)
[20:01] <tedg> balloons, ?  I mean, there are specific things in each point of that test case.
[20:01] <tedg> balloons, Not sure what else to say "it passes"
[20:01] <balloons> Test-case upstart-app-launch/secondary-activation, first expected result..
[20:02] <balloons> oO.. run testcase.. sorry
[20:02] <balloons> see what happens when I don't read thoroughly
[20:02] <tedg> Heh
[20:03] <tedg> cihelp Can someone with permissions click on the "Build" button here: http://162.213.34.102/job/landing-010-1-build/build?delay=0sec
[20:03] <balloons> I was seeing "Do this"; with expected result as "it works" :-)
[20:03]  * tedg isn't adult enough to be trusted with building software
[20:06] <tedg> didrocks, Are you still around? ^
[20:06] <didrocks> tedg: talk to asac
[20:07] <tedg> didrocks, Well, not that, the clicking the button.
[20:07] <didrocks> tedg: oh, the ftbfs is fixed?
[20:07] <tedg> didrocks, There wasn't one, it was a chroot issue.
[20:07] <didrocks> ah ok
[20:07]  * didrocks clicks
[20:07] <didrocks> (done)
[20:07] <tedg> Thanks didrocks
[20:08] <didrocks> yw
[20:40] <cjwatson> tedg: chroot issues> those are global right now
[20:40] <cjwatson> tedg: we're working as fast as possible to get at least builds back, but in the meantime the builders are on manual
[20:41] <tedg> cjwatson, Ah, okay.  Thanks for the update
[20:41]  * tedg broke it
[20:41] <tedg> :-)
[20:41] <cjwatson> (apt-ftparchive hash corruption following upgrade of archive master to precise)
[20:41] <cjwatson> (-> fucked archive)
[20:41] <tedg> Uhm, yeah.  A bit :-)
[20:41] <cjwatson> (-> sad launchpad team panda)
[20:50] <cjwatson> should be back now, we're retrying all the chrootwait builds in bulk
[21:44] <Saviq> mterry, yeah, here, but I doubt we'll get anywhere without fginther
[21:44] <mterry> Saviq, hrm
[21:45] <mterry> Saviq, do we want to disable the test then in the interim?
[21:45] <Saviq> mterry, he's got a debugging machine set aside http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-trusty-debug-fjg/
[21:45] <mterry> Saviq, I suspect CI misconfiguration at this point, but will need fginther for more details
[21:45] <Saviq> mterry, but I've no idea how to access it...
[21:45] <mterry> Nor me
[21:46] <Saviq> mterry, no, let's just fix it tomorrow, if you could cook up an email for when you're not around, that'd be great
[21:46] <mterry> Saviq, I don't follow
[21:46] <mterry> Saviq, to explain the problem?  oK
[21:46] <Saviq> mterry, yeah, and what to look at, that you know of
[21:54] <elopio> ping cihelp. Somebody around to help me with the ubuntu-ui-toolkit jobs?
[21:54] <elopio> they are pulling a unity ppa that has a broken autopilot.
[21:57] <cjohnston> elopio: links?
[21:58] <elopio> cjohnston: links to what?
[21:58] <elopio> here's a failure caused by libautopilot-qt 1.4+14.04.20140129-0ubuntu1
[21:58] <elopio> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-trusty/2384/consoleText
[21:58] <elopio> this is the ppa that's pulling it:
[21:58] <elopio> http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-unity/daily-build/ubuntu/
[21:59] <elopio> I've tried downgrading libautopilot-qt to the version we have in trusty, and it works.
[21:59] <cjohnston> elopio: have you tried contacting the maintainer of the ppa?
[21:59] <elopio> and Saviq says we shouldn't be using the ppa anymore, as trunk is now the stable branch.
[21:59] <elopio> cjohnston: yes ^. And veebers is figuring out why this recent libautopilot-qt is broken.
[21:59] <Saviq> cjohnston, that ppa is "maintained" by the daily release machinery
[22:00] <elopio> but if we don't use that PPA, then we have no failures for the moment. I think.
[22:00] <Saviq> cjohnston, which, as of this week, is deprecated
[22:00] <cjohnston> elopio: if you all want it switched to branch file a bug
[22:00] <Saviq> cjohnston, they just need the hook to be removed from the job
[22:01] <Saviq> cjohnston, D09add_ppa~ubuntu-unity~daily-build
[22:01] <cjohnston> that's fine. file a bug and it will be looked at. I don't know enough about what's going on to where I'm comfortable doing it
[22:01] <Saviq> cjohnston, oh ok
[22:01] <Saviq> elopio, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ci-services-itself/+filebug
[22:01] <cjohnston> any time you have a request like that, please file a bug
[22:02] <cjohnston> having tracking for when/where/why something is changed is very helpful
[22:02] <elopio> Saviq, cjohnston: I'm filing the bug.
[22:06] <elopio> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ci-services-itself/+bug/1274309
[22:09] <bfiller> fginther: trying to land this MR, not sure what's going on with autopilot tests but dialer crashing it seems
[22:09] <bfiller> fginther: https://code.launchpad.net/~boiko/dialer-app/fix_header_update/+merge/203826
[22:09] <bfiller> fginther: is this the same problem you guys have been seeing?
[22:15] <elopio> bfiller: that's the same issue as ^