=== WebbyIT is now known as rpadovani === rpadovani is now known as WebbyIT [09:09] Morning! [09:10] ricmm: hi! Is there anyone else we could hook up into fixing/looking at this qtubuntu qmlscene-crash? [09:12] sil2100: gerry is looking at it too [09:16] ricmm: great! Thanks [09:24] ogra_, psivaa, plars: you guys free for a meeting in 5 minutes? [09:25] sil2100: do we have the day meeting today in hangout? [09:25] Mirv: yes, at least we'll try to have one ;D [09:26] Mirv: didrocks is busy in other meetings so we'll try to have it without him, I'll try to gather the guys here so we can all hear eachother [09:26] sil2100: ok [09:26] I'm taking Jono's advice and working in a cafe so that I don't feel so alone when you all are together ;) [09:27] Mirv: oh, outside of your house? Nice, although next week you'll be here with us anyway ;) [09:28] sil2100: yeah that's nice too :) [09:29] Wait for us in the hangout for some moments if anything, since I still need to gather people around - we'll have a quick meeting though from what I see [09:33] waiting [09:58] Mirv: how's the weather at your place? [10:04] sil2100: it seems sunny and "warm" :) (-8'C, but it was -20'C for some time) [10:04] Mirv: hoho, sounds nice! As long as it's sunny and not windy, I guess it's good [10:04] Mirv: guess what - it's raining here [10:05] Mirv: although yesterday it was quite sunny [10:51] didrocks, so line 19 is good enough? no rush [10:54] sergiusens: I guess flo isn't Kaleo? :p [10:55] sergiusens: perfect, assigning silo ;) [10:55] :-P [11:00] davmor2, popey: hello guys! [11:00] sil2100: hi [11:00] davmor2, popey: could you please dogfood the latest image? #151 [11:00] We decided that we can actually think of it as a promotion candidate (due to various reasons) [11:04] sil2100: Hello [11:04] sil2100: yeap just need to get set back up first and then I'll dogfood maguro [11:04] Thanks guys, would be great to get a new promoted image [11:04] JUST DON'T FIND ANY BUGS [11:04] Dogfood with your eyes closed! [11:12] * ogra_ puts a carpet over all the bugs running around === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr [11:19] pepo (archive master) and alphecca (buildd-manager) are being upgraded to precise; there'll be no builds or publications for an hour or so === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk === alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g [12:00] Can anyone try reviewing and approving in their free time https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/dee-qt/add_cpp_symbols/+merge/202679 ? [12:07] popey, davmor2: any luck on dogfooding? *keeps his fingers crossed* [12:08] sil2100: looking at it now. took a while to get everything back together after yesterday. About 30 minutes more for me [12:09] sil2100: working on it [12:10] sil2100: green enough for me ☻ [12:11] davmor2: will find something though [12:11] popey: :D [12:11] NO [12:12] * sil2100 hits his desk with his fist [12:12] hah [12:12] popey: btw. I stole your USB cable! Oh no! [12:12] OUTRAGE! [12:12] popey: maybe if you pop up at the office next week I might be able to give it back to you [12:13] I'm in .fl next week. if you give it to someone going to florida I can get it back, thanks ☻ [12:13] ACK ;) [12:13] msm knows who is going [12:13] ogra_: could you ACK this? http://162.213.34.102/job/landing-002-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-scopes-api_0.2.6+14.04.20140128-0ubuntu1.diff (just one .install file modification) === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch [12:29] sil2100: mostly looking good nothing new only known issues that I can see I'll play with it for the rest of the day though I'm sure there is something :D === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [14:08] kgunn: hi! You around already? :) [14:09] kgunn: I would like to work on mir landing a bit, tell you about all the glorious problems we have [14:09] sil2100: yep...on a hangout...but please keep typing [14:10] sil2100: ok qtserial module is now in the PPA and pyqt5 starts building but has a build error on armhf that sounds like upstream problem regarding the qreal ABI change (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/164027747/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-armhf.pyqt5_1%3A5.2%2Bdfsg-0~10%2B201401291329~ubuntu14.04.1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz) [14:12] kgunn: so... we have a problem it seems, and don't worry if I free the Mir silo for a moment [14:12] kgunn: (want to unblock some other stuff since we're a bit blocked) [14:12] sil2100: x86 builders seem busy, so it's yet to be seen if it compiles for them [14:13] kgunn: the problem is we can't really build xorg-server right now due to a toolchain issue [14:13] kgunn: so, until it's resolved in xorg-server, it cannot be rebuilt [14:14] Mirv: thanks! Well, I had a discussio with the bug guys and it seems they invalidly said they're using qt 5.2 [14:15] Mirv: it seems the bug was in the old Qt ._. So it's for the legacy appmenu-qt5... [14:16] sil2100: right, they meant 5(.0).2 .. that's what I thought. still, one more build failure that needs to be resolved anyhow. I filed bug #1274128 [14:16] bug 1274128 in pyqt5 (Ubuntu) "pyqt5 does not build against Qt 5.2" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1274128 [14:18] Mirv: hoho, so we actually catched a Qt5.2 build bug because of that, so good [14:20] what is the reason that ubuntu-ui-toolkit MRs submitted by people not in the SDK team do not trigger jenkins to run CI tests? [14:20] like this one https://code.launchpad.net/~andrew-hayzen/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fix-swipe-delete-002/+merge/202171 [14:20] I like to see those results for every MR before top-approving [14:20] timp: they aren't Canonical [14:20] kgunn: let's catch up once you're free [14:20] non-Canonical has to be ack'ed before its tested [14:21] cjohnston: is there a way for me to manually trigger those tests to run? [14:21] cjohnston: what do you mean with ack'ed exactly? [14:21] it has to be approved [14:22] sil2100: yes, excellent [14:22] timp, if the tests pass, would you then approve it? [14:23] sil2100: ok...its my long meeting morning, i'll hit you up when i'm free [14:23] sil2100: cause i really really want mir landed :) [14:24] kgunn: we want that as well! It seems things AS ALWAYS just get in our way [14:24] kgunn: so just poke me once you're free [14:26] fginther: yes [14:26] fginther: although I also use the CI results to download the zip with deb files that I can install on device so I can do some manual testing [14:26] cjohnston: do you mean I should top-approve it first? Then it runs the autolanding tests, not CI tests right? [14:27] timp: for non-canonical, yes, it has to be top approved.. then it will go through the testing/landing..you would need to build it yourself for local testing [14:38] cjohnston: okay, thanks. I'll do some local testing and then top-approve [14:39] sounds good [14:39] ricmm: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopilot/+bug/1274139 FYI, as we discussed [14:39] Ubuntu bug 1274139 in autopilot (Ubuntu) "autopilot should rather use upstart to stop an application rather than sending sigkill" [Undecided,New] [14:40] Mirv, jenkins isn't reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~timo-jyrinki/kubuntu-packaging/qtdeclarative-opensource_src_fix_LP_1273684/+merge/203666 because ps-jenkins is not a member of the ~kubuntu-packagers [14:44] didrocks: ty [14:44] thank you for the detailed explanation :) [15:01] sil2100: ok free [15:03] kgunn: one moment, let me just finish my meeting now [15:04] kgunn: so, anyway, the problem we have - xorg-server FTBFS on i386 [15:04] kgunn: we need one of the maintainers to fix that along with the release [15:05] sil2100: ack...is someone on fixing the ftbfs for xserver ? [15:05] sil2100: i can go irritate people if needed :) [15:06] kgunn: not yet, but maybe you could help me pinging RAOF or mlankhorst or anyone else that's a maintainer ;) [15:06] kgunn: the bug is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1266492 [15:06] Ubuntu bug 1266492 in xorg-server (Ubuntu Trusty) "ld:i386 crashes with -static -fPIE -pie" [Critical,Triaged] [15:06] kgunn: it's caused by the toolchain actually === alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea === alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g === mhall119_ is now known as mhall119 [16:14] popey: did you actually file a bug for your headset issue or did you want to basically use cyphermox 's hsp bug? === gatox is now known as gatox_lunch [16:32] kgunn: ok, so we're practically unblocked with xorg-server, but now Didier and Loic are still fighting the platform-api issue [16:33] sil2100: thanks for the update...and yeah, weird codec.h [16:33] sil2100: i suppose no big deal...i'm gonna miss the release meeting, i have an external call i have to do [16:34] kgunn: no problem, we're fighting - it's no longer missing codec.h which is the problem though [16:35] kgunn: I fixed that in the morning by attaching some other required merges from tvoss, but now it seems that in overall platform-api fails running its unit tests for armhf for magical reasons [16:35] We're haunted today [16:35] wooooooooooooooooo [16:36] sil2100: are you still haunted by the notion that I will find a bug? [16:37] : [16:37] :| [16:38] sil2100: live by my moto, If at first it doesn't break, use a bigger hammer ;) === gatox_lunch is now known as gatox === bfiller is now known as bfiller_afk === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti === bfiller_afk is now known as bfiller [19:32] balloons, Hey, so do those tests look like they're in the right format? https://code.launchpad.net/~ted/upstart-app-launch/mr-policy/+merge/203788 [19:33] tedg, first glance yes they look correct. We have a script to check compliance [19:33] balloons, Which package is it in? [19:33] if you want strict compliance :p [19:33] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/ContributingTestcases/ManualStyleGuide/test_case_format_script [19:33] it's not packaged [19:34] Oh, can we package it? Then I can make a test for it. [19:34] ohh I see they even have you move it to /usr/bin :-) I just run it [19:34] yea, packaging it is probably a good idea :-) [19:47] balloons, Do you have a tool to convert that into wiki syntax? [19:47] Not a big deal, but it'd be handy. [19:48] tedg, what do you mean convert into wiki? convert what exactly? [19:49] balloons, The test into something that looks pretty on the wiki. That's the requirement right now :-/ [19:49] ahh.. no I don't have something like that :-0 [19:49] balloons, Well, that it's on the wiki is the requirement. I'm happy not making it pretty. [19:50] we have the tracker in mind, so it looks pretty on there :-) [19:50] balloons, Yeah, are you guys going to import all these manual test cases into the tracker? [19:53] ATM we hold the tracker cases here; https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests [19:54] balloons, Yes, but as part of the "CI Train" we're supposed to have a set of manual tests that are run. It seems like those would be good to run generally as well. [19:55] right.. which brings to head the issue of having a single repo for tests [19:55] RIght now they're in the wiki, but everyone who replied thinks they should go in the project. [19:55] Yes, I would agree they should go in the project [19:55] So that way when you merge a feature the test and the feature land at the same time. [19:56] I put my in "tests/manual" -- hoping to start a trend :-) [19:56] balloons, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/upstart-app-launch [19:56] (the bzr line won't work until the first version gets merged in) [20:01] tedg, a minor quip.. " Everything behaves as expected" should probably be expounded and clarified :-) [20:01] balloons, ? I mean, there are specific things in each point of that test case. [20:01] balloons, Not sure what else to say "it passes" [20:01] Test-case upstart-app-launch/secondary-activation, first expected result.. [20:02] oO.. run testcase.. sorry [20:02] see what happens when I don't read thoroughly [20:02] Heh [20:03] cihelp Can someone with permissions click on the "Build" button here: http://162.213.34.102/job/landing-010-1-build/build?delay=0sec [20:03] I was seeing "Do this"; with expected result as "it works" :-) [20:03] * tedg isn't adult enough to be trusted with building software [20:06] didrocks, Are you still around? ^ [20:06] tedg: talk to asac [20:07] didrocks, Well, not that, the clicking the button. [20:07] tedg: oh, the ftbfs is fixed? [20:07] didrocks, There wasn't one, it was a chroot issue. [20:07] ah ok [20:07] * didrocks clicks [20:07] (done) [20:07] Thanks didrocks [20:08] yw [20:40] tedg: chroot issues> those are global right now [20:40] tedg: we're working as fast as possible to get at least builds back, but in the meantime the builders are on manual [20:41] cjwatson, Ah, okay. Thanks for the update [20:41] * tedg broke it [20:41] :-) [20:41] (apt-ftparchive hash corruption following upgrade of archive master to precise) [20:41] (-> fucked archive) [20:41] Uhm, yeah. A bit :-) [20:41] (-> sad launchpad team panda) [20:50] should be back now, we're retrying all the chrootwait builds in bulk === seb128_ is now known as seb128 [21:44] mterry, yeah, here, but I doubt we'll get anywhere without fginther [21:44] Saviq, hrm [21:45] Saviq, do we want to disable the test then in the interim? [21:45] mterry, he's got a debugging machine set aside http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-trusty-debug-fjg/ [21:45] Saviq, I suspect CI misconfiguration at this point, but will need fginther for more details [21:45] mterry, but I've no idea how to access it... [21:45] Nor me [21:46] mterry, no, let's just fix it tomorrow, if you could cook up an email for when you're not around, that'd be great [21:46] Saviq, I don't follow [21:46] Saviq, to explain the problem? oK [21:46] mterry, yeah, and what to look at, that you know of [21:54] ping cihelp. Somebody around to help me with the ubuntu-ui-toolkit jobs? [21:54] they are pulling a unity ppa that has a broken autopilot. [21:57] elopio: links? [21:58] cjohnston: links to what? [21:58] here's a failure caused by libautopilot-qt 1.4+14.04.20140129-0ubuntu1 [21:58] https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/autopilot-testrunner-otto-trusty/2384/consoleText [21:58] this is the ppa that's pulling it: [21:58] http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-unity/daily-build/ubuntu/ [21:59] I've tried downgrading libautopilot-qt to the version we have in trusty, and it works. [21:59] elopio: have you tried contacting the maintainer of the ppa? [21:59] and Saviq says we shouldn't be using the ppa anymore, as trunk is now the stable branch. [21:59] cjohnston: yes ^. And veebers is figuring out why this recent libautopilot-qt is broken. [21:59] cjohnston, that ppa is "maintained" by the daily release machinery [22:00] but if we don't use that PPA, then we have no failures for the moment. I think. [22:00] cjohnston, which, as of this week, is deprecated [22:00] elopio: if you all want it switched to branch file a bug [22:00] cjohnston, they just need the hook to be removed from the job [22:01] cjohnston, D09add_ppa~ubuntu-unity~daily-build [22:01] that's fine. file a bug and it will be looked at. I don't know enough about what's going on to where I'm comfortable doing it [22:01] cjohnston, oh ok [22:01] elopio, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ci-services-itself/+filebug [22:01] any time you have a request like that, please file a bug [22:02] having tracking for when/where/why something is changed is very helpful [22:02] Saviq, cjohnston: I'm filing the bug. [22:06] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ci-services-itself/+bug/1274309 [22:06] Ubuntu bug 1274309 in Ubuntu CI Services "We shouldn't use the unity daily ppa anymore" [Undecided,Confirmed] [22:09] fginther: trying to land this MR, not sure what's going on with autopilot tests but dialer crashing it seems [22:09] fginther: https://code.launchpad.net/~boiko/dialer-app/fix_header_update/+merge/203826 [22:09] fginther: is this the same problem you guys have been seeing? [22:15] bfiller: that's the same issue as ^