| === ara is now known as Guest80428 | ||
| === Cimi_ is now known as Cimi | ||
| * duflu wonders if the Atom will finish building Mir today | 09:43 | |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 | ||
| duflu | Awesome. Mir on an old Intel Atom is super-responsive, compositing at 60FPS. If only it wasn't also suffering a bug; https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1275398 | 10:05 |
|---|---|---|
| === ubot5` is now known as ubot5 | ||
| alan_g | fast, works - chose any one. :( | 10:09 |
| duflu | alan_g: Well, moving sofrware surfaces around is faster and smoother than anything I've ever seen on a old netbook. It's kind of exciting | 10:10 |
| duflu | software too | 10:10 |
| alan_g | Any clue about the GL clients failing? | 10:11 |
| duflu | alan_g: Possibly missing GL extenions (the ones used to load GL images into textures) | 10:13 |
| duflu | Ah. And Mir is just as fast as LXDE, without the ugly tearing of LXDE :) | 10:13 |
| alan_g | So failing to check result codes is the first thing | 10:13 |
| duflu | alan_g: Yep | 10:15 |
| duflu | But another day | 10:15 |
| alan_g | Sure. Nice it works so well otherwise | 10:16 |
| alan_g | slangasek: you were raising a protobuf issue yesterday? | 10:43 |
| duflu | alan_g: He logged it as https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1275372 | 10:45 |
| anpok | i have one of those - currently only runnig lxde because all other environments are two slow | 12:15 |
| === larva is now known as Guest59937 | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| rsalveti | alf_: hey, remember we discussed a way to dynamically load a mir backend instead of making that decision in build-time? this was part of the emulator discussion https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/core-1311-ubuntu-touch-for-x86 | 13:49 |
| rsalveti | basically we now need mir to work with the android backend on x86 as well | 13:49 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === 14WAB1TAR is now known as vila | ||
| dandrader | alan_g|lunch, so to add my own messages on top of the regular ones in the mir socket I've to extend ProtobufSessionCreator and ProtobufMessageProcessor? | 14:58 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| slangasek | alan_g: hi there - yes, I've inadvertently started a Mir-affecting protobuf transition in trusty; and mir doesn't pass its test suite with the new one (bug #1275372). Is this something you could help with fixing, so we can go forward instead of backwards with the protobuf transition? | 15:23 |
| ubot5 | bug 1275372 in Mir "mir: FTBFS in trusty-proposed, tests fail against libprotobuf8" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1275372 | 15:24 |
| slangasek | alan_g: (if not, then the right thing to do is to back out the protobuf transition so it doesn't block mir landings) | 15:24 |
| alan_g | slangasek: yes. I'll help. Been wondering what the easiest way to grab the protobuf update to test without breaking other work (the error just looks unrelated) | 15:25 |
| slangasek | alan_g: well, you can grab the new protobuf from trusty-proposed; as for it looking unrelated, I did a test build with protobuf as the only difference, and it passed with the old one and fails with the new | 15:26 |
| alan_g | slangasek: I believe you. (Just makes it hard to guess what's wrong) | 15:27 |
| racarr | Morning | 15:31 |
| kgunn | racarr: your alarm clock is still broken :) | 15:32 |
| racarr | wait no now it's 7:33 right | 15:33 |
| racarr | yes | 15:33 |
| kgunn | alan_g: just sitting here thinking about your discussion with slangasek... | 15:35 |
| kgunn | alan_g: so since we're already in a build pickle with platform-api blocking us... | 15:36 |
| kgunn | alan_g: ok...nvmd...i thot it thru, we just have to merge that back into dev | 15:37 |
| kgunn | actually the whole trunk back into dev | 15:37 |
| kgunn | not as bad as i originally thot | 15:37 |
| alan_g | kgunn: Just think of "dev" as the trunk and "trunk" as a release branch and it feels more normal | 15:40 |
| === xnox_ is now known as xnox | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| === larva is now known as Guest59640 | ||
| alan_g | slangasek: How are you running the tests? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/+bug/1275372/comments/1 | 16:59 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1275372 in Mir "mir: FTBFS in trusty-proposed, tests fail against libprotobuf8" [Critical,Triaged] | 16:59 |
| slangasek | alan_g: as part of the package build | 17:00 |
| slangasek | alan_g: reproducible with a native build on x86 | 17:00 |
| === jono is now known as Guest16175 | ||
| alan_g | slangasek: I've tried on x86 - still CNR - we are doing something differently | 17:05 |
| slangasek | alan_g: output of "dpkg -l '*protobuf*' | grep ^ii" in your build environment? | 17:05 |
| slangasek | alan_g: you aren't passing 'DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck' in your environment (because of cross-builds), are you? | 17:06 |
| alan_g | $ dpkg -l '*protobuf*' | grep ^ii | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii libmirprotobuf-dev:i386 0.1.3+14.04.20140108-0ubuntu1 i386 Display server for Ubuntu - protocol definition | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii libmirprotobuf0:i386 0.1.3+14.04.20140108-0ubuntu1 i386 Display server for Ubuntu - protocol implementation | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii libprotobuf-dev:i386 2.5.0-5ubuntu1 i386 protocol buffers C++ library (development files) | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii libprotobuf-lite8:i386 2.5.0-5ubuntu1 i386 protocol buffers C++ library (lite version) | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii libprotobuf7:i386 2.4.1-3ubuntu4 i386 protocol buffers C++ library | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii libprotobuf8:i386 2.5.0-5ubuntu1 i386 protocol buffers C++ library | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii protobuf-compiler 2.5.0-5ubuntu1 i386 compiler for protocol buffer definition files | 17:06 |
| alan_g | ii python-protobuf 2.5.0-5ubuntu1 all Python bindings for protocol buffers | 17:07 |
| alan_g | slangasek: I'm just doing "make -j4 && ctest" | 17:07 |
| slangasek | alan_g: please use debian/rules build | 17:07 |
| alan_g | slangasek: ok | 17:07 |
| slangasek | alan_g: correction: 'fakeroot debian/rules binary' | 17:07 |
| alan_g | slangasek: running (but that takes a while to run) | 17:11 |
| slangasek | alan_g: yep, understood | 17:11 |
| slangasek | alan_g: fwiw, the relevant test call in debian/rules is this: GTEST_OUTPUT=xml:./ dh_auto_test --max-parallel=1 | 17:12 |
| slangasek | (once the package build has run through once, you should be able to call that directly to iterate) | 17:12 |
| slangasek | alan_g: any luck? | 17:32 |
| alan_g | buiid at 97% | 17:33 |
| slangasek | ok | 17:33 |
| * slangasek sits on his hands ;) | 17:33 | |
| alan_g | slangasek: it finished successfully. But I don't see any test run in backscroll | 17:37 |
| alan_g | The unit test binary passes (with LD_PRELOAD) | 17:39 |
| alan_g | And so does "GTEST_OUTPUT=xml:./ dh_auto_test --max-parallel=1" | 17:40 |
| slangasek | alan_g: ok, so 'GTEST_OUTPUT=xml:./ dh_auto_test --max-parallel=1' passes without any LD_PRELOAD? | 17:41 |
| slangasek | alan_g: I noticed that you were on i386... I was testing on amd64. Could be that has an effect here | 17:42 |
| slangasek | let me try to reproduce on i386; can you try to reproduce on amd64? | 17:42 |
| alan_g | slangasek: I can try - but EOD for me is 18min away | 17:43 |
| slangasek | mmk | 17:43 |
| * alan_g still thinks this would be a very strange effect of protobuf changes | 17:47 | |
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| alan_g | slangasek: left it building - will check back when I get a minute (after supper) | 18:04 |
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| alan_g|EOD | slangasek: works on amd64 | 18:33 |
| slangasek | curious | 18:33 |
| slangasek | my i386 build is still running, let's see what happens | 18:34 |
| === jono is now known as Guest82971 | ||
| racarr | Is freenode acting weird? | 19:44 |
| racarr | No | 19:44 |
| ogra_ | racarr, it was for most of the day | 19:45 |
| ogra_ | they had a DDOS | 19:45 |
| === quickert is now known as Ranomier | ||
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| === kgunn is now known as Guest438 | ||
| popey | hello mir people. | 21:18 |
| popey | how far away is screencasting mir? | 21:20 |
| anpok | currently being worked on, i.e. there is a mp https://code.launchpad.net/~afrantzis/mir/mir-screencast-server-frontend/+merge/203809 in progress, another one for the client api has been merged alreadn, then there will probably be one or two more for platform support | 21:30 |
| anpok | correct details when alf_ is back online :) | 21:31 |
| slangasek | what the what | 21:44 |
| slangasek | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/0.1.3+14.04.20140108-0ubuntu2 | 21:44 |
| slangasek | why is cmake now broken? | 21:44 |
| slangasek | hmm | 21:45 |
| slangasek | because I uploaded from a dirty tree, sigh | 21:45 |
| anpok | popey: I am the wrong one to ask | 21:45 |
| popey | k | 21:46 |
| anpok | maybe someone on -unity knows whether thats planned or in progress.. | 21:47 |
| Guest438 | popey: it will be a raw vid stream of what's happening on screen, no plan to show where you touched or swiped | 23:37 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!