[00:24] <Noskcaj> Logan_, any chance you could review something for me?
[00:24] <Noskcaj> lp:~noskcaj/+junk/gnome-weather
[00:24] <Noskcaj> It's needed for ubuntu-gnome
[00:47] <Logan_> Noskcaj: why not Debian?
[02:50] <Noskcaj> Logan_, Debian won't take stuff with CC-BY-2.0 licenses
[03:04] <Logan_> Noskcaj: what have other MOTUs' responses been?
[03:04] <Logan_> and can I see the discussion in Debian about the license?
[03:04] <Logan_> since it seems to be maintained in a Debian repository
[03:05] <Noskcaj> I've not contacted other MOTUs yet, but debian and the ubuntu-gnome head dev suggested this way/
[03:05] <Logan_> hmm
[03:07] <Noskcaj> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703150 is upstream bug
[06:13] <Noskcaj> Could someone please review lp:~noskcaj/+junk/gnome-weather
[08:29] <darkxst> anyone able to upload lp:~noskcaj/+junk/gnome-weather to trusty NEW?
[08:30] <darkxst> its a sync from debian SVN, but can't go into debian due to CC-BY licensed artwork
[08:52] <geser> does Ubuntu accept this license?
[08:53] <geser> any reason why you didn't preserve the debian changelog? (or didn't exist any?)
[09:33] <darkxst> geser, plenty of CC-BY stuff in ubuntu
[09:34] <darkxst> there was a changelog for 3.8, no idea why Noskcaj didnt include that
[09:34] <darkxst> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-gnome/packages/experimental/gnome-weather/debian/changelog?view=co
[09:48] <mitya57> darkxst: plenty of CC-BY *2.0* licensed stuff?
[09:51]  * mitya57 wonders if optimization done by pkgbinarymangler is a derived/collective work
[09:52] <darkxst> mitya57, ok, don't know about plenty, but have definitely seen some in universe
[09:53] <mitya57> Can that artwork be just patched out?
[09:53] <darkxst> mitya57, its weather icons, app is nothing without them!
[09:59] <mitya57> OK, as a short term solution I think it's fine to have these in Ubuntu.
[09:59] <mitya57> I will maybe upload it in the evening, if noone else does that before me.
[10:01] <mitya57> By the way you really should use the sponsoring queue :)
[10:01] <darkxst> mitya57, I only have really limited upload rights, just desktop-extras
[10:02] <mitya57> But you still can file a bug and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors...
[10:03] <darkxst> where exactly would one file a bug on a non-existent package though?
[10:04] <mitya57> Against "ubuntu" project.
[10:04] <darkxst> ok
[10:04] <geser> darkxst: against Ubuntu, like all the RFP lingering there
[11:46] <mitya57> Noskcaj, darkxst: uploaded
[19:38] <ESphynx> hey guys, is there a way by now to mark a build-dependency as optional?
[19:39] <jtaylor> you shouldn'T do that
[19:39] <jtaylor> builds should be reproducable, optional dependencies would negate that
[19:39] <ESphynx> in an ideal world upx-ucl would be available on arm and not break my builds :P
[19:39] <jtaylor> it is only used for bootstraping for staged builds
[19:39] <ESphynx> jtaylor: I would like optiona if it exists at all on the platform.
[19:39] <jtaylor> you can remove arches from build depends
[19:40] <jtaylor> [!arch]
[19:40] <ESphynx> but gotta do that one by one and that's annoying as heck
[19:40] <jtaylor> you can also list the ones it works on I think
[19:40] <ESphynx> so how would I add that
[19:41] <ESphynx> upx-ucl [!ppc64el] [!arm64],   ?
[19:42] <jtaylor> if it never built on an arch just don'T care
[19:42] <jtaylor> it doesn'T harm migration
[19:43] <jtaylor> [!ppc64el !arm64] I think
[19:43] <ESphynx> it built before on arm64 and on powerpc
[19:43] <jtaylor> see gcc source that should have a few examples
[19:43] <ESphynx> not sure how ppc64el is related
[19:44] <ESphynx> ah, no it never built on arm64 that's new
[19:44] <ESphynx> still, I'd like the opportunity to have the build attempted so I can fix any problems
[19:45] <ESphynx> our project is a cross-platform SDK after all so it has to be as portable as possible ;)
[20:02] <ESphynx> thanks jtaylor :P