/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/02/08/#kubuntu-devel.txt

ahoneybunsays I dont have00:00
ahoneybunPermission denied (publickey).00:00
ahoneybun'00:00
valoriesame here; stuff not set up yet00:00
valorienot sure I have my ssh key properly uploaded00:03
valorieor on this machine, actually00:03
ahoneybunuploaded where?00:05
valorieto the identity server00:05
ahoneybunkde identity00:05
ahoneybun?00:05
valoriejust as you have to do on launchpad00:05
valorieof course00:05
ahoneybunspeaking of00:06
ahoneybunlp I need to upload my new one00:06
* ahoneybun looks for place on his kde identity account00:08
ahoneybunI can't find the place on my account for ssh keys00:10
* ahoneybun makes bugs.kde.org account00:10
valoriethe stuff about ssh is here: http://techbase.kde.org/Contribute/Get_a_Contributor_Account00:15
valoriedo you have a developer account, not just an identity account?00:16
valorieyou have to apply, and be supported by a developer00:16
ahoneybunno because I;m not really a dev00:16
* valorie has one, and I guess am now going to learn to use it00:17
valorieyes you are a developer; of the docs00:17
ahoneybunoh00:17
ahoneybunwell then I need a backer00:17
valorieright, such as Riddell or apachelogger00:17
ahoneybunyea.00:26
valorieok, pizza time00:52
ahoneybunapachelogger: Riddell would either of you give me your support for a dev account on KDE Identity?03:19
ahoneybunhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clementine/+bug/127779604:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1277796 in clementine (Ubuntu) "[Kubuntu] Update to 1.2" [Undecided,New]04:12
ahoneybunhey valorie04:41
valoriehey04:41
ahoneybunlordievader: you there?04:41
valorieI was reading up on git, but my brain is rebelling04:41
valorieso I'm giving up for the night04:41
ahoneybunyea04:41
valorieI think I'm getting it04:41
ahoneybunI'm just going to wait till a dev can maybe support me for the dev application04:42
valoriebut once I've successfully cloned I'll be happy04:42
ahoneybunyea of courses04:43
ahoneybun*course04:43
valoriethen to figure out how to make changes and push them04:44
valorieahoneybun: what do you think about how many changes will need to be made before release?04:45
valorieare we up to date with 14.4?04:45
valorieI'm thinking of the slides in particular04:45
ahoneybunwell I saw that the installation page has been updated with 14.4 slides04:46
ahoneybunor at least in the pdf04:46
valorieok, is the text in line with the slides?04:46
ahoneybuntext?04:46
valoriebecause if we are ready, I'll write to the translators04:46
valorieit would be nice to have some more 100% translated files04:46
ahoneybunI just notice the text on the slides04:47
ahoneybunwait04:47
valoriewell, our verbiage has to match perfectly IMO04:48
valorieanything else is confusing to people04:48
ahoneybunonly one slide is 14.4 the others are 13.404:48
valorieboo04:48
ahoneybunwe need up to date screenshots04:49
valorieyes04:49
valorieour number one priority, IMO, is to make sure *everything* is up to date04:49
ahoneybunguess I need to write to the devel list for those04:49
ahoneybunor install trusty in a vm and get my self04:50
ahoneybun*myself04:50
ahoneybunabout verbiage04:50
ahoneybunsome of us are european so we have different spelling04:50
ahoneybunlike a z in the place of a s04:50
ahoneybunorganisation -> organization04:51
valoriewe use the american spelling04:53
valorieKDE does, ubuntu does, and so do we04:53
* ahoneybun is trying to randomize his songs in amarok04:53
valoriethere are two ways to do that -- shuffle, or set for random play04:54
ahoneybunwhich one is american the s or z04:54
valorienot sure; check dict04:54
valoriez is murrican I think04:54
ahoneybundarn amarok04:55
valorieanyway, that's why there is en_gb04:55
valorieand just plain en04:55
* ahoneybun just realized that the amarok documentation is not in kubuntu 13.1004:55
valoriewhat?04:56
valorieare you kidding me?04:56
ahoneybunscreenshot?04:56
valorieI mean, I don't package it, but it should have been in the tarball04:56
ahoneybunamarok handbook is not in khelpcenter04:57
valorieI'll be damned, you are right04:58
valoriethe linkage must be wrong, because it is there04:58
valoriecould you please file a bug about this, ahoneybun?04:58
ahoneybunsure04:58
ahoneybunHarald Sitter04:58
ahoneybunPhonon, Lord-President of KDE Multimedia (apachelogger)04:58
ahoneybunlol04:58
ahoneybunwould that be kde or kubuntu?04:59
ahoneybunand/or khelpcenter or amarok?04:59
ahoneybunwhy in the world is there no random/shuffle button in the main menu05:01
valorieI don't know where the problem lies05:01
valoriefile it in launchpad for now05:01
* ahoneybun looks05:01
valoriewe'll see05:01
ahoneybunwell we would have to see if it does it just in kubuntu05:02
valorieright05:03
ahoneybunhard to found out where the problem is05:07
valoriekhelpcenter needs a lot of help itself05:07
ahoneybunoh?05:08
ahoneybun"The requested documentation was not found on your computer."05:08
ahoneybunso looking in the wrong location then05:08
valoriecould be a packaging problem05:09
valoriehard to say05:09
ahoneybunhard to look if we don;t know the file name05:12
ahoneybunI think it is index.html05:12
ahoneybunas you can find it on docs.kde.org05:12
ahoneybunwell the khelpcenter says report it to bugs.kde.org 05:13
valorieok05:13
ahoneybunbut it might be a package issue on our end05:14
valorieyup05:15
valoriesec05:15
ahoneybunI think this is where the khelpcenter files are /usr/share/doc/kde/HTML/en/05:21
ahoneybunseems to have happened before https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27586905:22
ubottuKDE bug 275869 in Documentation "Missing documentation pages in Amarok" [Normal,Resolved: duplicate]05:22
ahoneybunhttp://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/all/amarok-doc/filelist it is in saucy05:24
ahoneybunomg05:25
ahoneybunit is not installed by default05:26
ahoneybuninstalling to see if that is the problem (most likely is)05:29
ahoneybunvalorie: it is because the amarok-doc package is not installed05:38
valorieweird05:47
valorieso is that packaging, or was it not included in the tarball?05:48
ahoneybunyea I installed that package and it shows the docs now05:48
ahoneybunwell it is packageed05:48
ahoneybunso it is not included in the iso05:48
valorieif it wasn't there, then the amarok-devel list is the place to write to05:48
ahoneybunwhich would be on our side05:48
ahoneybunanyway I'm going to sleep05:51
ahoneybunalmost 1am here05:51
valorieah, so we have the package, but it's not marked as depends05:51
ahoneybunyea05:52
valorieprobably just recommends05:52
valorienot sure if that's good or not05:52
ahoneybunyea I believe so05:52
valoriekhelpcenter should say so05:52
ahoneybunhttp://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/all/amarok-doc/filelist05:53
ahoneybunrecommands05:53
valoriekhelpcenter should say: to see this doc, install it05:53
ahoneybunyea anyway good night05:53
valoriesweet dreams05:54
ahoneybunyou too. /away05:54
jarkko_i just rebooted i have been installing lots of kubuntu repo stuff lately...i just got powermanager for my keyboard...07:03
apacheloggerahoneybun: why dev account?08:34
apacheloggerah08:36
apacheloggerahoneybun, valorie: you don't have to do anything on git :P08:36
apacheloggergit only contains the packaging08:36
valoriebut that's the way to see the package, right?08:43
valorieor to submit a patch08:43
* valorie is still watching the olympics08:44
valorieaustria had a nice big delegation08:44
valoriewoah, swiss are a sea of red08:47
dp_can i help kde with something. please let me know if i can contribute in n e manner08:51
lordievaderapachelogger: popey 08:51
dp_:-)08:51
lordievaderEhh too early in the morning, sorry for ^08:51
lordievaderahoneybun: pong08:51
valorieoh my goodness, playing Tartu as the russians enter08:52
valoriehow ironic08:52
valoriedp_: we can always use a hand08:52
valorieplease look at our website, esp. the contribute part08:52
dp_let me know what can i do?08:52
dp_sure08:53
valorieand pitch in where you would like!08:53
dp_sounds great08:53
valoriewe all have fun here08:53
valorieat least most of the time08:53
valorie:-)08:53
valorieok, off for the night08:54
dp_can n e one help me get this link. the one valorie just posted above?08:58
dp_esp.??????????????\08:58
lordievaderGood morning.09:08
sneledp_: http://www.kubuntu.org/community , contribute part is at bottom of the page ;)09:47
dp_tx snele...:-)09:51
BluesKajHiyas all11:31
=== soee__ is now known as soee
kdeuser56is there a package that enables oxygen for qt5 applications in trusty?14:12
=== ghostcube_ is now known as ghostcube
shadeslayerkdeuser56: nope14:18
shadeslayerhasn't been ported afaik14:18
kdeuser56is it possible to have it in trusty?14:20
kdeuser56or is it technically not possible?14:20
shadeslayerit hasn't been ported to Qt5, so someone needs to port it first14:24
shadeslayeror maybe it has, but there are no plans to package kde-workspace with KF5/Qt5 in trusty14:25
shadeslayermight have been ported : https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kde-workspace/repository/revisions/master/show/kstyles/oxygen14:26
kdeuser56i have read somewhere kdelibs would have to be built against qt5 to have oxygen for qt5 applications ... 14:28
kdeuser56shadeslayer: it has been ported to KF5: http://hugo-kde.blogspot.co.at/2013/08/some-news-from-oxygen-world.html14:30
kdeuser56my question was if it would be possible to have two versions of oxygen running: one for qt5 applications and one for qt4 ones14:31
shadeslayerkdeuser56: I /think/ so14:50
shadeslayerit most certainly will be co-installable14:51
shadeslayerkdeuser56: I recommend asking in #oxygen14:51
kdeuser56shadeslayer: nice14:51
kdeuser56shadeslayer: maybe i will do that later ... if I find out how, would you create a package?14:52
shadeslayerkdeuser56: nope14:52
shadeslayerlike I said, no plans to ship KF5/PW2 in the archive14:52
shadeslayerbut we have Neon 5 and Packages from KF5 tech release14:53
shadeslayers/release/preview/14:53
kubotushadeslayer meant: "but we have Neon 5 and Packages from KF5 tech preview"14:53
shadeslayerin the Kubuntu experimental PPA14:53
shadeslayergtg14:53
kdeuser56shadeslayer: okay thanks14:53
ScottKRiddell: We'd want to do 12.04.5, right?15:46
RiddellScottK: if it was happening yeah we'd be part of it, I don't have any special desire for it to happen15:58
Riddellahoneybun: sure I'd support you getting a dev account for kde15:58
ahoneybunRiddell: you know I need it to see the work apachelogger is doing on the docs mostly16:09
Riddellahoneybun: mm do you?16:10
ahoneybunmm?16:10
Riddelldoes it give you magic powers on the wiki?16:10
ahoneybunmagic powers?16:11
Riddellahoneybun: how does it let you see the work apachelogger is doing on the docs?16:12
ahoneybunwell I do not have permission as it is on the git.kde.org16:12
ahoneybunI mean someone could just upload the work to dropbox sure16:13
Riddellahoneybun: anyone can look at kde git16:13
ahoneybunI can;t16:13
ahoneybunwell I try to clone it and says permission denied16:14
Riddellahoneybun: what url?16:14
ahoneybun git@git.kde.org:scratch/sitter/kubuntu-docs16:14
ahoneybunthinking now it might come down to apachelogger letting me in16:15
Riddellahoneybun: git clone git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/sitter/kubuntu-docs16:16
ahoneybunoh16:18
ahoneybuncrap16:18
Peace-guys how to slap with konversation ?16:18
Peace-xD16:18
ahoneybunseems that work16:18
ahoneybunthat is all the docs in there?16:20
ahoneybunRiddell: why is amarok-doc not a depend of amarok?>16:20
ahoneybundifferent topic16:21
ahoneybunhttp://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/all/amarok-doc16:22
apacheloggerahoneybun: because it's too huge16:45
ahoneybunapachelogger: amarok-doc?16:46
apacheloggeryes16:46
ahoneybunwell when you try to access the amarok handbook it opens khelpcenter will "documentation not found" it should say "install the amarok-docs package" with instructions on how to do that16:47
apacheloggeryes it should16:48
apacheloggerexcept no one has created any such ability16:48
ahoneybunvalorie suggested that16:48
ahoneybunI see16:49
ahoneybunapachelogger: so there is about 5 langs beside english on the docs?17:20
ScottKRiddell: Looks like it'll likely happen.  Thanks.17:39
Riddellapachelogger: in l10n_language.h why the need for explicit? you're afraid of some implicit parameter type convertion?17:43
ScottKkdeconnect-kde SRU still needs verification.17:48
ahoneybunyofel: how is the tomahawk 0.7 package?17:49
soeewhat package contains H.264 decoder ?17:56
Riddellapachelogger: if I run18:15
Riddellsudo apt-get remove kde-l10n-engb18:15
Riddellthen run demo18:15
Riddellit still returns l10n.isSupportComplete()  as true18:15
Riddellapachelogger: no documentation for Locale(const QList<QString> &kdeLanguageCodes, const QString &country); ?18:22
Riddellapachelogger: "Constructs a Locale from a predefined set of languages and a country" what happens if you give it more than one language? surely 1 locale can only have 1 language?18:23
Riddellapachelogger: I think I'd like some comment to explain the purpose of export.h18:25
Riddellapachelogger: but otherwise I think it's a work of perfection18:50
=== JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose
apacheloggerRiddell: thank you :*21:59
apacheloggerthe engb thing is curious22:00
apacheloggergonna add a testcase to keep on top of it22:00
apacheloggeren_GB and en_US mapping is tediously complex :/22:00
apacheloggerahoneybun: no localization is complete as yuri pointed out22:02
apacheloggerdocs need to be "frozen" i.e. finished and not changed, and translators need to be asked to translate away22:02
apacheloggerI expect valorie knows more on the process there22:02
valorieI know what he said, and as I said last night, our #1 priority right now should be checking the docs for accuracy against 14.0422:05
valoriewe need up-to-date slides and screenies for starters22:05
apacheloggerahoneybun: ^ 22:06
valorieoh, we already talked last night, we agree about it22:10
valorieperhaps next week I can upgrade to alpha 2 on the other box and take some screenies22:17
ronnocahoneybun: I am going to file a bug to KDE requesting that if a help file is missing, there is some (at minimum) generic message that is user-friendly that tells them that the help file is missing and that it should be installed by the user. Having KHelpcenter simply say "The requested documentation was not found on your computer" is NOT very user-friendly.23:33
ronnocas referenced here long ago by appachelogger in this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-runtime/+bug/284915/comments/223:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 284915 in ktorrent (Ubuntu) "Khelpcenter missing docs list" [Low,Triaged]23:36
ronnocs/appachelogger/apachelogger23:37
valoriewe lack someone to love on khelpcenter23:37
valorieapachelogger tried to work on it at some point, but fled the brokenness23:38
valorieeven an error message that says, there *may be* a help file, and where to look -- that would be helpful23:39
ronnocapachelogger: however since we now only ship iso's on DVD size, I think any available help docs should be installed by default if the application is to come on the standard iso, size be dammed :)23:39
ronnocvalorie: I agree. the only other option would seem to be to make all -doc files as reccomends23:40
ronnocwhich i personally would be ok with23:40
valoriesure, but each method of installing has its own way of dealing with recommends23:41
valorieI'm not sure that is a solution23:41
ronnocwell it would take care of installing packages via Muon or Muon Discover, which is the default way we instruct people to install applications. People installing from command line probably know how to install a help file if needed, which they likely wouldn't23:43
ronnocand even in that case it would still show them in the terminal that a doc package is available23:43
ronnocfor now, I will just file the bug w/ KDE - it's a start23:44
ronnocSlightly -offtopic-, but <3 the way muon discover shows 'reccomends' as 'add-ons'. That's brilliant IMHO. 23:49
Riddellthere's no maintainer of khelpcentre, plenty people have said they're rewrite it but nobody has23:53
ronnocRiddell: :/23:56
ronnocthe code is THAT bad? ouch.23:57
Riddellit's more that documentation isn't that interesting to coders23:58
valorieimportant to our new users, though23:59
valorieI remember relying on and being disappointed often by the help center23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!