| hjd | Could someone take a look at bug 997743, especially the last comments? I am unsure whether this should be reopened or what should be done about it :) | 18:19 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 997743 in gradle (Ubuntu) "gradle depends on libtomcat6-java" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/997743 | 18:19 |
| teward | hjd, the bug would have to be opened against the release affected | 18:21 |
| teward | hjd, closing it because it's already fixed in 13.10 (and Trusty) is fine | 18:21 |
| teward | hjd, I do partly disagree with your backport request, though, from 13.10 it'd have to also work on 12.10 before it could get to 12.04. Unless they changed all the backport procedures since I requested a backport (which was a while ago) | 18:22 |
| hjd | teward: Ok, thanks. | 18:40 |
| hjd | teward: I used the standard replies for bugs fixed in later releases, and figured the changes would be too large for an SRU, but a backport might be possible. | 18:41 |
| hjd | teward: Any thoughts on whether I should mark libjetty-extra-java as also affected or whether that should be filed as a separate bug report? | 18:42 |
| teward | i wouldn't, unless it's the exact same bug. | 18:44 |
| teward | based on the bug here, I don't think they're the same bug | 18:44 |
| teward | (at least, not in my opinion) | 18:44 |
| teward | hjd, I'd suggest you also wait for otehrs' input on that, though | 18:44 |
| hjd | I see your point. One could argue the original bug is fixed, though due to the same problem further down in the stack the same error is still triggered. I wasn't sure what to decide though, so I thought I'd ask here. :) | 18:50 |
| penguin42 | 12.10 is EoL in April though isn't it? | 18:51 |
| Ampelbein | Yes. | 18:52 |
| penguin42 | IMHO it does make sense to backport something to 12.04 and doesn't really make much sense to backport something with ~2 months of life left | 18:53 |
| penguin42 | (even if that's technically what is the procedure for it) | 18:54 |
| teward | penguin42, then we wait for EOL | 18:57 |
| teward | s/we/they/ | 18:57 |
| penguin42 | teward: But similarly it's silly to delay a fix for an arbitrary boundary | 18:58 |
| teward | penguin42, i think that's up to the backports team. | 18:59 |
| teward | not you or I | 18:59 |
| penguin42 | agreed | 18:59 |
| penguin42 | but it would still be silly | 19:00 |
| hjd | Speaking of releases and EOL, now that 13.04 is EOL what is the recommended upgrade path for users still on 12.10? (Just curious how that works out...) | 19:00 |
| teward | hjd, raring is still in the repos right now, they can upgrade to raring and then to saucy | 19:01 |
| teward | (i think that was by-design to facilitate upgrading, but I'd have to ask -release or the repository admins if that's the case) | 19:01 |
| hjd | Ah, ok. | 19:07 |
| hjd | Probably intentional since raring had a shorter support period than saucy. | 19:08 |
| === Nafallo_ is now known as Nafallo | ||
| teward | i know i posted this in -motu, but still.... | 21:53 |
| teward | can someone help me out with getting this bug ready for SRU by approving the nomination for Saucy? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1264674 | 21:53 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1264674 in nginx (Ubuntu) "nginx segfault when adding add_header in configuration" [Undecided,Fix released] | 21:53 |
| teward | (only saucy is affected by this, and it's fixed in Trusty, hence fix released already) | 21:53 |
| teward | as soon as it's got the Saucy nomination approved, I'll work on the debdiffs | 21:54 |
| chilicuil | teward: I can technically do it (I'm part of the ubuntu-bugcontrol group just as you) http://i.imgur.com/hVecuYv.png, why don't do it yourself?, only motu|core members should do it? | 22:05 |
| teward | chilicuil, um... | 22:05 |
| teward | i think you misunderstand | 22:05 |
| teward | bugcontrol can NOMINATE | 22:05 |
| teward | members of ubuntu drivers and certain dev teams can approve | 22:05 |
| teward | i need the approve, not the nominate | 22:05 |
| teward | (if you look at the bug I already nominated for Saucy) | 22:05 |
| teward | i think I could *maybe* bug someone on the security team to approve | 22:06 |
| chilicuil | oh yeah, now I see, thanks for the explanation =) | 22:06 |
| teward | but i don't like bothering them for non-security bugs | 22:06 |
| rbasak | teward: done (mentioning here mainly so others see it) | 22:24 |
| teward | rbasak, thank you kindly. (you may also want to let -motu know you helped, since i asked there first) | 22:25 |
| teward | rbasak, i'll probably have a debdiff ready for that bug in a few hours, i'm in the middle of fighting my internet right now | 22:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
