[06:18] <pitti> Good morning
[10:01] <pitti> jibel: hm, I edited results.history on snakefruit for the third time to set the (wrongly) RUNNING subversion test to PASS
[10:01] <pitti> jibel: it seems I need to edit that someplace else, too?
[10:01] <jibel> pitti, let me check
[10:01] <pitti> something always sets it back and still seems to think it was running
[10:01]  * pitti fears doko's wrath for blocking gcc once again
[10:02] <jibel> pitti, remove the file [10:02] <jibel> oops
[10:02] <jibel> pitti, trusty-proposed_amd64_subversion.20140209-163514.state
[10:03] <jibel> in /home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/autopkgtest/data/adt/trusty-proposed/amd64/work
[10:03] <jibel> pitti, forced.
[10:04] <jibel> next run will change the result to pass
[10:04] <pitti> jibel: ah, all running tests have a .state file, and once it's gone it takes the value from results.history?
[10:04] <jibel> pitti, yes
[10:04] <pitti> jibel: what would have happened if I had removed the .state file and then edited results.history?
[10:04] <jibel> pitti, that's part of what is wrong in the logic
[10:05] <jibel> pitti, it would have work. Results in history are overwritten if version in the state file are identical
[10:28] <pitti> jibel: thanks; do you know why the .state file still had RUNNING? was it updated from a wrong source, or was the problem that it wasn't updated at all?
[11:06] <jibel> pitti, this happens when one of the dep tested is older than the dep requested. Which I don't understand because they both use ftpmaster
[11:09] <davmor2> Morning all
[13:34] <jibel> robotfuel, hey, I'm reviewing lp:~chris.gagnon/messaging-app/autopilot-tests, on mako, autopilot finds no tests, is there a anything else than ubuntuuitoolkit to install or setup?
[13:37] <pitti> jibel: without having seen it, presumably ofono-phonesim-autostart ?
[13:43] <jibel> pitti, much better, thanks!
[14:10] <elopio> good morning!
[14:22] <pitti> hey elopio, how are you?
[14:24] <elopio> pitti: I'm thinking I should have stayed on bed today :)
[14:25] <elopio> so many pings and I still can't fully open my eyes.
[14:25] <elopio> pitti: how are you?
[14:25] <pitti> elopio: heh, I know the feeling; good luck!
[14:25] <pitti> elopio: I'm quite fine, thanks
[16:00] <cgoldberg> balloons, do you have a list of all the Core Apps by Launchpad name?  I'm making a new gource video ...
[16:00] <cgoldberg> balloons, this is the list I used last time:  https://gist.github.com/cgoldberg/7516510
[16:00] <cgoldberg> any new apps added since?
[16:01] <balloons> let me look
[16:03] <balloons> cgoldberg, lp:reminders-app..
[16:03] <cgoldberg> k
[16:03] <balloons> I think the rest looks correct
[16:04] <cgoldberg> great, thanks
[16:33] <senan> Good Evening All :)
[16:33] <senan> balloons, DanChapman, Hey
[16:33] <senan> DanChapman, Can you check this code  http://paste.ubuntu.com/6909994/ ?
[17:37] <DanChapman> hey senan sure just looking now
[17:43] <DanChapman> senan, it needs to assert the number of items in the pathbar is correct also the idea of selecting a GtkLabel by it's label value and then asserting the label is value you used to select it seems kind of odd to me :-)
[17:44] <DanChapman> balloons, hey how was your weekend?
[17:44] <balloons> DanChapman, howdy! Short, but nice
[17:45] <DanChapman> balloons, awesome :-p have you looked at the ubiquity results today :-O i think it needs reverting. I'm wondering if polling on the same object is causing the issue
[17:55] <balloons> DanChapman, no  I haven't hehe
[17:57] <cgoldberg> balloons, new gource video is up :)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6mzRqoN21w
[18:06] <balloons> ohh, it' s all synced, hehe.. cool
[18:08] <cgoldberg> ... and the music is Free (Creative Commons)... so I won't get a takedown notice from Google
[19:08] <balloons> DanChapman, so I guess since nothing changed we simply revert? The testrun I see didn't run for long -- are you sure it worked?
[19:09] <knome> balloons, anything else we need to do re: logos?
[19:14] <DanChapman> balloons, yes i'm sure they all got to the slideshow/progresspage and segfaulted. Just gonna have some dinner then i will revert it :-) I'm gonna try and reproduce it aswell as the change seems to have exagerated the issue so hopefully it can be reproduced :-D
[19:19] <balloons> knome, I pinged stgraber and bdmurray about them.. You made all the sizes we needed
[19:19] <balloons> I don't have control over every group
[19:20] <balloons> DanChapman, oO.. making it worse means potential reproduction
[19:20] <knome> balloons, ok. is there anything else than the LP groups to worry about?'
[19:22] <balloons> knome, good question actually. The wiki is in good shape, outside of that.. Ohh, there is one logo we could use
[19:22] <balloons> the G+ page logo isn't properly sized
[19:23] <knome> what size do you need there then?
[20:21] <balloons> knome, googling says The maximum image dimensions are 2120 x 1192, but you can upload a cover image as small as 480 x 270. The recommended image size is 1080×608.
[20:22] <knome> right, that one
[20:22] <knome> stoopid image. :)
[20:22] <knome> i'll get back to you later today.
[20:23] <balloons> yea, that one.. they keep changing the size. Perhaps what is there is good enough now
[21:00] <knome> balloons, if https://plus.google.com/communities/114878029820171227880 is the only place it's shown in a bigger size, it's okay
[21:01] <balloons> excellent
[21:01] <knome> i hate the g+ image clipping, basically you will need to create an image that is suboptimal in every size except one
[21:20] <balloons> knome, yes exactly. You can't make a good image.. they'll just stretch and pull it around to fit all sorts of things.. while looking horrible :-)
[21:21] <knome> "just stretching" is okay
[21:21] <knome> but in large sizes, the both stretch it *and* duplicate some parts of it
[21:21] <knome> so you can't really put any part of a logo in the left section
[22:56] <thomi> balloons: who was looking in to adding delayed assertions in autopilot late last year?
[22:57] <thomi> balloons: well, whoever it was, it's now landed - go nuts! http://www.tech-foo.net/delayed-assertions-in-python-testtools.html
[23:04] <balloons> thomi, !!!
[23:04] <thomi> o/
[23:04] <balloons> thomi, sweetness, DanChapman was the one who wanted it.. we wanted it for ubiquity
[23:04] <balloons> good stuff, ty
[23:05] <thomi> well, it should be good to go in trusty right now