=== scottb is now known as zz_scottb [01:18] Hey guys [01:18] anyone know why Eagle shows up when you search in the software center but if you click on it it cannot be found? === TheLordOfTime is now known as teward [05:52] Hi, was "nautilus side-pane tree view" removed in Trusty? I can't find it anymore... [05:52] Or, is there any other way to see the tree of directories etc in the side pane? It helps a lot when one wants to move around files and folders... [07:22] Thank you for all your hard work people! [10:38] Will memtest86+ be updated to version 5.01 in Trusty? [10:38] (or "uploaded to" Trusty, if you prefer) [11:11] hi all [11:11] i m on ubuntu 14.04 and the last update destroyed my german keyboard layout [11:12] i had chaged it via loadkeys but nothing has happend [11:17] is there anything i can try to restore the layout_ [11:28] the symbols/de was not changed through the update [11:37] 'Morning all === om26er_ is now known as om26er [16:03] any idea why i dont get any updates to firefox since 25.0? [16:03] i'm using 14.04 [16:04] dpkg noob here again. I get " [16:04] /build/buildd/ccnx-0.8.1/debian/tmp/usr/local/include does not exist. Please mkdir -p /build/buildd/ccnx-0.8.1/debian/tmp/usr/local/include if this is what you intended. " [16:05] however I added usr/local/includee to debian/dirs [16:12] anyone? [16:21] saying "anyone" is pointless [16:32] ikonia your comment was also pointless [16:33] not really, it informs someone that it's not going to get any help as if they didn't see the question "anyone" won't help them understand it, or if they don't know the question saying "anyone" won't make them know the answer [16:35] tilppis1: I've only just joined, I didn't see your original question........ [16:36] it was about my firefox version still being 25.0 on ubuntu 14.04 [16:36] Version 27 is in proposed I believe [16:37] ah ok, i was kinda wondering if there's a delay in ubuntu's development versions [16:38] thanks though [16:39] I've just checked and it is. I've no doubt the developers have a reason for keeping it there ;) [16:41] PaulW2U, tilppis1 - tests failing: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html [16:44] brendand: thanks :) [16:44] thanks === supauli is now known as susundberg [18:53] hello [19:22] hello [19:22] help [19:23] with [19:23] ? [19:23] gnome-shell panel no func [19:23] mi english is so so [19:24] I do not work well after gnome-shell update [19:24] I have ubuntu 14.04 and kernel [19:24] Linux-Satellite-L505 arielsanflo 3.13.0-8-generic # 27-Ubuntu SMP Fri February 7 2:01:37 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU / Linux [19:25] firefox isn't displaying some buttons and icons correctly here on 14.04, appears to be a GTK icons problem from what i can see. like so: http://wstaw.org/m/2014/02/11/snapshot2.png [19:39] No problems here... Do you have your GTK2 theme set to Oxygen? Try setting it to something else, applying, and setting it back to Oxygen. [19:39] (Assuming, of course, that Oxygen is the theme you intend to use for that...) [19:40] h264 won't work on Firefox on 14.04 :( [19:40] Anyone? [19:42] Nothing_Much: I don't think h264 will work in Firefox until Firefox 28, but I may be wrong about that... [19:43] mamarley: I had Firefox I think down to version 24 with the media.gstreamer.enabled configuration to true and it worked, I do have the ubuntu restricted extras installed as well. [19:43] I'm on Firefox 26 at the moment and the gstreamer in the about:config is set to true [19:44] mamarley, using kde desktop but the gtk settings in system settings>application appearance are set to oxygen gtk [19:49] Is there a firefox support channel? [19:49] #firefox [19:50] BluesKaj: Yeah, that's what I meant. In the KDE configuration for GTK settings, change it to some other theme and then change it back. A few times I have encountered that issue too. [19:52] mamarley, yeah, ialready switched to some other themes and back, but no joy :/ [19:52] Sorry, I am out of ideas then :( [19:53] help [19:54] arielsanflo: What's up? [19:54] well, it's not a big deal , but it is annoying , mamarley [19:55] to update my ubuntu 14.04 with gnome-shell to try to see the applications pane I get halfway around the gnome-shell panel help [19:55] mi english is so so [19:56] the problem continued and frequent applications panel works well [19:57] is only when I go to the Application panel fails [20:10] 1098 root 20 0 81060 8440 6488 R 99.8 0.4 1:11.77 Xorg [20:10] xorg is at 100% cpu on start and just stays that way [20:36] xdotcommer: best way to debug such issues is to attach gdb to the process and do a stack backtrace - with suitable -dbgsym packages installed, and possibly the source too === rww is now known as FloodBot7 === FloodBot7 is now known as bestestbot === bestestbot is now known as rwd === rwd is now known as rww [20:57] TJ-: i will try [22:00] whats the best ubuntu 14.04 to use for an xbmc htpc? [22:22] Gnar: that will depend on the hardware specs of the htpc i guess, and whether you're looking to use it exclusively for xbmc .. there are a few special linux xbmc distros too that could be interesting [22:23] yeah the trouble is they're limited [22:23] i had openelec working but addon supported wasnt good [22:23] i have the new intel nuc [22:23] baytrail celeron [22:23] i want a lean linux that supports a standalone xbmc isntallation [22:24] Gnar: you could use lubuntu in that case and run the standalone xbmc session [22:26] whats the benefit to lubuntu over regular ubuntu? [22:26] Gnar: basically it has a smaller footprint, as it uses lightweight components for display manager, window manager etc [22:28] but runs all the applications the same? [22:28] if you're going to run xbmc most of the time you won't see it much, but it has all the tools of a regular ubuntu if yhou need them [22:29] Gnar: no it uses a different selection of apps by default, as do xubuntu, kubuntu etc. .. but you can install whatever you want on top of the defaults [22:30] but i mean it can install all the same shit that regular ubuntu can? [22:30] http://lubuntu.net/ for specifics, and you can always download the 14.04 daily liveCD image to test it [22:31] yes it does support the same ubuntu repos [22:33] Gnar: if you're going to go that way (or any other ubuntu flavor) and want to test with a live iso you'd need to have persistency, because xbmc would need to be installed and that can't be done on a regular live image