[00:29] <ibeardslee> wow just wow the debian init debate is getting badly trolled
[00:40] <ajmitch> hardly a surprise :)
[01:12] <mwhudson> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1194840.html seems above and beyond though
[01:13] <ajmitch> which reads like the same person trolling the list from multiple email addresses
[01:14] <mwhudson> that was waht other people were saying
[01:20] <olly_> yeah, they keep getting banned so move address
[01:21] <mwhudson> no idea who it really is presumably?
[01:22] <mwhudson> someone who is a bit mentally ill at a guess :/
[01:22] <olly_> i doubt there's a real world identity tied to them
[01:25] <olly_> i wonder if ubuntu will end up suffering these people later
[01:26] <ibeardslee> bound to have these sorts of things
[01:26] <ibeardslee> already have people getting upset with things like unity, or with mir etc
[01:26] <olly_> it doesn't seem sensible for ubuntu to stick with upstart forever if nobody else uses it
[01:27] <olly_> until unity, etc, users don't actually see init
[01:27] <ibeardslee> although I haven't seen the crying about change and decisions to involve threatening violence
[01:27] <ajmitch> it makes less sense to stick with upstart if debian eventually has services without sysvinit-compatible scripts that upstart can fall back on
[01:28] <ajmitch> ibeardslee: probably because of list moderation on ubuntu-devel :)
[01:50] <lifeless> olly_: depends how you measure usage.
[01:50] <lifeless> olly_: by end users, upstart is the single most deployed Linux init system out there.
[01:52] <mwhudson> all those RHEL6 servers!
[01:55] <olly_> lifeless: i wasn't measuring usage
[02:03] <lifeless> olly_: what were you measuring ?
[02:04] <olly_> i'm not sure I was measuring anything
[02:05] <lifeless> heh
[19:16] <ibeardslee> morning
[19:19] <olly_> morning
[19:38] <ajmitch> morning
[20:52] <chilts> morning