| === xnox_ is now known as xnox | ||
| === Pici is now known as Guest56659 | ||
| === JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose | ||
| === Logan__ is now known as Guest74751 | ||
| === Guest74751 is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === Logan_ is now known as Guest96987 | ||
| === Guest96987 is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === cfmcguire_ is now known as cfmcguire | ||
| === TheLordOfTime is now known as teward | ||
| === Logan_- is now known as Logan_ | ||
| === wgrant is now known as Guest34733 | ||
| === Guest34733 is now known as wgrant | ||
| === intgr_ is now known as intgr | ||
| === rbasak_ is now known as rbasak | ||
| === ikonia_ is now known as ikonia | ||
| === zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
| === back is now known as Guest87945 | ||
| === Guest87945 is now known as bakc | ||
| === back_ is now known as bakc | ||
| === back is now known as Guest66184 | ||
| === Guest66184 is now known as bakc | ||
| karmic_koala | Hi all (-: i recently filed a bugreport about an issue which was not based on a crash but a disfunction. so therefor i couldnt implement a crash report. it also seems not to concern a specific package but a Kernel implemented modul. so now the bugteam bot gently asked me to add a relevant package. should i answer the bot now explaining why theres no packages given by me, or just ignore that? or am i missing something ? thank you | 17:43 |
|---|---|---|
| karmic_koala | ps: the bot suggested to ask here (-: | 17:44 |
| bdmurray | for a kernel module the package would probably be linux | 18:19 |
| karmic_koala | bdmurray: thank you ! so should i name "Linux" as the Package then, or just leave it open ? | 18:21 |
| bdmurray | use linux as the package | 18:22 |
| karmic_koala | bdmurray: thank you very much ! best regards, me (-: | 18:23 |
| karmic_koala | bdmurray: souldnt i specify a kernel version or something ? the word "linux" is good ? | 18:25 |
| karmic_koala | alright i trial+errored it and "linux" is great. Thank all of yoizu for your work and enjoy your evening.cya | 18:29 |
| karmic_koala | dear people: can i remove iwConfig.txt and reupload a striped currentDmesg.txt from/to my bugreport as they are not relevant and i feel somehow not optimal about publishing that information to the publicc (mac adresses of wlan etc) ? | 19:21 |
| roadmr | karmic_koala: what's the bug # ? | 19:21 |
| karmic_koala | roadmr: nevermind, was my mistake. but thanks for your attention anyways ! (-: | 19:27 |
| roadmr | karmic_koala: ok | 19:27 |
| karmic_koala | jsalisbury (auto)asked me :"Please test the latest v3.13 kernel[0]." but at the bottom of his comment is a link to: .. mainline/v3.14-rc2-trusty/. So, should i test a 3.13 or this 3.14-rc2 now ? ps, im on 12.04.4 LTS | 19:46 |
| karmic_koala | all good, i trial and errored the frehsest one works. (-: | 20:05 |
| karmic_koala | Dear Humans, how do i reply to a comment on a bugreport ? how should i adress the author of the comment ? by :" @Comment#4" or "@Author" ? | 20:14 |
| szerated | When I visit the ubuntu new bugs on launchpad, many of them are very old. Do they just need to be closed? | 20:38 |
| Ampelbein | szerated: If you verified that they are fixed, yes. If they still are valid reports, you do the normal bug triage. | 20:40 |
| Ampelbein | szerated: Generally there's no reason to assume that bugs fix themself over time, some of the code in the archive hasn't changed much for years. | 20:41 |
| hggdh | szerated: you can also /join #ubuntu-bugs-announce for the newest bugs | 20:44 |
| szerated | hggdh: thanks thats what I need | 20:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!