=== xnox_ is now known as xnox
=== Pici is now known as Guest56659
=== JoseeAntonioR is now known as jose
=== Logan__ is now known as Guest74751
=== Guest74751 is now known as Logan_
=== Logan_ is now known as Guest96987
=== Guest96987 is now known as Logan_
=== cfmcguire_ is now known as cfmcguire
=== TheLordOfTime is now known as teward
=== Logan_- is now known as Logan_
=== wgrant is now known as Guest34733
=== Guest34733 is now known as wgrant
=== intgr_ is now known as intgr
=== rbasak_ is now known as rbasak
=== ikonia_ is now known as ikonia
=== zequence_ is now known as zequence
=== back is now known as Guest87945
=== Guest87945 is now known as bakc
=== back_ is now known as bakc
=== back is now known as Guest66184
=== Guest66184 is now known as bakc
[17:43] <karmic_koala> Hi all (-: i recently filed a bugreport about an issue which was not based on a crash but a disfunction. so therefor i couldnt implement a crash report. it also seems not to concern a specific package but a Kernel implemented modul. so now the bugteam bot gently asked me to add a relevant package. should i answer the bot now explaining why theres no packages given by me, or just ignore that? or am i missing something ? thank you
[17:44] <karmic_koala> ps: the bot suggested to ask here (-:
[18:19] <bdmurray> for a kernel module the package would probably be linux
[18:21] <karmic_koala> bdmurray: thank you ! so should i name "Linux" as the Package then, or just leave it open ?
[18:22] <bdmurray> use linux as the package
[18:23] <karmic_koala> bdmurray: thank you very much ! best regards, me (-:
[18:25] <karmic_koala> bdmurray: souldnt i specify a kernel version or something ? the word "linux" is good ?
[18:29] <karmic_koala> alright i trial+errored it and "linux" is great. Thank all of yoizu for your work and enjoy your evening.cya
[19:21] <karmic_koala> dear people: can i remove iwConfig.txt and reupload a striped currentDmesg.txt from/to my bugreport as they are not relevant and i feel somehow not optimal about publishing that information to the publicc (mac adresses of wlan etc) ?
[19:21] <roadmr> karmic_koala: what's the bug # ?
[19:27] <karmic_koala> roadmr: nevermind, was my mistake. but thanks for your attention anyways ! (-:
[19:27] <roadmr> karmic_koala: ok
[19:46] <karmic_koala> jsalisbury (auto)asked me :"Please test the latest v3.13 kernel[0]." but at the bottom of his comment is a link to: .. mainline/v3.14-rc2-trusty/. So, should i test a 3.13 or this 3.14-rc2 now ? ps, im on 12.04.4 LTS
[20:05] <karmic_koala> all good, i trial and errored the frehsest one works. (-:
[20:14] <karmic_koala> Dear Humans, how do i reply to a comment on a bugreport ? how should i adress the author of the comment ? by :" @Comment#4" or "@Author" ?
[20:38] <szerated> When I visit the ubuntu new bugs on launchpad, many of them are very old. Do they just need to be closed?
[20:40] <Ampelbein> szerated: If you verified that they are fixed, yes. If they still are valid reports, you do the normal bug triage.
[20:41] <Ampelbein> szerated: Generally there's no reason to assume that bugs fix themself over time, some of the code in the archive hasn't changed much for years.
[20:44] <hggdh> szerated: you can also /join #ubuntu-bugs-announce for the newest bugs
[20:44] <szerated> hggdh: thanks thats what I need