[00:16] Hi good people, can some one have a look into bug 964705 I thought it had been solved, but it seems solved everywhere but ubuntu [00:16] Launchpad bug 964705 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "System policy prevents modification of network settings for all users" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/964705 [00:26] that awkward moment when you reply to a mailing list posting and realise you are Wrong a few seconds afterwards. [00:27] albeit only partially [00:44] lfaraone: it is called life... we have all done it, do not beat your self up over it. === TheLordOfTime is now known as teward [01:15] hello, I submitted a bug in my package regarding the repo version but I have no received an update except from a bot turning it to "confirmed". [01:16] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uget/+bug/1278233 [01:16] Launchpad bug 1278233 in uget (Ubuntu) "Update uGet for 14.04 Trusty Tahr (needs libappindicator)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [01:17] the same bug was reported in October of last year for an older package but no one (who could fix it) commented on it then either. [01:17] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uget/+bug/1246697 [01:17] Launchpad bug 1246697 in uget (Ubuntu) "Uget tray icon not showing" [Undecided,Confirmed] [01:18] the same bug was already reported 2 years ago. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uget/+bug/925137 [01:18] Launchpad bug 925137 in uget (Ubuntu) "uGet not built with AppIndicator support" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [01:18] so can I please get someone to help me fix the package? [01:19] You should contact the package maintainer [01:20] I did. He is the Debian guy for the package but he hasn't responded about it either [01:20] all I need is to make it build with libappindicator...that's it [01:22] Well it would be best to get the change into Debian and then sync with that, if he is maintainer for both, then he's the guy [01:22] have you considered filing a bug on this in Debian? [01:22] because that's probably the best way to get their attention [01:22] but Debian doesn't use libappindicator, that is an Ubuntu package unless I'm mistaken [01:23] MichaelTunnell: Ahhh, I see what you mean, so there needs to be a diff between Debian and Ubuntu [01:23] yes, and that is the only diff [01:23] which release were you expecting to get this in [01:23] because i think you might have a problem getting this SRU'd, and this would only get into trusty [01:23] (this close to feature freeze, though... I dunno) [01:23] MichaelTunnell: Are you able to produce the diff/patch so the maintainer can merge it? [01:23] 14.04 which it is already in the repo for 14.04 with our latest release...just that one feature is not [01:24] I'd think if the maintainer has been lax, an FFE wouldn't be rejected [01:24] teward: I dont mind getting backports later as long as I can get it into trusty [01:24] considering uget is in universe i don't think it *has* a maintainer [01:24] or, at least not a maintainer in Ubuntu [01:24] yea the maintainer is just the guy from debian [01:24] (this is the case with a lot of packages) [01:24] and he just pulls the debian version in [01:25] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uget [01:25] actually Ubuntu does that on their own [01:25] :P [01:25] autosyncs ;P [01:25] ahh [01:26] You'd need to grab a MOTU and offer them a patch, probably a bzr branch they can easily merge [01:27] MOTU? [01:27] what does that mean [01:27] Masters of the Univerise [01:27] s/Univerise/Universe/ [01:27] ok that makes even less sense [01:27] lol [01:27] oh ok [01:27] actually you'd need a Sponsor [01:27] not necessarily a MOTU [01:27] The maintainers of the "Universe" pocket [01:27] TJ-: perhaps you need to read up on sponsoring [01:28] !sponsoring [01:28] You can find out about the package sponsorship process here http://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess - For !UDS sponsorship see http://uds.ubuntu.com/participate/sponsorship/ [01:28] doesn't *require* a MOTU [01:28] but they will critique your stuff [01:28] not sure how to make a patch [01:29] though we have a ppa with the correct stuff [01:29] if that doesnt help I can contact the main developer and see if he will do it...I'm pretty much the designer with only slight programming...so this is past my skill level [01:30] Where's your PPA? [01:30] https://launchpad.net/~plushuang-tw [01:30] only thing in there is uget [01:30] you have two versions :p [01:31] which one is based off the debian version [01:31] or off the ubuntu version [01:31] if neither are based off those then the patch has to be made by hand [01:31] we made the ppa version before both [01:31] so guess neither [01:32] except for an old version but not recents [01:32] what actually needs to be done to make this work [01:32] i may be able to try and handwrite a debdiff for you assuming you have a bug for this [01:33] libappindicator needs to be included in the Ubuntu package...thats the only thing wrong with the ubuntu version [01:33] that's vague [01:33] is it a build dep or a runtime dep or both :P [01:33] MichaelTunnell: I don't see any diff between your latest package and the one in Ubuntu [01:33] next question is whether the two bugs on this are dupes of them [01:33] (brb) [01:34] one is an issue from an old version [01:34] the 2012 bug is old [01:34] my bug is for 1.10.4 and the other is for 1.10.3 [01:34] OK, my mistake, I ran against the wrong directory! [01:34] though the difference between those two have nothing to do with libappindicator [01:35] :) [01:35] MichaelTunnell: so all you want to add is debian/control Build-Depends "libappindicator3-dev," [01:35] that should be all that is needed but to be honest I am not totally sure as I'm just the lowly designer :) [01:36] lets find out then [01:38] thanks [01:38] wait are you saying you are doing that or do Ineed to contact the dev? [01:40] I'm doing it [01:44] MichaelTunnell: Do you have a clean Unity-based system you can test the binary on - one that hasn't had the package installed previously ? I don't use Gnome here so not sure if I can test it correctly [01:46] I can load up a liveusb sure [01:47] Hmm, it seems ok. On KDE I have a green "G" icon [01:47] I havent tried it in kde on ubuntu [01:47] I might have a clean desktop VM here, let me check [01:47] ok [02:13] where do I get the package to test it? [02:14] MichaelTunnell: http://iam.tj/projects/misc/uget-trusty-appindicator.png [02:14] Is that correct? [02:15] TJ-: did you build it locally on your system (pbuilder or sbuild or something?) [02:16] TJ-: yep that looks good [02:16] close the app and tell it to minimize to tray [02:17] then try "show main window" from tray [02:17] and that would mean it works fine [02:20] MichaelTunnell: Yes, that works [02:20] teward: Yes [02:25] then awesome [02:25] MichaelTunnell: OK, The bug is now linked to my bzr branch containing the fix, so you just to get it sponsored and merged [02:25] i have no idea how to do that [02:25] MichaelTunnell: If you refresh the bug-page you'll see it under "Related branches" [02:26] how do I get it sponsored? [02:27] MichaelTunnell: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess [02:28] thanks [02:32] MichaelTunnell: I've proposed it for merge, you can watch its progress here: https://code.launchpad.net/~tj/ubuntu/trusty/uget/lp1278233/+merge/206571 [02:34] sweet thanks [02:34] do I still need to get it sponsored? [02:35] It might help to get some attention, but the merge request should be seen in the queue, it just depends if anyone is interested/free enough [02:37] I know someone from Canonical who might be wiling to throw some eyes at it (he isn't a developer which is why I didn't ask for help from him about this issue) [02:38] thank you very much for your assistance [02:39] MichaelTunnell: You're welcome, fortunately for you it was a trivial patch :) [02:40] :) indeed...we typically don't have large bugs so if we do have bugs it is usually something like this :) === Hurtz_ is now known as Hurtz === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [17:20] bdmurray: ping. [17:25] hi.. any bug masters about? === emma_ is now known as emma