/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/02/16/#ubuntu-app-devel.txt

popeye.g. the ios app uploaded earlier, there was an alert that "this is not a valid click package" so i didnt bother doing any further checks, just bounced it00:00
aquariuspopey, but... what tests are done that click-reviewer-tools doesn't do? the output I got when my first upload failed certainly seemed to be pretty automated -- it was json, fergawdsake :)00:00
popeyyeah, i copy/pasted that into the reply ☻00:00
popeyi could have edited out the obvious json bits ㋛00:01
aquariusha!00:01
aquariusthe impression I had was that you (didn't know it was you btw!) basically downloaded the package, ran click-reviewers-tools, pasted the output errors into an email, and clicked "failed tests". Which is cool, but surely (and I understand, believe me, what it's like that side of the fence) not that hard to do automatically...? :)00:02
aquariuslots to do and not many people to do it, though, of course.00:02
popeyI think so too ☻00:02
popeyask beuno ☻00:02
popeydoes it not tell you who did the review? didnt know that?00:03
aquariusI would do, but I had enough of those sorts of conversations with beuno before I left ;) I'm sure there's plenty of stuff to do and "make it all done by a script" is on the list, it's just that "I uploaded my app and it was in the store fifteen seconds later" would be such a massive PR win :)00:03
aquariuspopey, I don't think it does, 'cos I'd have noticed if it'd said it was you... but maybe I missed it00:04
popeyi think you see in the web ui00:04
popeyi see holbach did mine, but maybe thats my view00:04
aquariustoday again I talked myself out of making a noddy "USC" which lets you browse and install click packages on the desktop ;)00:06
popeysomeone else did00:07
popeywell, browse00:07
popeyhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/6940344/00:08
popeysomeone == Robert00:08
popeyrun that, it spawns in your browser00:08
aquariuswhat a good lad.00:09
ybonah, one more bad news because Qt cast to string the value send to the section.delegate: I cannot make that when clicking the date itself it opens the Day view00:10
aquariusthat's very cool indeed. Well done Schroll.00:10
ybon(or I can parsing the string, but... ;) )00:10
aquariusybon, why not?00:10
ybonbecause I've a string, not a date00:10
aquariusybon, yeah, make the string value be, say, "dateheader:dayviewid" or something :)00:10
aquariusthis is quite annoying, though00:11
aquariusyou're supposed to be able to pass JS objects around; that's what makes JS good.00:11
ybonah, but, maybe now I understand why it's done like this: because the value is used to group ListItem together00:11
ybonand they don't want to compare complex object00:12
ybon(maybe)00:12
ybonand given that the section itself is shared between more than one ListItem, what should be the value of the Date sent?00:12
aquariusthat;s why you should be able to set section.property to be a function, so you can handle the complexity yourself if you want :)00:13
aquariusman, this click browser is flamin' excellent.00:13
ybonyep00:13
* popey goes to bed, early start... 00:13
popeythanks for the contributions ybon  - ping me a mail if there's anything you want me to test, or if there's someone i can poke to help00:14
ybonpopey: thanks :)00:14
popeyor leave me a pm, I'm always connected00:14
ybonand good night! :)00:14
popeynn00:14
ybon(and here is the branch for the AgendaView)00:16
ybon(https://code.launchpad.net/~yohanboniface/ubuntu-calendar-app/AgendaView I meant :) )00:16
ghostmars919Hello16:14
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
DeTorrhello19:09
DeTorrworld19:09
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!