[00:00] e.g. the ios app uploaded earlier, there was an alert that "this is not a valid click package" so i didnt bother doing any further checks, just bounced it [00:00] popey, but... what tests are done that click-reviewer-tools doesn't do? the output I got when my first upload failed certainly seemed to be pretty automated -- it was json, fergawdsake :) [00:00] yeah, i copy/pasted that into the reply ☻ [00:01] i could have edited out the obvious json bits ㋛ [00:01] ha! [00:02] the impression I had was that you (didn't know it was you btw!) basically downloaded the package, ran click-reviewers-tools, pasted the output errors into an email, and clicked "failed tests". Which is cool, but surely (and I understand, believe me, what it's like that side of the fence) not that hard to do automatically...? :) [00:02] lots to do and not many people to do it, though, of course. [00:02] I think so too ☻ [00:02] ask beuno ☻ [00:03] does it not tell you who did the review? didnt know that? [00:03] I would do, but I had enough of those sorts of conversations with beuno before I left ;) I'm sure there's plenty of stuff to do and "make it all done by a script" is on the list, it's just that "I uploaded my app and it was in the store fifteen seconds later" would be such a massive PR win :) [00:04] popey, I don't think it does, 'cos I'd have noticed if it'd said it was you... but maybe I missed it [00:04] i think you see in the web ui [00:04] i see holbach did mine, but maybe thats my view [00:06] today again I talked myself out of making a noddy "USC" which lets you browse and install click packages on the desktop ;) [00:07] someone else did [00:07] well, browse [00:08] http://paste.ubuntu.com/6940344/ [00:08] someone == Robert [00:08] run that, it spawns in your browser [00:09] what a good lad. [00:10] ah, one more bad news because Qt cast to string the value send to the section.delegate: I cannot make that when clicking the date itself it opens the Day view [00:10] that's very cool indeed. Well done Schroll. [00:10] (or I can parsing the string, but... ;) ) [00:10] ybon, why not? [00:10] because I've a string, not a date [00:10] ybon, yeah, make the string value be, say, "dateheader:dayviewid" or something :) [00:11] this is quite annoying, though [00:11] you're supposed to be able to pass JS objects around; that's what makes JS good. [00:11] ah, but, maybe now I understand why it's done like this: because the value is used to group ListItem together [00:12] and they don't want to compare complex object [00:12] (maybe) [00:12] and given that the section itself is shared between more than one ListItem, what should be the value of the Date sent? [00:13] that;s why you should be able to set section.property to be a function, so you can handle the complexity yourself if you want :) [00:13] man, this click browser is flamin' excellent. [00:13] yep [00:13] * popey goes to bed, early start... [00:14] thanks for the contributions ybon - ping me a mail if there's anything you want me to test, or if there's someone i can poke to help [00:14] popey: thanks :) [00:14] or leave me a pm, I'm always connected [00:14] and good night! :) [00:14] nn [00:16] (and here is the branch for the AgendaView) [00:16] (https://code.launchpad.net/~yohanboniface/ubuntu-calendar-app/AgendaView I meant :) ) [16:14] Hello === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [19:09] hello [19:09] world === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha