[00:00] <popey> e.g. the ios app uploaded earlier, there was an alert that "this is not a valid click package" so i didnt bother doing any further checks, just bounced it
[00:00] <aquarius> popey, but... what tests are done that click-reviewer-tools doesn't do? the output I got when my first upload failed certainly seemed to be pretty automated -- it was json, fergawdsake :)
[00:00] <popey> yeah, i copy/pasted that into the reply ☻
[00:01] <popey> i could have edited out the obvious json bits ㋛
[00:01] <aquarius> ha!
[00:02] <aquarius> the impression I had was that you (didn't know it was you btw!) basically downloaded the package, ran click-reviewers-tools, pasted the output errors into an email, and clicked "failed tests". Which is cool, but surely (and I understand, believe me, what it's like that side of the fence) not that hard to do automatically...? :)
[00:02] <aquarius> lots to do and not many people to do it, though, of course.
[00:02] <popey> I think so too ☻
[00:02] <popey> ask beuno ☻
[00:03] <popey> does it not tell you who did the review? didnt know that?
[00:03] <aquarius> I would do, but I had enough of those sorts of conversations with beuno before I left ;) I'm sure there's plenty of stuff to do and "make it all done by a script" is on the list, it's just that "I uploaded my app and it was in the store fifteen seconds later" would be such a massive PR win :)
[00:04] <aquarius> popey, I don't think it does, 'cos I'd have noticed if it'd said it was you... but maybe I missed it
[00:04] <popey> i think you see in the web ui
[00:04] <popey> i see holbach did mine, but maybe thats my view
[00:06] <aquarius> today again I talked myself out of making a noddy "USC" which lets you browse and install click packages on the desktop ;)
[00:07] <popey> someone else did
[00:07] <popey> well, browse
[00:08] <popey> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6940344/
[00:08] <popey> someone == Robert
[00:08] <popey> run that, it spawns in your browser
[00:09] <aquarius> what a good lad.
[00:10] <ybon> ah, one more bad news because Qt cast to string the value send to the section.delegate: I cannot make that when clicking the date itself it opens the Day view
[00:10] <aquarius> that's very cool indeed. Well done Schroll.
[00:10] <ybon> (or I can parsing the string, but... ;) )
[00:10] <aquarius> ybon, why not?
[00:10] <ybon> because I've a string, not a date
[00:10] <aquarius> ybon, yeah, make the string value be, say, "dateheader:dayviewid" or something :)
[00:11] <aquarius> this is quite annoying, though
[00:11] <aquarius> you're supposed to be able to pass JS objects around; that's what makes JS good.
[00:11] <ybon> ah, but, maybe now I understand why it's done like this: because the value is used to group ListItem together
[00:12] <ybon> and they don't want to compare complex object
[00:12] <ybon> (maybe)
[00:12] <ybon> and given that the section itself is shared between more than one ListItem, what should be the value of the Date sent?
[00:13] <aquarius> that;s why you should be able to set section.property to be a function, so you can handle the complexity yourself if you want :)
[00:13] <aquarius> man, this click browser is flamin' excellent.
[00:13] <ybon> yep
[00:13]  * popey goes to bed, early start... 
[00:14] <popey> thanks for the contributions ybon  - ping me a mail if there's anything you want me to test, or if there's someone i can poke to help
[00:14] <ybon> popey: thanks :)
[00:14] <popey> or leave me a pm, I'm always connected
[00:14] <ybon> and good night! :)
[00:14] <popey> nn
[00:16] <ybon> (and here is the branch for the AgendaView)
[00:16] <ybon> (https://code.launchpad.net/~yohanboniface/ubuntu-calendar-app/AgendaView I meant :) )
[16:14] <ghostmars919> Hello
[19:09] <DeTorr> hello
[19:09] <DeTorr> world