[00:31] <OvenWerks> ubuntustudio-menu builds clean even with out switching to link. Guess I already fixed that :)
[00:31] <OvenWerks> zequence: did you ever get release rights for our packages?
[01:14] <zequence> OvenWerks: Not yet.
[01:57] <OvenWerks> ok, i'll ask micah... maybe I'll look to see if I should do anything else first.
[02:47] <holstein> is this something we need? http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2014/02/sound-switcher-app-ubuntu
[02:48] <holstein> i dont even know if it'll work in XFCE, or if we need that with pulse, but its slick, and looks like what i suggest folks use pavucontrol for
[02:57] <OvenWerks> holstein: so far as I know unity uses a different kind of applet for its panel.
[02:57] <holstein> :/
[02:58] <OvenWerks> Also, this applet is not available except through ppa.
[02:58] <holstein> who knows if it would ever get in the repos anyways
[02:58] <OvenWerks> It would actually not be that hard to make an applet in python to do the same thing
[02:59] <OvenWerks> My only problem is I would want to do so much more with it :)
[03:00] <OvenWerks> The KDE sound applet on first glance, looks nicer than pavucontrol, but I found I ended up installing pavucontrol anyway.
[03:01] <OvenWerks> It would not be impossible to make an app more like qjackctl with an in/output connection graph
[03:02] <holstein> well, we might not need one.
[03:02] <holstein> i like pavucontrol
[03:02] <holstein> i think mostly its the folks who mis-understand what studio is for.. 
[03:02] <OvenWerks> :)
[03:03] <OvenWerks> or missunderstand what PA is for.
[03:04] <holstein> yup
[09:13] <zequence> holstein: OvenWerks: Unity uses appindicator, which should be supported on most DEs these days
[09:14] <zequence> OvenWerks: holstein: ubuntustudio-controls has that as one of its features, switching audio devices on the fly
[09:15] <zequence> (the one I need to finish before thursday, or so - all though we should be able to get an exception)
[10:28] <cub> Hi zequence, about the merge to add espeak and speech/dispatcher. I thought it would be merged when you approved_
[10:31] <cub> hmm wrong keyboard layout, there was supposed to be a  ? above. :)
[11:39] <zequence> cub: hmm, never done that before. Seems I need to do it manually. Will try it now :)
[11:49] <zequence> cub: I was unable to merge, so had to get your changes and commit them in one commit.
[11:50] <zequence> ..since there were changes to the seeds after your changes
[11:50] <zequence> But, the changes are in now, anyway
[11:51] <zequence> cub: Ah, LP understood, so I guess it was done proprely
[12:19] <cub> cool
[12:19] <cub> you think it will be included in the next build then?
[12:19] <cub> so I could start testing the installation
[12:20] <zequence> cub: Should be, yes
[13:32] <cub> I hope to be able to attend the community council meeting on Thursday but need to verify that my GF is not working that evening
[13:44] <OvenWerks> Sorry, I should have done the merge when I was working on it.
[13:45] <OvenWerks> I have spent so little time on Studio this cycle.
[13:58] <cub> it's been hard for everyone to find the time I think
[13:58] <cub> which is unfortunate since it's the LTS but what can you do