[10:31] <psivaa> cjwatson: infinity: Don't see precise images since .3 release. Not that i need them but in case anyone looking at the dashboard was curious
[10:34] <cjwatson> psivaa: Oh, I forgot to turn the cron jobs back on.  Done now
[10:35] <psivaa> cjwatson: ack, thanks :)
[11:38] <mlankhorst> can I copy libxcb 1.10 back to precise? :P
[11:40] <mlankhorst> the diff is awful, but mesa 10 / xorg-server 1.15 need it.
[11:57] <Riddell> "Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Precise 12.04.4]" what's that about?
[11:58] <Laney> Looks like the milestone didn't get marked as released, so new builds are going there
[11:58] <xnox> Riddell: precise-daily started to be built, but the iso tracker didn't archive the milestone probably.
[11:58]  * Laney WINS
[11:58] <xnox> cjwatson: stgraber: can you mark 12.04.4 as released on the tracker?
[11:58] <Laney> no need to ping them, anyone on the team can do it
[11:59] <xnox> Laney: which team is that? ubuntu-release?
[11:59] <Laney> yeah
[11:59] <Laney> done
[11:59] <Laney> Not quite sure how to wind back the kubuntu publication though
[12:06] <jamespage> is there a reason why http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/releases/12.04.4/release/ does not have -server images?
[12:07] <Laney> jamespage: because they're on http://releases.ubuntu.com/12.04.4/
[12:07] <jamespage> Laney, sorry - I knew I was being stupid
[12:07] <Laney> not stupid, it's not entirely obvious
[12:08] <jamespage> Laney, next question - if I want an original 12.04.0 iso where can I find that?  I just got asked and could not find it
[12:08] <Laney> jamespage: http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/precise/
[12:09] <Laney> Dunno why .3 isn't there, mind
[12:09] <jamespage> Laney, ta
[12:09] <Laney> c_jwatson tried to push it there the other day, but apparently it didn't work
[16:28] <Laney> bah
[16:28] <Laney> edubuntu got touch stuff again
[16:28] <stgraber> what a surprise...
[16:29] <Laney> indeed
[16:32] <seb128> Laney, when was the iso rolling? maybe the u-c-c versioned recommends issue we discussed this morning
[16:32] <Laney> it might be, i'm checking
[16:32] <Laney> doesn't have system-settings, so probably not
[16:40] <stgraber> Laney: feel free to just respin if you want to be sure. If you want a quick rebuild, respin only amd64, it's considerably faster than i386 to build (as it doesn't need to build 3 livefs images :))
[16:48] <Laney> stgraber: yeah, will do, as I don't see the problem when running germinate manually
[17:02] <jibel> cyphermox_, does one of the test changes network-configuration?
[17:02] <jibel> *network configuration
[17:03] <cyphermox_> jibel: it's possible yes. good point
[17:03] <cyphermox_> I only just added tests, so it wasn't noticed before
[17:03] <cyphermox_> I'll make it "breaks-testbed"
[17:04] <cyphermox_> or whatever the tag for this might be
[20:12] <Riddell> ahem
[22:35] <seb128> slangasek, hey, do you plan to ask for an equivalent of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1208989 for trusty?
[22:35] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1208989 in Ubuntu "[FFe] standing freeze exception for Ubuntu Touch-specific packages" [Undecided,Confirmed]