| === mwhudson is now known as zz_mwhudson | ||
| === semiosis_ is now known as semiosis | ||
| === semiosis_ is now known as semiosis | ||
| inahandizha | http://VisitsToMoney.com/index.php?refId=386970 | 06:05 |
|---|---|---|
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ | ||
| Doctor_N_ | How do I force launchpad to delete binaries from a ppa? | 07:08 |
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| wgrant | Doctor_N_: Delete the source and the binaries will go with it. | 07:09 |
| Doctor_N_ | wgrant: that's the problem, it didn't | 07:13 |
| Doctor_N_ | Now I'm trying to copy the same source package into the ppa again, and it refuses to sync saying that the binaries are already there | 07:14 |
| wgrant | Doctor_N_: You may need to do it a second time if you initially deleted the source before the builds had finished publishing. | 07:14 |
| wgrant | Doctor_N_: Ah, you can't do that. | 07:14 |
| wgrant | You can remove them from the archive on disk, but their existence is remembered forever | 07:14 |
| Doctor_N_ | ok | 07:14 |
| Doctor_N_ | that seems really obnoxious and shitty | 07:14 |
| wgrant | If I have a filename 'foo_1.0_amd64.deb' in a PPA, that PPA will never permit a file with different contents but the same name. | 07:14 |
| wgrant | Because that would be mighty confusing to people and apt. | 07:15 |
| wgrant | If it's a different version it needs to have a different version string. | 07:15 |
| Doctor_N_ | I'm just gonna copy the packages into a new ppa, delete the original and recreate it. | 07:17 |
| Doctor_N_ | then copy them back. | 07:17 |
| wgrant | Or you could just change the version number. | 07:17 |
| wgrant | Given that the package is a different version. | 07:17 |
| Doctor_N_ | too much effort | 07:17 |
| wgrant | It's easier to wait out a PPA deletion than dch -i and dput? | 07:18 |
| === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === kostja_o1ipov is now known as kostja_osipov | ||
| czajkowski | cjwatson: is this normal to see on an autoremove http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6964585/ | 09:50 |
| === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ | ||
| cjwatson | czajkowski: currently yes | 10:34 |
| cjwatson | (it's a known bug but will take me a while to sort out, and generally isn't a big deal) | 10:35 |
| czajkowski | cjwatson: grand job | 10:45 |
| czajkowski | thanks Colin | 10:45 |
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| Doctor_N_ | wgrant: yes, as it turns out | 11:07 |
| Doctor_N_ | LOVE | 12:22 |
| === sandyd-away is now known as sandyd | ||
| === rmk` is now known as rmk | ||
| === BradCrittenden is now known as bac | ||
| === sandyd is now known as sandyd-away | ||
| Doctor_Nick | apw: the wrong kernel version is in 3.14rc3 on the kernel ppa, can you please fix this? | 15:13 |
| Doctor_Nick | http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.14-rc3-trusty/ | 15:13 |
| sgo11 | hi, not sure if I can ask the question here. I am using ubuntu. if I found more than one PPA which has the package that I want to install in launchpad, which one should I choose? Are there something in launchpad like the "Star" in github? thanks. | 15:17 |
| Doctor_Nick | uhm | 15:18 |
| Doctor_Nick | compare the version numbers...? | 15:18 |
| Doctor_Nick | sgo11: I'm not sure what you're asking. If the versions are the same and they're both published for the ubuntu version you use, there shouldn't be a difference | 15:23 |
| Doctor_Nick | unless one of them did something weird with the debian files | 15:23 |
| apw | Doctor_Nick, hmmm will have a look, though #ubuntu-kernel makes more sense for this | 15:24 |
| Doctor_Nick | ohhh | 15:25 |
| Doctor_Nick | I was wondering what the irc channel was | 15:25 |
| sgo11 | Doctor_N_, thanks for your reply. just saw your message. they are the same version and ubuntu version. I don't know the detail of building a ubuntu/debian package. will they be the same? if they are the same, md5sum should give the same results, I will check md5sum for them. | 15:25 |
| Doctor_Nick | they should be, but even if they're not, i doubt that there's any difference | 15:26 |
| Doctor_Nick | md5 sums, I mean | 15:26 |
| sgo11 | Doctor_Nick, ok. thanks. I was just wondering if one will be better/more stable than another by any chances. | 15:27 |
| Doctor_Nick | post the links for them | 15:27 |
| sgo11 | Doctor_N_, posted here? https://launchpad.net/~rwky/+archive/redis https://launchpad.net/~chris-lea/+archive/redis-server | 15:29 |
| cjwatson | There is no guarantee that two identically-versioned packages in different archives will be the same. | 15:32 |
| cjwatson | You have to make your own judgement about quality based on whether you recognise the people involved, what the changelogs say, etc. | 15:33 |
| cjwatson | It's of course possible that one will be a copy of the other, in which case (ideally) the publication history should indicate that, or you can indeed look at checksums. | 15:33 |
| sgo11 | cjwatson, ok. thanks. I wish lauchpad can have a "Star" like the one in github. so I can simply use the most starred one. :) | 15:34 |
| sgo11 | I gotta go. Thank both of you very much. bye. | 15:46 |
| dobey | eh, "most starred" is not necessarily a good indicator either | 15:47 |
| sgo11 | dobey, thanks for your opinion. but I like "most starred". it's easier for me to choose between projects. | 15:48 |
| sgo11 | if one has one star, another one has thousands of stars. I will choose the latter one. :) | 15:49 |
| dobey | that's unofrtunate. but whatever. | 15:51 |
| Doctor_Nick | what if they only starred it to lure others | 15:51 |
| Doctor_Nick | what then sgo11 | 15:51 |
| Doctor_Nick | WHAT THEN | 15:51 |
| sgo11 | Doctor_Nick, :) "star" functionality is better than nothing. thanks for your help. I gotta sleep. thanks and bye. ^_^ | 15:53 |
| Doctor_Nick | welp | 15:53 |
| Doctor_Nick | is there a cli tool to spit out the most recent version from a debian changes log? | 16:04 |
| cjwatson | "dpkg-parsechangelog -n1" will do it although it outputs in .changes format rather than changelog format | 16:07 |
| Doctor_Nick | that's fine | 16:09 |
| Doctor_Nick | i just need the version number | 16:09 |
| cjwatson | "dpkg-parsechangelog -SVersion" then | 16:10 |
| cjwatson | well, in trusty, otherwise you have to pick it out using awk or whatever | 16:11 |
| Doctor_Nick | aww | 16:12 |
| === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === sandyd-away is now known as ClumsyFairyQueen | ||
| === zz_mwhudson is now known as mwhudson | ||
| === mwhudson is now known as zz_mwhudson | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === zz_mwhudson is now known as mwhudson | ||
| shnatsel | Hello! | 20:57 |
| shnatsel | I get "503: No server is available to handle this request." from LP's Loggerhead quite often today. | 20:57 |
| shnatsel | It's on a 503 streak again right now. Is that a known issue / planned downtime / whatever? | 20:58 |
| shnatsel | e.g. this page shows 503: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~elementary-os/granite/deb-packaging/revision/59 | 20:59 |
| shnatsel | oh, it's just fixed itself again :) | 20:59 |
| === cprov_ is now known as cprov | ||
| === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov | ||
| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === cmars` is now known as cmars | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!