=== mwhudson is now known as zz_mwhudson === semiosis_ is now known as semiosis === semiosis_ is now known as semiosis [06:05] http://VisitsToMoney.com/index.php?refId=386970 === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ [07:08] How do I force launchpad to delete binaries from a ppa? === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov [07:09] Doctor_N_: Delete the source and the binaries will go with it. [07:13] wgrant: that's the problem, it didn't [07:14] Now I'm trying to copy the same source package into the ppa again, and it refuses to sync saying that the binaries are already there [07:14] Doctor_N_: You may need to do it a second time if you initially deleted the source before the builds had finished publishing. [07:14] Doctor_N_: Ah, you can't do that. [07:14] You can remove them from the archive on disk, but their existence is remembered forever [07:14] ok [07:14] that seems really obnoxious and shitty [07:14] If I have a filename 'foo_1.0_amd64.deb' in a PPA, that PPA will never permit a file with different contents but the same name. [07:15] Because that would be mighty confusing to people and apt. [07:15] If it's a different version it needs to have a different version string. [07:17] I'm just gonna copy the packages into a new ppa, delete the original and recreate it. [07:17] then copy them back. [07:17] Or you could just change the version number. [07:17] Given that the package is a different version. [07:17] too much effort [07:18] It's easier to wait out a PPA deletion than dch -i and dput? === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov === kostja_o1ipov is now known as kostja_osipov [09:50] cjwatson: is this normal to see on an autoremove http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/6964585/ === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ [10:34] czajkowski: currently yes [10:35] (it's a known bug but will take me a while to sort out, and generally isn't a big deal) [10:45] cjwatson: grand job [10:45] thanks Colin === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov [11:07] wgrant: yes, as it turns out [12:22] LOVE === sandyd-away is now known as sandyd === rmk` is now known as rmk === BradCrittenden is now known as bac === sandyd is now known as sandyd-away [15:13] apw: the wrong kernel version is in 3.14rc3 on the kernel ppa, can you please fix this? [15:13] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.14-rc3-trusty/ [15:17] hi, not sure if I can ask the question here. I am using ubuntu. if I found more than one PPA which has the package that I want to install in launchpad, which one should I choose? Are there something in launchpad like the "Star" in github? thanks. [15:18] uhm [15:18] compare the version numbers...? [15:23] sgo11: I'm not sure what you're asking. If the versions are the same and they're both published for the ubuntu version you use, there shouldn't be a difference [15:23] unless one of them did something weird with the debian files [15:24] Doctor_Nick, hmmm will have a look, though #ubuntu-kernel makes more sense for this [15:25] ohhh [15:25] I was wondering what the irc channel was [15:25] Doctor_N_, thanks for your reply. just saw your message. they are the same version and ubuntu version. I don't know the detail of building a ubuntu/debian package. will they be the same? if they are the same, md5sum should give the same results, I will check md5sum for them. [15:26] they should be, but even if they're not, i doubt that there's any difference [15:26] md5 sums, I mean [15:27] Doctor_Nick, ok. thanks. I was just wondering if one will be better/more stable than another by any chances. [15:27] post the links for them [15:29] Doctor_N_, posted here? https://launchpad.net/~rwky/+archive/redis https://launchpad.net/~chris-lea/+archive/redis-server [15:32] There is no guarantee that two identically-versioned packages in different archives will be the same. [15:33] You have to make your own judgement about quality based on whether you recognise the people involved, what the changelogs say, etc. [15:33] It's of course possible that one will be a copy of the other, in which case (ideally) the publication history should indicate that, or you can indeed look at checksums. [15:34] cjwatson, ok. thanks. I wish lauchpad can have a "Star" like the one in github. so I can simply use the most starred one. :) [15:46] I gotta go. Thank both of you very much. bye. [15:47] eh, "most starred" is not necessarily a good indicator either [15:48] dobey, thanks for your opinion. but I like "most starred". it's easier for me to choose between projects. [15:49] if one has one star, another one has thousands of stars. I will choose the latter one. :) [15:51] that's unofrtunate. but whatever. [15:51] what if they only starred it to lure others [15:51] what then sgo11 [15:51] WHAT THEN [15:53] Doctor_Nick, :) "star" functionality is better than nothing. thanks for your help. I gotta sleep. thanks and bye. ^_^ [15:53] welp [16:04] is there a cli tool to spit out the most recent version from a debian changes log? [16:07] "dpkg-parsechangelog -n1" will do it although it outputs in .changes format rather than changelog format [16:09] that's fine [16:09] i just need the version number [16:10] "dpkg-parsechangelog -SVersion" then [16:11] well, in trusty, otherwise you have to pick it out using awk or whatever [16:12] aww === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ === yofel_ is now known as yofel === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov === sandyd-away is now known as ClumsyFairyQueen === zz_mwhudson is now known as mwhudson === mwhudson is now known as zz_mwhudson === NikitaKonovalov is now known as NikitaKonovalov_ === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov === zz_mwhudson is now known as mwhudson [20:57] Hello! [20:57] I get "503: No server is available to handle this request." from LP's Loggerhead quite often today. [20:58] It's on a 503 streak again right now. Is that a known issue / planned downtime / whatever? [20:59] e.g. this page shows 503: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~elementary-os/granite/deb-packaging/revision/59 [20:59] oh, it's just fixed itself again :) === cprov_ is now known as cprov === NikitaKonovalov_ is now known as NikitaKonovalov === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber === yofel_ is now known as yofel === cmars` is now known as cmars