[00:00] <knome> any specific reason the xubuntu installer has a debian wallpaper on today's daily? :)
[07:42] <elfy> Riddell: hi - I've no idea who's down to deal with flavours and B1 this week - but I've not seen anything in m/l yet
[08:34] <Riddell> elfy: stgraber's name is down https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseTaskSignup
[08:42] <elfy> Riddell: aha - useful wiki page to know exists :) thanks
[15:12] <stgraber> elfy: sorry, sort of forgot about it, mail sent now...
[15:14] <knome> stgraber, i've updated the slideshow branch, so whenever you are ready.. :)
[15:15] <stgraber> knome: ok, will do that in a minute
[15:15] <knome> thanks!
[15:16] <knome> (we didn't update the changelog, but i will do that for the final release; we need to update the slideshow at least once more anyway
[15:16] <knome> you can add a generic item if you wish
[15:17] <stgraber> yeah, already did
[15:17] <knome> thanks again
[15:17] <stgraber> just waiting for a LP translation export and I'll upload it.
[15:18] <knome> cool
[15:25] <stgraber> knome: uploaded
[15:26]  * knome bows
[15:26] <stgraber> Laney: where's your block generator script again?
[15:27] <Laney> stgraber: lp:~laney/ubuntu-archive-tools/generate-freeze-block
[15:27] <Laney> please to review the MP
[15:28] <stgraber> Laney: oh, I must have missed the MP, will get it in today
[15:30] <xnox> Laney: stgraber: we are freezing the archive tomorrow, not today, right?!
[15:32] <Laney> We have been doing Tuesday, not sure if something different is happening for betas
[15:32] <knome> i thought it was agreed that tue works for betas as well
[15:34] <stgraber> wiki says
[15:34] <stgraber> Beta 1 Freeze (for opt-in flavors; Mon/Tue)
[15:35] <knome> but afair, that hasn't been updated after the ML discussion
[15:35] <stgraber> ah, could be, let me change that to Tuesday then
[15:35] <stgraber> ok, done
[15:36] <knome> good, much better that it has a single day anyway
[15:36] <Laney> wait
[15:36] <Laney> I think the ML discussion actually came to the conclusion of Monday
[15:36] <knome> really?
[15:37] <Laney> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2013-September/002551.html
[15:39] <knome> to me it looks like steve proposed that, but nobody really replied to that
[15:39] <Laney> I don't see anything else
[15:39] <Laney> Kylin asked for longer rather than shorter for beta
[15:40] <knome> yep
[15:40]  * Laney shrugs
[15:40] <Laney> Feels like Monday to me
[15:40] <knome> though since nobody replied saying that's bad, looks like everybody was fine with monday
[15:40] <stgraber> ok, Monday it is then
[15:40] <knome> though to be exact...
[15:41] <knome> steve talked about the *final beta*
[15:41] <Laney> "Monday (for betas)"
[15:41] <knome> oh wait, also "betas"
[15:41] <knome> yeah
[16:02] <doko> Laney, freezing while eglibc is in -proposed?
[16:04] <Laney> not me
[16:23] <stgraber> doko: when can we expect eglibc to get promoted to trusty?
[16:23] <stgraber> s/promoted/moved/
[16:23] <stgraber> I'm guessing it's running through the milion of rdepends adt?
[16:25] <Laney> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1282907
[16:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1282907 in eglibc (Ubuntu) "Block migration of eglibc 2.19 from proposed" [Undecided,New]
[16:25] <doko> stgraber, has an explicit block from infinity
[16:32] <stgraber> doko: ok. I have a meeting with infinity in 30min, will ask there (if he doesn't reply on IRC earlier).
[16:32] <stgraber> doko: anyway, if it lands in say the next 3-4 hours, then that's fine, otherwise it'll have to wait until after we lift the freeze
[16:42] <doko> stgraber, just saying that it might be difficult to pick up things during the freeze which depend on 2.19
[16:49] <stgraber> doko: do we actually expect many things to have a >= 2.19 dependency on libc6?
[16:52] <xnox> stgraber: all of ppc64el, but i guess it had that already anyway.
[16:52] <xnox> (thus shouldn't block migration)
[16:55] <stgraber> xnox: since AFAIK none of the participating flavours have ppc64el images, that probably won't be a big problem.
[16:55] <xnox> libnss-db & nscd are the only ones that picked up 2.19 dependency.
[16:56] <xnox> so anything that uses private 2.19 symbols will get a hard 2.19 dep, but nothing else should.
[17:10] <xnox> my machine keeps getting random segfaults and internal compiler errors, both on the host and chroot.
[17:10] <xnox> i'm not sure what's causing them =/
[17:11] <Laney> meeeeeeeeeeemcheck
[17:11] <xnox> Laney: actually, got point.
[17:12] <ogra> that will teach you to build your own machines :P
[17:12] <xnox> ogra: phf
[17:12] <ogra> :)
[17:34] <stgraber> zequence, superm1_: can you update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/Beta1 please?
[18:05] <stgraber> cron jobs for the flavours that opted in have been turned off now
[18:28] <zequence> stgraber: Thanks
[18:34] <stgraber> zequence: added you to the manifest, updated the migration blocks and turned off your cronjob
[18:47] <zequence> stgraber: Cool
[19:15] <infinity> stgraber: Bah, you freeze blocked eglibc before it could go.
[19:15] <infinity> stgraber: Permission to unblock? :P
[19:16] <stgraber> infinity: sure
[19:16] <doko> and gcc-4.8 too please, once built on powerpc
[19:17] <infinity> I'll get that one too.
[19:18] <doko> and care to overwrite the libreoffice autopkg tests and get python3.4 in too?
[19:19] <doko> then I'm happy for the test rebuild
[19:19] <infinity> doko: That libatomic-ops diff is a lot bigger than the changelog implies...
[19:32] <doko> infinity, fixed
[19:35] <doko> infinity, hrm, and now succeeds  ... ?
[19:37] <infinity> doko: That test is racy.
[19:37] <infinity> doko: Hence why the original bug noted that it passed, then failed, then passed, then failed...
[20:28] <doko> infinity, please accept python-repoze.lru, fixing python3.4 failures
[21:48] <ScottK> If there's a u-d-a moderator around, I'd appreciate you letting my DMB meeting minutes out.
[21:49] <slangasek> done
[21:49] <ScottK> Thanks.