[01:09] <ahoneybun_> I think I can say that after trying 2 langs the docs do not change langs
[07:41] <jussi> how does one turn off whatever libre office integration that makes it crash _all_ the time
[07:41] <jussi> (13.10)
[08:13] <snele> jussi: remove libreoffice-kde and install libreoffice-gtk
[08:14] <snele> oxygen-gtk will do the theming and LO will look much better
[08:14] <snele> you will only lose kde file dialog
[08:15] <soee> works fine here on 14.04 :)
[08:33] <jussi> soee: horribly broken on 13.10
[08:33] <jussi> even with backports
[08:34] <jussi> oh wow, very different look, thanks snele
[08:34] <soee> btw, how does kmail works this days ?
[08:35] <jussi> soee: on 13.10 its working well
[08:35] <jussi> using it everyday for work
[08:36] <snele> jussi: it looks as it should, 100% oxygen (with color radients, shadows on menus etc) :)
[08:36] <jussi> a little bit of slowness fetching mails/firet time reading, but other than that, pretty good
[08:36] <soee> jussi: better than thunderbird ? :D)
[08:37] <jussi> soee: dunno, havent used thunderbird for a good while
[08:37] <soee> ah ok
[08:37] <jussi> soee: give it a go  :)
[08:39] <jussi> woohoo, save as works again
[08:41] <snele> I think that libreoffice-kde is unmaintained and untested. Even LO devs use oxygen-gtk under kde
[08:42] <snele> so maybe it is better to ship libreoffice-gtk because of looks and stability :)
[08:42] <jussi> apachelogger: Riddell shadeslayer et al - thoughts on that proposal ?
[08:44] <apachelogger> darth vader
[08:45] <apachelogger> jussi: munich was working on it AFAIK
[08:45] <jussi> apachelogger: hrm... 
[08:46] <apachelogger> also I doubt anyone ever bothered to report bugs
[08:49] <cff> Why do I get this: qmake: could not open config file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtchooser//default.conf': No such file or directory
[08:49] <apachelogger> soee, jussi: I got no kdeconnect screenshot btw :'<
[08:50] <soee> uhm, apachelogger give me few minutes
[08:50] <cff> When I try to update my system I get http://paste.kde.org/p54hgcbrx/zt484o
[08:50] <apachelogger> cff: qt5-default missing
[08:50] <cff> apachelogger: yes, its not installed
[08:51] <apachelogger> cff: please use #kubuntu for support
[08:56] <apachelogger> starting l10n review #2
[09:01] <apachelogger> kubotu: order coffee
[09:01]  * kubotu slides a cup of steamy hot coffee down the bar to apachelogger.
[09:42] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: http://i.imgur.com/T3tqSzy.png that looks a bit wrong
[09:42] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:22] <apachelogger> ahoneybun, valorie: did you mail kde-i18n-doc and ubuntu-translators about documentation translation?
[10:22] <apachelogger> there doesn't seem to be much movement
[10:35] <apachelogger> god I hate the austrian mirror
[11:31] <apachelogger> soee is hiding now :'<
[11:33] <BluesKaj> Hiyas all
[11:45] <Riddell> proofreaders: how does this read? https://help.ubuntu.com/community/TrustyUpgrades/Kubuntu/12.04LTS
[12:02] <apachelogger> Riddell: looks good
[12:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: it does
[12:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: steps to reproduce?
[12:05] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: install in vbox. start the kcm.
[12:05] <shadeslayer> and it won't pop up on the live system?
[12:05] <apachelogger> dunno, I only tested after install
[12:05] <apachelogger> also I had the vbox guest drivers already installed
[12:05] <apachelogger> so that might be related
[12:05] <shadeslayer> ohm
[12:05] <shadeslayer> I'll have a look after lunch
[12:08] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: - kubuntu-driver-manager suffering from the
[12:08] <shadeslayer> ubuntu-doesnt-do-localization-anymore-problem
[12:08] <shadeslayer> what does that mean ^^ ?
[12:08] <shadeslayer> i.e. no translators
[12:08] <shadeslayer> or dpm needs poking with a pointy stick
[12:09] <apachelogger> dpm
[12:09] <apachelogger> actually a guy other than dpm recently imported kdesudo
[12:09] <apachelogger> then promptly complained that all kdesudo translations were independent imports for some reason so he'd have to click accept 300 times or so
[12:09] <apachelogger> haven't heared from him since
[12:09] <shadeslayer> jussi: ktp backported to staging, mind looking at it?
[12:09] <shadeslayer> jussi: by looking I mean testing
[12:09] <shadeslayer> once it's built
[12:10] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: we might actually want to do issue escalation a bit
[12:10] <apachelogger> spam some mailing lists or something
[12:10] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I hear the ubuntu developers have one
[12:10] <shadeslayer> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com or sth
[12:10] <apachelogger> which is pretty much what was planned for after review 2 anyway
[12:10] <shadeslayer> I agree
[12:10] <apachelogger> if we don't get them imports going soon we'll end up with breakage
[12:10] <shadeslayer> yep
[12:10] <apachelogger> because pitti will also need to adjust the exports and that can go wrong as well
[12:12] <shadeslayer> oh .... :/
[12:12] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: want to start poking? I know very little about the whole l10n stuff
[12:13] <apachelogger> ISO TESTING
[12:13] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: doesn't really need knowledge anyway, just pointing at bug reports and a lot of whining ^^
[12:13] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I can do ISO testing
[12:13] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: btw, if you have a bug for driver-manager not being imported please add it to the card on the review board and move the card to analyzed
[12:13] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: we are both doing iso testing
[12:14] <shadeslayer> oh heh
[12:14] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: you'll do the i386, I'll do the amd64
[12:14] <shadeslayer> http://nooooooooooooooooo.com/
[12:14] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: fine with me
[12:14] <shadeslayer> fyi someone needs to automate this shit
[12:14] <apachelogger> what?
[12:14] <apachelogger> iso testery?
[12:15] <shadeslayer> yes
[12:15] <apachelogger> auto testery does not cut it
[12:15] <shadeslayer> its annoying to do this 4 times a cycle
[12:16] <apachelogger> as I said in some email thread, if people don't feel inclined to do QA, then we should just stop doing releases, safes us a lot of trouble
[12:23] <Riddell> we could gain a lot from doing automatic testing, that would be great.  some manual testing will always be needed
[12:24] <apachelogger> actually I think we'll want to wait for qt5
[12:24] <apachelogger> since our accessibility stuff is just a gigantic patch against qt4
[12:24] <apachelogger> I'd not really trust the results
[12:24] <Riddell> mm
[12:24] <apachelogger> plus we cannot do the stuff upstream due to that
[12:24] <apachelogger> I totally did not think about that when we talked about this in munich
[12:28] <shadeslayer> mmm
[12:29] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: good point
[12:30] <Riddell> shadeslayer: did you do anything fancy to get kde-developer-sdk into muon-discover?
[12:30] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: so "http://websvn.kde.org/*checkout*/branches/stable/l10n-kde4/de/messages/extragear-sysadmin/muon-discover.po" says version is just version
[12:30] <shadeslayer> Riddell: apart from writing a fake desktop file? nope
[12:30] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: yez
[12:30] <Riddell> shadeslayer: right, did that work?
[12:31] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: so why did I have to report a bug last night :P
[12:31] <Riddell> shadeslayer: I don't seem to be able to get it
[12:31] <shadeslayer> maybe app-install-data is outdated
[12:32] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: because I was off work and I did not look at x-test?
[12:32] <apachelogger> you should learn to find out yourself whether something is not translated or not cannot be translated :P
[12:32] <shadeslayer> >.>
[12:36] <Riddell> how come we don't have kdeconnect installed by default?
[12:39] <lordievader> Hmm, no one is testing the i386 image... Shall I?
[12:39] <jussi> lordievader: why not? :D
[12:40] <Riddell> lordievader: please do
[12:40] <lordievader> :)
[12:40] <Riddell> lordievader, apachelogger, shadeslayer: please mark images as testing in progress when you start a test so we don't duplicate, time is of the essence today
[12:40] <apachelogger> lordievader: shadeslayer is testing em, please coordinate
[12:41] <apachelogger> Riddell: dunno how to do that, I only have a button for passed with no bugs...
[12:41] <apachelogger> man that tracker is crap
[12:42] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: there is one to say in progress
[12:42] <shadeslayer> lordievader: feel free to take up the one that I'm not testing
[12:42] <apachelogger> there is one goes on to the individual test page
[12:42] <shadeslayer> aha
[12:42] <shadeslayer> yeah
[12:42] <lordievader> shadeslayer: Ok, will do. Updating image now.
[12:42] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/312/builds/63669/testcases/1300/results
[12:42] <apachelogger> this is like the 90's I swear
[12:43] <shadeslayer> click on "In progress"
[12:43] <shadeslayer> voila
[12:43] <Riddell> apachelogger: on e.g. http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/312/builds/63669/testcases/1303/results click In progress and Submit
[12:43] <shadeslayer> rinse and repeat
[12:43] <apachelogger> yeah
[12:43] <apachelogger> much crap right there
[12:44] <shadeslayer> quite
[12:44] <apachelogger> real developers run 6 VMs in parallel
[12:44] <apachelogger> and subsequently run out of RAM to use the website
[12:44] <apachelogger> no kidding xD
[12:44] <apachelogger> firefox doesn't fit in the remaining memories
[12:44] <shadeslayer> heh
[12:45] <shadeslayer> sounds like your disk is getting it's fair share of action today
[12:46] <apachelogger> the disk is coping well enough, network IO is a drag
[12:46] <shadeslayer> what do you have, a microchip disk :P
[12:46] <apachelogger> particularly since ubiquity insist on using at.archive, which is like the slowest thing in the world
[12:46] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: 3 different disks? :P
[12:47] <shadeslayer> ah you haven't read the article
[12:47] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/schoolboy-invents-computer-system/article5700785.ece
[12:47] <apachelogger> also much like in the 90's, where disks were so small you had to have a couple of them if you had huge amounts of data :P
[12:47] <shadeslayer> atleast he's using KDE ....
[12:47] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: that first sentence fails to parse btw
[12:48] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: "The Guwahati teenager’s prototype uses a microchip instead of a hard disk" ?
[12:48] <apachelogger> City schoolboy Afreed Islam on Monday launched his prototype of a computer system that uses a microchip instead of a hard disk and is embedded with an operative system that allows dependencies on both Windows and Linux-based software simultaneously.
[12:49] <apachelogger> on a much more important note, the schoolboy has a bowtie straightening problem
[12:50] <apachelogger> if bowties were a thing I am sure #bowtiefail would be trending on twitter because people always end up all messed up bowties 

[12:51] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: no shit x 2
[12:52] <shadeslayer> that entire article fails to parse
[12:52] <apachelogger> He said he had collaborated with a German company for manufacturing the computer system. 
[12:52] <apachelogger> at least germans were involved
[12:52] <apachelogger> must be good then
[12:52] <apachelogger> we shoudl also get an operative system though
[12:52] <apachelogger> sounds like quite the hoot
[12:53] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://wowmoron.wordpress.com/2014/02/19/truth-behind-magic-operating-system-developed-by-std-x-student/
[12:53] <Riddell> proofreaders: check out touchpad tool, kde software development kit and kdeconnect updates https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/Beta1/Kubuntu
[12:54] <apachelogger> I do not always watch fox news, but when I do, truth doesn't matter
[12:54] <apachelogger> muhahaha
[12:54] <apachelogger> Riddell: touchpad screenshot is le bad
[12:54] <apachelogger> shadeslayer must make new one
[12:54] <apachelogger> kcm is ugly
[12:54] <apachelogger> Riddell: kdeconnect shot is missized
[12:54] <apachelogger> needs to be 350px
[12:55] <apachelogger> Riddell: oh, what I wanted to ask... what version is that plasma-nm of ours?
[12:55] <apachelogger> 0.9.3.3 git, or 0.9.4 git or 0.10 git
[12:55] <apachelogger> it's much confusing
[12:56] <shadeslayer> mmm ... my food seems to have lost some of it's spicyness overnight
[12:57] <apachelogger> embed an operative system, it will help lots
[12:57] <shadeslayer> my food doesn't have a microchip
[12:57] <shadeslayer> and since Unix is hardware dependent, I can't run it on my food
[12:58] <apachelogger> "wow microchip! such kernel! much module!"
[12:58] <apachelogger> lawl
[12:59] <shadeslayer> I wonder if Novell has a unix kernel that will run on food
[13:00] <Riddell> apachelogger: it's a git snapshot between 0.9.3.2 and 0.9.3.3
[13:00] <apachelogger> "Money cannot buy happiness but it can surely buy patents, media attention and awards."
[13:00] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: that truth is shit
[13:00] <apachelogger> it does not comment on the tie issue!
[13:00] <apachelogger> #truthfail
[13:00] <shadeslayer> lol
[13:01] <apachelogger> Riddell: kthx
[13:01] <apachelogger> Riddell: so I guess we can land .3 proper after freeze
[13:01] <apachelogger> I think that was released today
[13:01] <Riddell> apachelogger: yep
[13:01] <apachelogger> new rule: must not trust people with inproperly tied bow ties and/or not straightened ones
[13:02] <apachelogger> or is it improperly
[13:02] <apachelogger> english much difficult
[13:03] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://imgur.com/dnQ9aPf
[13:03] <apachelogger> Riddell: you broke the sizing of the top download table btw
[13:03]  * apachelogger has exciting 5 seconds of lag now and goes on a coffee break
[13:03] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: new bug: ksni icon is broken
[13:03] <shadeslayer> how so
[13:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: there is no touchpad on this machine
[13:04] <apachelogger> because it looks like shoot
[13:04] <apachelogger> icons are not meant to look like shoot
[13:04] <apachelogger> -> coffee
[13:04] <shadeslayer> I am not even sure what that means
[13:04] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: please report upstream
[13:09]  * apachelogger conducts fist shaking
[13:10] <apachelogger> amd64 oem test pending if someone wants to do that
[13:10] <apachelogger> gotta go afk for half an hour or so
[13:11] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: will get to it if no one looks at it
[13:33] <lordievader> Would this be a bug with KVM or with Ubiquity?: http://lordievader.no-ip.org/files/trusty-kvm.png
[13:36] <shadeslayer> mmm
[13:37] <shadeslayer> lordievader: looks like a ubiquity bug to me
[13:37] <shadeslayer> lordievader: I'll try and reproduce it on real hardware
[13:37] <shadeslayer> just to be sure
[13:37] <lordievader> shadeslayer: It's the i386 iso.
[13:37] <shadeslayer> yep
[13:37] <shadeslayer> that's the one I'm testing
[13:37] <lordievader> shadeslayer: You haven't seen it?
[13:38] <shadeslayer> I haven't run the OEM setup yet
[13:38] <shadeslayer> since you were doing it
[13:38] <lordievader> After the install I'll check if I get it for the 'normal' mode too.
[13:40] <shadeslayer> it's fine in normal mode
[13:40] <shadeslayer> lordievader: fwiw I get it in VBox too
[13:40] <shadeslayer> it's a matter of not having enough space
[13:40] <lordievader> So it seems.
[13:40] <shadeslayer> xnox: ^^
[13:43] <Riddell> shadeslayer, lordievader: mostly that's an agateau ping, it's caused by it changing to a windowed application
[13:44] <shadeslayer> oh
[13:44] <Riddell> lordievader,shadeslayer: anyone want to report a bug?
[13:44] <shadeslayer> lordievader: ^^ you discovered it :P
[13:45] <lordievader> Ugh, just through Launchpad or using the ubuntu-bug utility?
[13:45] <agateau> hu, I assume you are talking about the cropped text in the big buttons?
[13:45] <sgclark> Riddell: I don't see kactivities-kf5 in the PPA
[13:45] <xnox> shadeslayer: yeah, i have nothing to do with qt frontend styling issues =)
[13:46] <shadeslayer> agateau: yep
[13:46] <shadeslayer> agateau: resizing the window to be a bit bigger fixes the problem
[13:47] <Riddell> sgclark: fixing
[13:47] <agateau> shadeslayer: is it specific to the "system manufacturer mode" (which I assume is OEM)?
[13:47] <shadeslayer> agateau: yep
[13:47] <agateau> ok
[13:47] <agateau> will look into it
[13:47] <shadeslayer> agateau: I suppose it's the text field at the botton
[13:47] <shadeslayer> *bottom
[13:48] <lordievader> Is there still need for a bug report?
[13:48] <agateau> lordievader: always nice to be able to link a branch to a bug report :)
[13:49] <Riddell> sgclark: should be up now, I need to add -sa to bzr-buildpackage-ppa so it uploads the orig.tar as well
[13:49] <Riddell> lordievader: yes please
[13:49] <sgclark> Riddell: ty
[13:49] <shadeslayer> mm
[13:49] <lordievader> Err where tough? https://launchpad.net/ubiquity doesn't let me report a bug...
[13:50] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: http://i.imgur.com/WmQkGVr.png < first line untranslated?
[13:51] <xnox> lordievader: that project does not track bugs, please file bugs with $ ubuntu-bug ubiquity, which is against ubiquity package in ubuntu distribution
[13:51] <lordievader> xnox: Ok, will do. Thank you.
[13:52] <xnox> lordievader: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+filebug
[13:54] <Riddell> sgclark: failed on i386
[13:56] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: yes, if you recall, we had like a card for that, that you actually got semi-done, just in case you forgot :O
[13:56] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: what what what
[13:56] <shadeslayer> actually
[13:56] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: como ?
[13:57] <apachelogger> it's a space ship
[13:57] <shadeslayer> yay
[13:57] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ah the untranslated line
[13:57] <lordievader> xnox/agateau: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1285679
[13:58] <agateau> lordievader: thanks
[13:58] <shadeslayer> yeah, attribute that to the gtk ui blocking progress :P
[13:58] <sgclark> Riddell: i386 patched
[14:00]  * shadeslayer yawns
[14:01] <sgclark> Riddell: eer one moment error
[14:01] <shadeslayer> agateau: I like how you're holding 2 other boats in the picture on qa.kubuntu.co.uk
[14:02] <agateau> shadeslayer: am I?
[14:02] <shadeslayer> "if I go down, all 5 of you are going down with me, muwahaha"
[14:02] <sgclark> Riddell: i386 is nwow really patched
[14:02] <shadeslayer> agateau: http://qa.kubuntu.co.uk/
[14:03] <shadeslayer> unless that's not you in the 2nd boat from the left
[14:03] <agateau> shadeslayer: that's me indeed :)
[14:05] <apachelogger> kubuntu - assuring boat quality since 2004
[14:05] <shadeslayer> someone needs to automate boat QA
[14:06]  * apachelogger does screenshot balacing
[14:07] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: how does resizing work?
[14:07] <shadeslayer> in ubiquity
[14:08] <apachelogger> [                                                        ] -> [                              ][                          ] 
[14:09] <shadeslayer> what if I have [                                                 ][[                    ][                              ]]
[14:10] <apachelogger>  [                                                 ][[                    ][                              ]] ->  [                               ][                  ][[                    ][                              ]]
[14:11] <apachelogger> artwork balanced
[14:11] <apachelogger> !!!! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/Beta1/Kubuntu PLEASE PROOFREAD!!!!
[14:13] <shadeslayer> can't get it work :(
[14:26] <Riddell> anyone able to confirm if bug 1259465 is still a problem with the new plasma-nm?
[14:29] <Riddell> shadeslayer: did your fix to bug 1232156 get uploaded?
[14:30] <shadeslayer> Riddell: don't think so
[14:32] <shadeslayer> bug would have closed otherwise
[14:33] <Riddell> bugs updated on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/Beta1/Kubuntu  do review incase there's other ones we should highlight
[14:33] <Riddell> apachelogger: kdeconnect image disappeared?
[14:34] <apachelogger> Riddell: refresh?
[14:34] <Riddell> apachelogger: yay working :)
[14:35] <Riddell> "KDEConnect" or "KDE Connect" ?
[14:35] <Riddell> google says "KDE Connect"
[14:38] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: mind making a new kubuntu-notification-helper snapshot
[14:39] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: beta freeze
[14:39] <apachelogger> why snappy?
[14:48] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: bug fixes
[14:48] <apachelogger> still won't get in :P
[14:48] <apachelogger> 64bit iso tests done
[14:48] <shadeslayer> mmkay
[14:48] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: mind doing 32 bit resize test
[14:48] <shadeslayer> I can't get it to show up
[14:48] <apachelogger> yes
[14:49] <apachelogger> I have no i386 ISO
[14:49] <shadeslayer> download it
[14:49] <apachelogger> yeah, takes an hour
[14:49] <shadeslayer> move to the office
[14:49] <apachelogger> takes even longer
[14:49] <shadeslayer> one time investment
[14:49] <shadeslayer> think of all the porn you could download
[14:50] <apachelogger> yes
[14:50] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: what if I gave you VNC access
[14:50] <shadeslayer> would that work
[14:54] <shadeslayer> lordievader: any news on the OEM install?
[14:55] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: probably
[14:55] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: ok
[14:55] <lordievader> shadeslayer: Seems to be fine furthermore.
[14:57] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: bah , port is probably going to be blocked on the router
[14:58] <apachelogger> it's the way of the port
[14:58] <apachelogger> what's the problem anyway
[14:58] <apachelogger> create VM, crate 32 gib harddisk for vm, install on entire harddisk, go to installer again, use resize option
[14:59] <shadeslayer> yeah, didn't work when I tried it
[14:59] <shadeslayer> no resize option
[14:59] <shadeslayer> and this was on a 300 GB disk
[15:00] <apachelogger> noob? :P
[15:00] <Riddell> shadeslayer: bug 1268931  "I tested an update from 12.04 LTS to 14.04 Beta 1 and I'm not convinced this worked. Needs more investigation"
[15:01] <shadeslayer> screenshot of kickoff plz
[15:03] <Riddell> shadeslayer: well that's why I'm a bit fuzzy, I have changed my install since and I need to reconfirm
[15:03] <shadeslayer> oh ok
[15:04] <apachelogger> https://trello.com/c/qGUHojpT
[15:18] <shadeslayer> agateau: IIRC it reads the parameter from the command boot arguments
[15:18] <agateau> shadeslayer: ok I am going to investigate
[15:23] <lordievader> agateau: Hit F4 when you get the boot menu of the iso (might have to hit esc a few time) and then select OEM mode.
[15:29] <agateau> lordievader: yes, but if I do this I don't get to test my code :/
[15:30]  * agateau hacks an ugly workaround
[15:31] <lordievader> agateau: Then I have no idea...
[15:39] <sgclark> Riddell: kactivities copyright and description is complete, please upload again.
[15:44] <agateau> Riddell: wanna review the oem button fix for Ubiquity, or should I assign shadeslayer instead?
[15:47] <Riddell> agateau: sorry I'm about to run away until monday, shadeslayer is your man
[15:48] <shadeslayer> agateau: well, I can't merge it into ubiquity since I don't have permissions
[15:48] <Riddell> sgclark: uploaded!
[15:49] <Riddell> sgclark: as above, I'm about to run away until monday, nudge someone else useful if you need reviews etc
[15:49] <Riddell> shadeslayer, apachelogger, lordievader: thanks much for doing testing today, can I mark the images as good for release and leave the rest to you?
[15:50] <shadeslayer> Riddell: trying to figure out how to get resize working
[15:51] <agateau> Riddell: shadeslayer: ok, here is the request anyway https://code.launchpad.net/~agateau/ubiquity/kde-fix-cropped-greeter-buttons/+merge/208628
[15:51] <Riddell> shadeslayer: you just need to install it on a big enough disk that it has space to resize a second install
[15:56] <shadeslayer> agateau: I think it looks fine
[15:56] <agateau> \o/
[15:56] <ovidiu-florin> jussi: thank you
[15:56] <ovidiu-florin> jussi: I just got the stickers
[15:57] <shadeslayer> agateau: I haven't tested it, just looking at the ui file changes
[15:57] <shadeslayer> agateau: though are lines 8 and 9 required?
[15:57] <shadeslayer> i.e. looks like an un-necessary change
[16:00] <agateau> shadeslayer: no they probably are not, it's just Designer doing its things
[16:01] <agateau> the change should be harmless though
[16:07] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: https://code.launchpad.net/~agateau/ubiquity/kde-fix-cropped-greeter-buttons/+merge/208628
[16:07] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: plz review
[16:10] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: yeah I can't get resizing to work
[16:10] <shadeslayer> Did a fresh isntall of trusty on a disk -> restart -> start installer again -> no option to resize
[16:13]  * apachelogger needs to to get a haircut
[16:13] <apachelogger> it's all over the place
[16:13] <apachelogger> and that beard :@
[16:13] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: you are doing it wrong
[16:14] <apachelogger> clearly
[16:14] <shadeslayer> well, I did it as you mentioned it before :P
[16:16] <jussi> ovidiu-florin: excellent :)
[16:16] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: so what do you reckon is going wrong
[16:16] <apachelogger> pebkac
[16:17] <shadeslayer> that doesn't help :/
[16:17] <apachelogger> yeah, I'll make a video for you
[16:17] <apachelogger> on windows, windows shall teach you how to install kubuntu :P
[16:17] <soee> what should be on that screenshot from kde connect ?
[16:17]  * apachelogger heads out
[16:17] <apachelogger> soee: too late, already have one :P
[16:17] <soee> :<
[16:18] <apachelogger> you said 5 minutes, 8 hours later we are now :P
[16:18] <soee> yeah, iv created new account but had to drive to meeting, and just returned :(
[16:54] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: i386 resizing is definitely broken
[16:54] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: because Precise showed me an option to resize, but I installed it to the full disk
[16:54] <shadeslayer> 14.04 doesn't show it at all
[17:39] <ovidiu-florin> jussi: do I owe you anything for them?
[17:40] <jussi> ovidiu-florin: nothing. they were paid for by the KC, all you need to do is use them at events and other useful places
[17:40] <ovidiu-florin> great
[18:38] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vefcv7yx8pg -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DY0drOhl3y0 -> I win
[18:41] <shadeslayer> dafuq
[18:41] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I don't get that option
[18:41] <shadeslayer> so good for you
[18:41] <apachelogger> because pebkac
[18:41] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I'm running upgrade tests
[18:41] <shadeslayer> :/
[18:42] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: it shows up in precise
[18:42] <apachelogger> upgrade tests are scheduled for next week I think
[18:42] <apachelogger> or the week after
[18:42] <shadeslayer> did not see the time date on their
[18:42] <shadeslayer> I thought it was part of the testing today
[18:43] <shadeslayer> anyway, it's already upgrading
[18:43] <shadeslayer> and I want to check my kconf_update script
[18:45] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: btw
[18:46] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: thoughts on http://paste.ubuntu.com/7006561/
[18:46] <shadeslayer> it's a hack to make reset not do anything
[19:46] <miseria> "el amor inicia con la velocidad de tus ojos, aterriza en el poder de tu mente se cristaliza con la piel de tus manos" bienvenidos: http://castroruben.com *temo_a_un_ser_sin_rival*
[19:51] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kde-workspace/+bug/1274219
[19:51] <shadeslayer> omg KDE Workspace bugs < 100
[20:02] <shadeslayer> ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/akonadi/+bug/838796
[20:15] <kubotu> ::workspace-bugs:: [1283692] My graphic card seems incompatible with Kubuntu 13.10 @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283692 (by genetin)
[20:31] <shadeslayer> sigh
[20:32] <shadeslayer> I don't understand why kde-workspace-bin from https://launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/experimental/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=trusty thinks it depends on  kde-workspace-bin : Depends: kde-style-oxygen (= 4:4.11.6-0ubuntu2) but 4:4.11.6-0ubuntu3~ppa1 is to be installed
[20:35] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: are you going to publish the news on kubuntu.org?
[20:36] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: I'm heading home
[20:36] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: I don't have access to a rekonq/konqueror right now
[20:36] <shadeslayer> fooey
[20:36] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: are you on when you are home?
[20:36] <shadeslayer> neither do I xD
[20:37] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: yeah
[20:37] <apachelogger> but you can install a rekonq/konqueror? :P
[20:37] <shadeslayer> aye
[20:37] <apachelogger>  goody then
[20:37] <shadeslayer> apachelogger: will update once home?
[20:38] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: yeah it's not out yet anyway
[20:38] <shadeslayer> I also don't see the announcement on ubuntu-devel
[20:38] <shadeslayer> yep ^^
[20:38] <apachelogger> just checking
[20:38] <apachelogger> otherwise I'll have to drive home :P
[20:38] <shadeslayer> heh
[20:38] <shadeslayer> I'll prepare a post once home
[20:39] <apachelogger> kthx
[21:15]  * ScottK announced on kubuntu.org
[21:25] <ScottK> apachelogger: I put the announce on kubuntu.org
[21:25] <ScottK> Feel free to improve it though.
[21:32] <shadeslayer> oh
[21:32] <shadeslayer> ScottK: thx
[21:33] <shadeslayer> I didn't see it on the ML so I didn't bother coming online
[21:53] <apachelogger> it's a perfect
[21:55] <apachelogger> g+'d
[22:04] <soee> hi, guys any idea whyb homerun-kicker doesnt work on 14.04 (widget)
[23:46] <ronnoc> apachelogger: You guys should hashtag your G+ posts with #kubuntu (and perhaps #kde) as well so people can find you easier. I just G+ -searched for #kubuntu and the Official Page never comes up at all.  
[23:46] <ronnoc> would make it easier for people to find us :)
[23:59] <valorie> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/Beta1/Kubuntu : "Muon Discver 2.2 Alpha 1" > Muon Discover 2.2 Alpha 1