[01:01] <darkxst> infinity, can you take a look at gnome-online-miners in NEW ( I assume it doesn't need an FFe since it was uploaded before freeze?)
[01:04] <infinity> darkxst: I'll try to get to it.  Running around like a crazy person tonight before an early flight tomorrow.
[01:05] <infinity> darkxst: And no, it's probably fine without an FFe.  In fact, unless it's being added to a seed, a new package likely doesn't need an FFe at all.
[01:05] <darkxst> it will be seeded on ubuntu-gnome
[01:05] <infinity> Alright, then it sort of should have one, but meh.  Verbal FFe preliminarily granted, assuming it passes NEW review. :P
[01:06] <darkxst> infinity, thanks!
[13:41] <ockham> i'd like to ask how to proceed with https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286073
[13:41] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1286073 in gourmet (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Please update gourmet to 0.17.0" [Undecided,New]
[13:42] <ockham> infinity: ^
[16:43] <xnox> Please remove motion and minidlna, bug 1253071. That is the last two holding up libav8 (nbs). The rest is ported.
[16:43] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1253071 in motion (Ubuntu) "Removed from testing, RC-buggy, FTBFS against libav9" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1253071
[23:26] <Noskcaj> Can someone please look at bug 1282937
[23:26] <ubot2`> Launchpad bug 1282937 in xfburn (Ubuntu) "FFe: Please package xfburn 0.5.0" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1282937