[08:39] <Cimi> tsdgeos, morning!
[08:40] <tsdgeos> Cimi: hi
[08:41] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: do you know what happened with that merge of yours?
[08:41] <tsdgeos> was supposed to be part of a CI train and failed to land?
[08:43] <Cimi> tsdgeos, was wondering what we plan of doing today :)
[08:43] <tsdgeos> Cimi: aren't you flying?
[08:44] <tsdgeos> like "now"?
[08:44] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I'm at the airport lounge, have to kill a couple of hours, then I'll work on the plane
[08:44] <tsdgeos> Cimi: so my plan is going back to making the qmltests/autopilot tests of  lp:~aacid/unity8/new-scopes-cleanup  finally pass
[08:45] <Cimi> you need help?
[08:45] <Cimi> want to split work?
[08:45] <tsdgeos> i still don't know what needs doing :D
[08:45] <tsdgeos> Cimi: but sure
[08:45] <Cimi> ahah ok
[08:45] <tsdgeos> Cimi: get it installled and let's both run qmluitests and autopilot
[08:45] <Cimi> ok
[08:45] <tsdgeos> and let's see if we both get the same errors (that'd be a good start)
[08:46] <tsdgeos> and once we know what fails we can see how we split it
[08:46] <tsdgeos> dednick: if you have some time could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/indicator_highlight_x_position/+merge/209400 ?
[08:46] <dednick> tsdgeos: sure
[08:48] <tsdgeos> dednick: added some what to do in the description of the MR
[08:52] <dednick> tsdgeos: hm. my indicators aren't showing up at all now (even without your MP).
[08:52] <tsdgeos> dednick: :S
[08:52] <tsdgeos> dednick: phone or desktop?
[08:53] <addiks> hi, is there a official git-repository for unity which gets regular updates?
[08:53] <dednick> tsdgeos: desktop
[08:53] <tsdgeos> right i had this
[08:53] <tsdgeos> i don't remember what i was missing
[08:53] <tsdgeos> try a build -s && build -c cycle
[08:53] <tsdgeos> just to make sure
[08:55] <dednick> tsdgeos: hm. i don't need to recompile things for 5.2 do I? (eg qmenumodel)
[08:55] <tsdgeos> dednick: you do
[08:55] <tsdgeos> dednick: but there's a ppa for that :D
[08:55] <tsdgeos> so you don't
[08:55] <tsdgeos> dednick: you using the ppa?
[08:55] <dednick> tsdgeos: yep
[08:55] <tsdgeos> if so it should give you all you nee
[08:55] <tsdgeos> just dist-upgrade
[08:59] <tsdgeos> Cimi: also i think you submitted a MR for merging against new-scopes? Saviq said we should target trunk with a pre-requisite in new-scopes
[08:59] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I did
[09:00] <Cimi> tsdgeos, https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/carouselTool-new-dash/+merge/209746
[09:00] <tsdgeos> meh, lots of dependencies there
[09:01] <Cimi> tsdgeos, FAIL!  : tst_DirectionalDragArea::sceneYAndY()
[09:01] <Cimi> fails for me
[09:01] <tsdgeos> Cimi: make -i so you run all of them
[09:02] <Cimi> tsdgeos, do we have log of fails?
[09:02] <Cimi> tsdgeos, or shall I play with bash?
[09:02] <tsdgeos> Cimi: wait, the gnome shell doesn't have searching?
[09:02] <Cimi> tsdgeos, maybe it does, but I expect long output
[09:03] <tsdgeos> you should switch to konsole :D
[09:03] <tsdgeos> infinite output and search
[09:03] <Cimi> tsdgeos, infinite ram usage
[09:03] <tsdgeos> not really
[09:03] <tsdgeos> there's a thing called, writing to disk ;-)
[09:05] <tsdgeos> Cimi: actually use lp:~unity-team/unity8/new-scopes-cleanup instead of  lp:~aacid/unity8/new-scopes-cleanup
[09:05] <tsdgeos> seems Saviq "stole" the branch and i didn't realize
[09:09] <tsdgeos> Cimi: also do you have 5.0 or 5.2 installed?
[09:09] <tsdgeos> i think we should go with 5.0 first
[09:09] <tsdgeos> and once it's clean there
[09:09] <tsdgeos> do the 5.2 dance
[09:14] <tsdgeos> Cimi: and i just merged trunk into new-scopes into new-scopes-clean-to-trunk and into new-scopes-cleanup, so update :D
[09:23] <Mirv> tsdgeos: just in case you're not aware, the upgrade instructions have new PPA:s: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-beta2 <- beta2 itself is legacy. not much functional difference, but still, final is final.
[09:23] <Cimi> tsdgeos, http://paste.ubuntu.com/7048948/
[09:23] <Cimi> tsdgeos, ok redoing all
[09:24] <Cimi> tsdgeos, your branch is updated?
[09:24] <Cimi> nope
[09:24] <Cimi> using unity-team
[09:31] <tsdgeos> Mirv: isn't that the same ppa?
[09:31] <tsdgeos> Cimi: this is mine http://paste.ubuntu.com/7048981/
[09:32] <tsdgeos> Type Shell unavailable looks werid
[09:32] <Mirv> tsdgeos: the front page I linked to has the new instructions, since I thought people still go to that page
[09:32] <tsdgeos> ah
[09:32] <tsdgeos> Mirv: so landing.006 has everything that ppa has?
[09:32] <tsdgeos> Saviq told me it didn't have everything
[09:33] <Mirv> tsdgeos: +beta1 like it says
[09:33] <tsdgeos> man i can't read
[09:33] <tsdgeos> sorry ^_^
[09:33] <Mirv> tsdgeos: currently landing-006 now has everything except unity-scope-click and unity8, and those come from the beta1 still until I've landed those two to the landing-006
[09:33] <Mirv> no problem :)
[09:33] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I'm rebuilding the branch from scratch
[09:35] <tsdgeos> i wonder how verticaljournal broke
[09:35] <tsdgeos> the damn thing is broken in trunk too :_S?
[09:36] <tsdgeos> that is weird
[09:36] <tsdgeos> isn't it passing in CI ?
[09:37] <tsdgeos> my computer is borked, getting all kind of horizontally flashing stuff on qmlscene, let me reboot
[09:38] <dednick> tsdgeos: any idea why your panel branch failed CI?
[09:45] <tsdgeos> ahhhh, i think i know what's wrong
[09:47] <mhr3> Mirv, 5.2 landing happening today?
[09:47] <tsdgeos> someone broke compiz
[09:47] <tsdgeos> or unity7
[09:47] <tsdgeos> and that's why verticaljournaltest is not passing anymore
[09:48] <tsdgeos> who do i complain to?
[09:49] <Mirv> mhr3: it can happen, but there are two requirements. 1. promote Qt 5.0.2 image (or decide not to promote), 2. fix bug #1207270 in acceptable way (it is now fixed as of today, but has two remaining smaller issues)
[09:49] <Mirv> ok, 3. SDK team finalizes QtC plugins so I can land them, but I have no doubt about that :)
[09:49] <tsdgeos> awesome, i'm now getting a crash in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so
[09:49] <tsdgeos> \o/ not
[09:49] <Mirv> mhr3: so Monday is slightly more probable
[09:50] <Mirv> but still, if all stars align, there's nothing preventing today either
[09:50] <mhr3> Mirv, sooo.. realistically tuesday? :)
[09:50] <Cimi> tsdgeos, http://paste.ubuntu.com/7049072/
[09:50] <tsdgeos> right
[09:50] <Cimi> tsdgeos, with new branch
[09:50] <tsdgeos> that is closer to what i get
[09:51] <Cimi> tsdgeos, tell me quickly which ones shall I do on flight :)
[09:51] <Cimi> I have to leave soon
[09:51] <tsdgeos> Cimi: note that VerticalJournalTest and OrganicGridTest are because of compiz regressions and they fail in trunk too
[09:51] <Mirv> mhr3: haha :) it's really tough debate at the moment
[09:51] <tsdgeos> Cimi: run them with xvfb-run -s "-screen 0 1024x768x24" make testOrganicGrid and the failures go away
[09:52] <Cimi> tsdgeos, let me do the first ones then
[09:52] <tsdgeos> Cimi: so run them all with xvfb-run first to be sure too
[09:52] <tsdgeos> and if not move onto autopilot
[09:54] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I'll do the first ones
[09:54] <tsdgeos> ok
[09:54] <tsdgeos> Cimi: do they fail with xvfb-run too?
[09:56] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I'll do in a bit, have to leave now
[09:56] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I'll talk back in London
[09:56] <tsdgeos> Cimi: sure, run!
[10:27] <Mirv> tsdgeos: locking down unity8 for Qt 5.2 landing
[10:28] <tsdgeos> Mirv: what does that exactly mean?
[10:28] <Mirv> tsdgeos: that means I have an empty merge proposal I'll include in the CI Train, so no other silo can build unity8 but Qt 5.2
[10:28] <tsdgeos> ok
[10:28] <Mirv> nothing else really
[10:29] <Mirv> it also means that the last two packages get to the landing-006, so after that it's self-sufficient
[10:29] <tsdgeos> this unity7 regression in view sizes is really a pain
[10:30] <tsdgeos> tst_DirectionalDragArea is also failing because of it
[10:30] <tsdgeos> sil2100: do you know who do i talk about unity7 regressions?
[10:30] <tsdgeos> didrocks: or you?
[10:31] <didrocks> tsdgeos: bregma is the first contanct
[10:31] <sil2100> tsdgeos: bregma I would say
[10:31] <Mirv> tsdgeos: breg_ma is leading the U7 team, I guess file bugs and ping
[10:31] <didrocks> tsdgeos: you can as well try Trevinho
[10:31] <didrocks> 3 for bregma, 1 Trevinho :)
[10:31] <Mirv> :D
[10:31] <didrocks> counts are opened!
[10:31] <sil2100> Place your bets! ..?
[10:31] <tsdgeos> he's on the americas, no?
[10:32] <didrocks> bregma is in canada, so same timezone yeah
[10:32] <Mirv> yes
[10:32] <didrocks> Trevinho has weird working hours, so if you are lucky… (italia)
[10:35] <tsdgeos> Mirv: because you didn't do any recent patch to qt 5.0.2, right?
[10:35] <Mirv> tsdgeos: "because"? no, no recent patches to 5.0.2
[10:36] <tsdgeos> Mirv: i'm gtting a regression in widget size including decoration size, and wanted to rule out qt being the culprit
[10:36] <Mirv> tsdgeos: two latest were 0001-Do-not-overwrite-basePixmap-of-QIconLoader-PixmapEnt.patch + fix_destroy_qapp_segfault.diff
[10:37] <tsdgeos> sight
[10:37] <tsdgeos> right
[10:37] <Mirv> those landed Feb 6th
[10:42] <dednick> tsdgeos: ping
[10:42] <tsdgeos> dednick: yes?
[10:43] <dednick> tsdgeos: you know why it's failing? https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/unity-phablet-qmluitests-trusty/1298/console
[10:43] <tsdgeos> QXcbConnection: XCB error: 148 (Unknown), sequence: 149, resource id: 0, major code: 140 (Unknown), minor code: 20
[10:43] <tsdgeos> when that happens
[10:44] <tsdgeos> you need to retrigger a build
[10:44] <tsdgeos> may be related to the bug i fixed the other day in Qt
[10:44] <tsdgeos> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,80007
[10:44] <tsdgeos> Mirv: did you get the email about integrating ↑ in 5.2 packages?
[10:46] <tsdgeos> dednick: so just retrigger
[10:46] <dednick> tsdgeos: yup. doing
[10:48] <dednick> tsdgeos: otherwise the branch looks fine. If that issue was just a random one, I can just approve?
[10:48] <tsdgeos> dednick: sure
[10:54] <tsdgeos> Mirv: so how is this thing going to work? because trunk still has some tests that don't pass with 5.2
[11:06] <Mirv> tsdgeos: I saw it, but haven't had time for it. trunk seems to have built fine at least
[11:06] <tsdgeos> Mirv: sure, it builds, running the tests is a differnt thing altogether :D
[11:06] <Mirv> tsdgeos: some AP is failing?
[11:07] <tsdgeos> Mirv: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/fix-5.2-tests/+merge/209058 fixes some qmluitests
[11:07] <tsdgeos> i think AP were working
[11:07] <Mirv> hmmkay..
[11:07] <tsdgeos> but it was Saviq trying them
[11:07] <tsdgeos> so i may be wrong
[11:09] <Mirv> we should have new PPA AP results soon. and it's not that 100% is green immediately. but that's good to know. if the landing will be postponed to Monday, I may get to make another qtbase upload
[11:09] <Mirv> or then afterwards
[11:47] <Mirv> tsdgeos: Tuesday's tests had 1 unity8 AP failure http://q-jenkins:8080/job/autopilot-release-gatekeeper/58/#showFailuresLink
[11:47] <Mirv> after that they've unfortunately had adb problems which still seem unresolved
[11:48] <tsdgeos> www.q-jenkins.com '?
[11:50] <tsdgeos> Mirv: what ip is that?
[11:51] <Mirv> tsdgeos: 10.98.3.12
[11:54] <tsdgeos> Mirv: never seen that AP test fail
[11:56] <mhr3_> Mirv, if i'm looking correctly at the landing-006 ppa, it's no longer necessary to combine it with the beta ppa, right?
[12:00] <Mirv> mhr3_: yep, just updated the instructions too
[12:00] <Mirv> mhr3_: unity8 and unity-scope-click are now there, which were the last ones (well, aside from two QtC plugins)
[12:36] <mzanetti> lol... 50% of the new scopes code is "// TODO karni". I think I know why he left the unity team again :D
[12:37] <karni> mzanetti: lol, don't be like that! :D
[12:37] <mzanetti> karni: scnr
[12:37] <mzanetti> :)
[12:37] <karni> mzanetti: 70% of my TODOs is the damn Ubuntu Palette ;P
[12:38] <mzanetti> yeah...
[12:38] <Cimi> tsdgeos, can I push?
[12:38] <tsdgeos> Cimi: what where?
[12:38] <Cimi> fixed one test
[12:38] <karni> mzanetti: I'm well aware I left a lot of TODOs, but they were not something I could do immediately. I have no idea how we should upgrade Ubuntu Palette without regressing. new version (like, 2.0) for the Phone?
[12:38] <karni> mzanetti: :)
[12:38] <Cimi> the other one, directional drag area, is yet to be fixed
[12:39] <Cimi> I understood what's wrong
[12:39] <Cimi> but I need more time
[12:39] <tsdgeos> Cimi: i fixed it
[12:39] <tsdgeos> it's compiz that is silly
[12:39] <Cimi> I'm in london btw :)
[12:39] <karni> mzanetti: plus, it's not that I left really. I'm happy to help with any pending TODO that *I* can fix :)
[12:39] <mzanetti> karni: no worries... but doing the review those TODO's hit me all over  so I had to say this :)
[12:39] <tsdgeos> Cimi: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/vjog_compiz_workaround/+merge/209877
[12:39] <karni> mzanetti: every single TODO has been thoroughly discussed with tsdgeos and Saviq
[12:39] <karni> mzanetti: I understand :)
[12:39] <tsdgeos> i guess i can merge it to that branch to the cleanup thing
[12:40] <karni> mzanetti: so, it's not like I left those TODO's cuz I felt like so :)
[12:40] <tsdgeos> or new-scopes actually
[12:40] <tsdgeos> Cimi: which test did you fix?
[12:40] <karni> mzanetti: if there's any conflicts when merging, I'm also happy to help
[12:41] <mzanetti> karni: I think Saviq reverted 99% of the conflicting code so there shouldn't be much of an issue
[12:41] <karni> mzanetti: at least I have the balls to sign my TODOs, compared to the whole rest of 'em ;D
[12:42] <mzanetti> karni: haha :D
[12:42] <mzanetti> true
[12:42] <karni> mzanetti: I see. In any case, I'm still available if needed :)
[12:42] <mzanetti> ack, thanks
[12:42] <karni> :)
[12:52] <Cimi> tsdgeos, genericscopeview
[12:53] <Cimi> gonna fix dda if you didn't yet
[12:53] <tsdgeos> Cimi: read up
[12:53] <tsdgeos> i did, even gave you a link :D
[12:53] <tsdgeos> Cimi: what was wrong with genericscopeview?
[12:54] <Cimi> small bug
[12:54] <Cimi> i will push in 30 mins
[12:54] <Cimi> tsdgeos, same branch?
[12:54] <tsdgeos> sure
[12:54] <tsdgeos> i'd like to see the diff since it was working here :S
[12:55] <tsdgeos> maybe it was an unstable one?
[13:28] <Cimi> tsdgeos, pushed fix
[13:29] <Cimi> tsdgeos, was due to refactor of the visuals
[13:30] <Cimi> tsdgeos, http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/new-scopes-cleanup/revision/715
[13:32] <Cimi> tsdgeos, which unity7/compiz regression?
[13:32] <Cimi> tsdgeos, can it be the CSS window decorator?
[13:32] <Cimi> Trevinho, we have bugs with height
[13:45] <dandrader> kgunn, so, should I take over https://bugs.launchpad.net/mir/+bug/1289058 ?
[14:05] <tsdgeos> Cimi: the decoration is "eating" into the window size
[14:05] <tsdgeos> Cimi: ah cool, thanks
[14:10] <tsdgeos> Cimi: can you run autopilot ones now?
[14:10] <tsdgeos> so we sync what's failing and not
[14:30] <mzanetti> @unity: standup
[14:37] <Trevinho> Cimi: yes, I know, it's a compiz thing... And well I actually just didn't push the correct change :/, anyway once I'm out the rush I?m now, i'll fix it.
[14:41] <greyback> dandrader: just to tell you, I'm not trying to fix the OSK bug any more, just was trying to assemble a list of MRs which can unblock mir0.1.6
[14:42] <dandrader> greyback, ok, so I can have all the fun for myself now! :)
[14:42] <greyback> dandrader: if you want :)
[14:42] <greyback> dandrader: how was unity8 with qtsg going?
[14:43] <dandrader> greyback, well, the simple stage is rock solid now
[14:43] <dandrader> greyback, simple as in it supports only one app/window at a time
[14:44] <dandrader> greyback, it's all pretty smooth. but there's a lot of work ahead still
[14:44] <greyback> dandrader: okay cool
[14:44] <dandrader> greyback, I'm not minding some low level bugs though. will leave them when we meet with mir folks on the sprint
[14:45] <dandrader> so I don't get stuck
[14:45] <greyback> dandrader: what kind of bugs?
[14:45] <greyback> should we make a list
[14:45] <greyback> ?
[14:47] <dandrader> greyback, https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1IiHBDIW_e0qnGt-po1D2z5HJKrNhBwh6pdILeEN2sgA/edit#heading=h.u205ol3r35vr
[14:47] <dandrader> just put my local notes into this doc
[14:49] <greyback> dandrader: the "not respond to input" issue, did you try tapping the power key? Might be powerd powering down the input hardware, but leaving the screen up
[14:49] <greyback> -up+on
[14:51] <greyback> dandrader: also the lightdm thing, are you restarting lightdm (and unity8) to fix it?
[14:53] <dandrader> greyback, no, I didn't
[14:54] <dandrader> greyback, as for lightdm, didn't play much with it.
[14:55] <dandrader> greyback, I was just focusing on getting unity8 work done so that we have something nice to show asap.
[14:55] <greyback> dandrader: sure
[14:59] <greyback> dandrader: texture provider sounds like a race, as if mir hasn't set up the gl context in time
[15:01] <greyback> the lightdm thing is weird, I don't understand why you can see the app in 1 frame. qt should be only thing drawing that surface
[15:04] <dandrader> greyback, very weird indeed
[15:07] <tsdgeos> elopio: do you know who can i bug about autopilot? i'm seeing stuff in screen that autopilot vis is not
[15:09] <tsdgeos> or anyone for that matter :D
[15:10] <greyback> tsdgeos: veebers or thomi maybe, neither about tho
[15:12] <tsdgeos> :/
[15:14] <tsdgeos> i can try doing some ad-hoc debugging
[15:14] <tsdgeos> but it ain't gonna work :D
[15:18] <elopio> tsdgeos: cgoldberg on #ubuntu-autopilot
[15:18] <elopio> veebers and thomi are already getting drunk, they live in the future and it's weekend there.
[16:57] <Cimi> tsdgeos, enjoy weekend then :)
[16:57] <Cimi> tsdgeos, chat you monday
[18:09]  * greyback eow
[18:20] <dandrader> mzanetti, still there?
[19:33] <mhall119> Trevinho: do you know where the Unity defaults are defined? And how can I make a separate set of defaults for a separate non-Ubuntu session that uses Unity?
[19:39] <Trevinho> mhall119: there are definitions in the compiz-gnome package
[19:39] <Trevinho> mhall119: for most of settings...
[19:39] <Trevinho> mhall119: for the one on ccsm you can do a new compiz profile
[19:40] <Trevinho> for the "pure" gsettings one you probably need to use migration scripts to define the ones you want based on the session type
[19:40] <Trevinho> if there are no smarter ways using gsettings (that I never looked too in the deep)
[19:41]  * Trevinho about to leave