=== Pici is now known as Guest19876
=== Azelphur_ is now known as Azelphur
=== Pici is now known as Guest83630
=== Guest83630 is now known as Pici
[12:59] <newcomer> hi every1 im having a dillema about my setup , using it last 12months
[13:01] <cfhowlett> !details|newcomer,
[13:01] <ubottu> newcomer,: Please give us full details. For example: "I have a problem with ..., I'm running Ubuntu version .... When I try to do ..., I get the following output: ..., but I expected it to do ..."
[13:01] <newcomer> trying how to type less and explain more :) 1sec
[13:02] <newcomer> excuse me for any typing mistakes from rusty english plz
[13:02] <cfhowlett> newcomer, no worries
[13:04] <newcomer> can hdd encryption be bad for latencies or anything if i want to use it as main serious studio-like audio recording ? ive already learnt using ardour last months , jack is a bit messy in my head , but hey it works fine
[13:04] <newcomer> but was wondering doing a more serious project with higher samplerates and effects and wondered about the hdd encryption on my system
[13:04] <newcomer> if it could interfere in a wrong way to my project
[13:06] <newcomer> a format and a fresh re-install of the system wouldnt mind me without the hdd encryption if thats whats needed
[13:07] <newcomer> id like also ur opinion , for mixing many huge waves , would it be better if i spread them along different hdd's instead of having 1 dedicated for them ?
[13:08] <cfhowlett> newcomer, no expert but I'd be surprised if measurable latency resulted from encryption
[13:08] <newcomer> im only recording 2mono channels through profire 610 firewire , works fine in 44100 havent tried 96000 i wanna use on this project
[13:08] <newcomer> i see
[13:14] <newcomer> i asked in ardour channel also
[13:14] <newcomer> they arent happy with hdd encryption :/
[13:15] <cfhowlett> newcomer, based on ...?
[13:16] <cfhowlett> newcomer, as far as mixing waves - sorry.  I've only ever mixed with Audacity
[13:16] <zequence> Might take longer time to write, but that's just a theoretical maybe from my side
[13:16] <zequence> well, both reading and writing
[13:17] <zequence> newcomer: is it your home folder that is encrypted, only?
[13:17] <zequence> If yes, then you can create a new folder in the root directory, and give yourself rights
[13:17] <zequence> sudo mkdir /audio && sudo chown -R $USER:$USER /audio
[13:17] <cfhowlett> zequence, I've experienced measurable delay on login and logout, but not during saves ...   Of course, I've not actually tested this.
[13:18] <zequence> I don't think the difference is huge, if there is one
[13:18] <zequence> The data is probably scrambled in some way. I really don't know much about encryption on lower level
[13:19] <zequence> newcomer: So, if it's only /home that is encrypted, you can then create a symbolic link from /audio to your home folder, and it will seem like the folder is in your home folder
[13:19] <zequence> ln -s /audio /home/$USER/audio
[13:21] <zequence> Well, according to las in the #ardour channel, there's no delay, but the data takes up more space
[13:22] <zequence> but, that in itself should add some processing time anyway
[13:22] <zequence> for reading/writing, that is, not for fx or anything like that
[13:34] <newcomer> yea
[13:34] <newcomer> im fine
[13:34] <newcomer> no need to change anything :D
[13:34] <newcomer> thanx for the help guyz
[13:35] <newcomer> take care :)
[16:11] <Munger> CAn somebody please help me to get LADI working? I can't seem to get it to start JACK
[16:11] <Munger> (using gladish)
[16:15] <Munger> Log says 'ERROR: `default' server already active' but I stopped JACk in qjackctl
[16:25] <holstein> guess that got sorted out from the error message