| Saviq | mornin' | 08:33 |
|---|---|---|
| Saviq | what did I miss? ;) | 08:33 |
| Zhenech | [GitHub] Subscribed to credativ/puppet-anysyncd notifications | 08:36 |
| Zhenech | ups | 08:36 |
| mhr3 | Mirv, btw do you have mediascanner2 in the qt5.2 transition? we added a qml plugin to it very recently, so it probably needs rebuild | 08:45 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: not much i'd say | 08:45 |
| Saviq | mhr3, does it use private headers? if not - it should not need rebuilding | 08:46 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, cool beanz | 08:46 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: i don't think what Thomi says makes any sense, or at least any sense for my problem | 08:47 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: so i guess all i have left is debug this stuff myself? | 08:47 |
| mhr3 | Saviq, no, but doesn't it need to relink against the core5a binary? | 08:47 |
| Saviq | mhr3, ah, right, damn ABI break | 08:47 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, so you think your issue is not what I described? | 08:48 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: you say objectName evaluation is "not taken into account" or something | 08:49 |
| tsdgeos | i say "the object is simply not there" | 08:49 |
| tsdgeos | or not updated at all | 08:49 |
| tsdgeos | i can scroll a list and autopilot vis will still show the old children | 08:49 |
| tsdgeos | even after restarting autopilot vis | 08:49 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, I might not have read into your email properly | 08:50 |
| tsdgeos | well i did not add that extra info (the objects not updating) | 08:50 |
| tsdgeos | but still it can't be waht you say | 08:50 |
| tsdgeos | since i have | 08:50 |
| tsdgeos | objectName: foo + index | 08:51 |
| tsdgeos | and all children names are | 08:51 |
| tsdgeos | fooNumber | 08:51 |
| tsdgeos | and the index is not really changed there | 08:51 |
| tsdgeos | so all items have the evaluation | 08:51 |
| tsdgeos | just one at least is missing | 08:51 |
| tsdgeos | of course it still could be something similar to what you say but i don't think it may be the easiest explanation | 08:52 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, what I was saying (the problem we encountered) was that ap managed to select a object0 before it became object1 after the binding got updated | 08:53 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: right, but how can that cause object0 not existing at all? | 08:54 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, sure, it can't | 08:55 |
| tsdgeos | and that's what i'm seeing | 08:55 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, so yeah, as I said I might not have read your email properly - was Sunday evening after all ;D | 08:56 |
| tsdgeos | sure :-) | 08:56 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, so yeah, please reply to my email saying I'm full of shit | 08:57 |
| Saviq | oh yay, no WiFi after flashing... | 08:57 |
| Mirv | mhr3: incidentally, I found out about mediascanner2 on Friday and I've just built it | 08:58 |
| mhr3 | Mirv, very well | 08:59 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: so back to my question, do you have any clue how/where to start debugging that? | 08:59 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, /me looks | 09:01 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: ah, and we discovered some compiz regression that made some tests fail | 09:09 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/vjog_compiz_workaround | 09:09 |
| tsdgeos | basically it's not obeying window sizing sometimes | 09:09 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, hmm after applying the patch on top of new-scopes-cleanup it doesn't seem to unlock the screen even... does it work for you? | 09:11 |
| tsdgeos | it was defenitely working on friday | 09:12 |
| tsdgeos | yeah works today too | 09:13 |
| tsdgeos | http://paste.ubuntu.com/7066602/ | 09:13 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: i'm doing this with 5.0 though | 09:14 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, I'm on 5.0 currently, too | 09:15 |
| tsdgeos | ok | 09:15 |
| tsdgeos | and you get stuck on greeter when rnning autopilot? | 09:15 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, yes | 09:17 |
| tsdgeos | try again? :D | 09:17 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, looks like it's looking for the home scope and fails | 09:17 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: are you up to date? | 09:17 |
| tsdgeos | or maybe i didn't push | 09:17 |
| tsdgeos | that can very well be | 09:17 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, did you have any luck with autopilot? | 09:17 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, ah, actually it didn't switch to apps scope on startup | 09:18 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, s/didn't/doesn't/ | 09:18 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: well, i thinking i have found an autopilot bug, proving it is hard though | 09:18 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: did you manage to get past the "everything fails" point? | 09:18 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: nothing left for pushing here | 09:19 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, I stop when you told me you were dealing wih it :) | 09:19 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: ok | 09:19 |
| Cimi | I can try again now | 09:19 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, yeah, the "switch to apps on startup" seems somewhat flaky :/ | 09:19 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, just read your mail | 09:20 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: weird, never had that problem on friday | 09:21 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, when did this dashcategory error start? | 09:21 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: i have no clue | 09:21 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, it's a new scopes error or also in trunk? | 09:21 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: the test works in trunk but the whole QML tree is different, so that proves nothing | 09:26 |
| Saviq | biab | 09:48 |
| om26er | tsdgeos, are you taking new-scopes introduced regressions as bugs or should I wait for it to first land in trunk ? | 09:56 |
| tsdgeos | om26er: if it is indeed a regression/bug, sure | 09:57 |
| om26er | sure, the scrolling in the Apps scope have apparently become much jerky on my mako -- will report in lp. | 09:58 |
| === pete-woods is now known as pete-woods-afk | ||
| Cimi | tsdgeos, ok they fail for trunk here as well | 11:17 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, on a different machine | 11:17 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, I have this QQuickLoader.isCurrent failed error | 11:17 |
| tsdgeos | no idea : | 11:18 |
| tsdgeos | you'll have to try to dig more yourself | 11:18 |
| tsdgeos | otoh it should not be that hard for us to run the autopilot tests | 11:18 |
| Cimi | yeah :( | 11:18 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, are you trying to | 11:36 |
| Cimi | understand as well? | 11:36 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: no, it works for me, i'm fixing the tests in new-scopes that don't work because of the code changes | 11:36 |
| Cimi | @unity who else has issues with autopilot run unity8 ? | 11:37 |
| * mzanetti has *always* issues with AP :D | 11:37 | |
| Cimi | mzanetti, can you run | 11:37 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: I fiddled a while with it last week and got it to run eventually | 11:37 |
| Cimi | autopilot run unity8 > log | 11:37 |
| * mzanetti tries | 11:38 | |
| Cimi | then a nice grep FAIL log | pastebinit :) | 11:38 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: anything you're interested in particular? | 11:44 |
| mzanetti | Cimi: I don't want to run all of them now because they either fail or It'll mess up my desktop if I kill my notification system | 11:44 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, Cimi, the QQuickLoader.isCurrent thing, AFAICT, is dash not switching to Apps on startup | 11:50 |
| Cimi | I'm replying to a mail, will be back soon :) | 11:51 |
| Cimi | and reply to you :) | 11:51 |
| Cimi | Saviq, so we have a fix for that | 12:05 |
| Cimi | ? | 12:05 |
| === MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
| Saviq | Cimi, no, that's something I found just today with tsdgeos's cleanup branch | 12:21 |
| Cimi | Saviq, weird | 12:21 |
| Cimi | Saviq, I have that bug with trunk | 12:21 |
| Cimi | ;) | 12:21 |
| Saviq | Cimi, well, if you're going "autopilot run unity8", you're not actually running trunk most probably, but the system-wide installed version | 12:22 |
| Saviq | Cimi, you need `make -C install`, `PYTHONPATH=tests/autopilot autopilot run unity8` to run the local build | 12:22 |
| Saviq | always check out what autopilot says ni "loading tests from..." | 12:23 |
| Saviq | in | 12:23 |
| Cimi | Saviq, oh!! | 12:24 |
| Cimi | Saviq, ok, nevermind :D | 12:24 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
| tsdgeos | Saviq: actually now i'm having a problem with the correct scope not being loaded, it's sad, isCurrent is true, but it's not really the current one, having a look | 12:54 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: when you have some time, could you please review the packaging changes in here and related branches? https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity-api/new-screenshot-and-focusing-api/+merge/199810 | 13:10 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: sure, will do in ~20, that's ok? | 13:11 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: not urgent at all | 13:11 |
| didrocks | ok ;) | 13:11 |
| === MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow | ||
| didrocks | mzanetti: hum, where are your packaging change? :) | 13:43 |
| didrocks | or the diff isn't correct? | 13:43 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: well, it's only bumping unity-application-iml version | 13:46 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: ah ok, that part that we marshmall | 13:47 |
| mzanetti | didrocks: and the others bump their "Provides" and "Requires" accordingly | 13:47 |
| mzanetti | so yeah, that's the question. is that enough? | 13:47 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: yeah, that's perfect :) | 13:47 |
| mzanetti | nice, thanks | 13:47 |
| didrocks | mzanetti: yw, commented (to +1) | 13:48 |
| mzanetti | purrfect | 13:48 |
| mzanetti | greyback: jfi ^ | 13:48 |
| greyback | mzanetti: ack from me so | 13:48 |
| === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
| kgunn | mhall119: mornin', hey i put in for 2 sessions at uds...and they're still in "proposed" can you help get them on the calednar? | 14:00 |
| kgunn | http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1403/kgunn72/meetings | 14:00 |
| mhall119 | kgunn: what track? | 14:13 |
| mhall119 | kgunn: you need to get a track lead to approve it and schedule it | 14:13 |
| mhall119 | track leads are listed here: http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1403/tracks | 14:13 |
| kgunn | mhall119: thanks | 14:15 |
| MacSlow | mterry, did you have better luck with the newer version of the egl-spinner or didn't you try yet? | 14:20 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I didn't try yet... Let me do that | 14:20 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: is there something I can do to help with the autopilot updates? | 14:20 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: i'm on it, just need some more time to debug some stuff | 14:21 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: ok, let me know if you need a hand. | 14:21 |
| MacSlow | mterry, vanvugt tried it earlier today on his mako too and it worked there too. | 14:21 |
| tsdgeos | tx | 14:21 |
| mterry | MacSlow, hrm | 14:22 |
| MacSlow | mterry, I hope you'll have better luck this time around | 14:22 |
| MacSlow | mterry, when it crashes again a backtrace would be helpful if you can get one | 14:22 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I did find where it crashed... But will see if it happens again | 14:23 |
| mterry | MacSlow, works like a charm :) | 14:23 |
| MacSlow | mterry, rev7 with the text-rendering?! | 14:24 |
| mterry | MacSlow, yup. might as well merge that into the shared USC branch then | 14:24 |
| MacSlow | mterry, awesome! | 14:24 |
| mterry | MacSlow, has Christina seen this yet / had a chance to comment? | 14:24 |
| mterry | MacSlow, I know she was OK with the general idea, but curious about details | 14:25 |
| MacSlow | mterry, I cc'ed here in the last email (~30 minutes ago) which has a link to the latest video... so I hope she'll reply with some feedback | 14:25 |
| mterry | cool | 14:25 |
| MacSlow | mterry, from my side it basically just cleaning up the code and making it nicer to maintain... so I would (after that) hand off to you and trun back to notification-duties. | 14:26 |
| mterry | MacSlow, sure | 14:27 |
| MacSlow | mterry, although I _love_ GL! :) | 14:27 |
| mterry | :) | 14:27 |
| mterry | MacSlow, well if Christina wants changes you can dive back into it :) | 14:27 |
| MacSlow | mterry, I take any excuse to do that :) | 14:28 |
| MacSlow | kgunn, you didn't read that *waves.hands* ;) | 14:28 |
| greyback | kgunn: in "alsamixer", if you hit F5, there's a "mic boost" option, maybe you can turn it down? | 14:33 |
| Cimi | mhr3, dednick btw, tomorrow we can meet 1pm in front of brixton tube station | 14:34 |
| dednick | Cimi: ok. cool | 14:35 |
| mhr3 | Cimi, ok | 14:39 |
| Cimi | kgunn, if you want to stay in mumble, maybe we can try different settings, or later when you have time | 14:42 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, Saviq | 14:44 |
| Cimi | cimi@vostro:~/Development/unity8/new-scopes-cleanup/builddir$ grep -B 3 FAIL LOG | pastebinit | 14:44 |
| Cimi | http://paste.ubuntu.com/7067998/ | 14:44 |
| tsdgeos | thats' bad | 14:45 |
| tsdgeos | stuff like test_passphrase_screen_wrong_password should be passing | 14:45 |
| Saviq | yeah, something weird with shift, too - "FFFFFf" instead of "FFFFFF" | 14:45 |
| tsdgeos | i'm down to http://paste.ubuntu.com/7068005/ failing | 14:46 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, some context? | 14:46 |
| Cimi | grep -B3 ? | 14:46 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: what do you mean some context? | 14:46 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, apart the error | 14:47 |
| Cimi | sorry | 14:47 |
| Cimi | the name of the failing test | 14:47 |
| Cimi | tsdgeos, I run tests with > log | 14:47 |
| tsdgeos | Cimi: they fail because they are checking toatlly wrong stuff | 14:47 |
| Cimi | then I grep -B3 FAIL log | 14:47 |
| * greyback needs to run to bank, bbiab | 14:49 | |
| mzanetti | dandrader: so, this Model of apps, that's still the ApplicationManager, right? | 14:49 |
| kgunn | Cimi: i got about 10 min...wanna try real quick | 14:51 |
| kgunn | mumble | 14:51 |
| tsdgeos | and actually the 4 are basically the same | 14:52 |
| tsdgeos | the preview opening doesn't work | 14:52 |
| tsdgeos | because we changed the way preview opening works | 14:52 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, no, it's a simple ListModel of qml items | 14:52 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, it's a list model of MirSurfaceItems (qquick items holding mir surface gl textures) | 14:52 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, then ListView has a Window.qml delegate that takes a suface and reparent it to itself | 14:52 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: ah, but shouldnt the MirSurfaceItems be the Delegates? | 14:53 |
| mzanetti | and the model still hold ApplicationInfo objects? | 14:53 |
| mhr3 | Cimi, l4d or l4d2? :) | 14:53 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: at least that's what I though of when doing the right edge | 14:54 |
| Cimi | mhr3, l4d2 | 14:54 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: so all we'd need to do in that case would be to replace "Image" with "MirSurfaceItem" in the SpreadDelegate.qml | 14:54 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, no, MirSurfaceItems are created from the qpa/cpp/appMan side. it essentially wraps a gl texture that's bound to a mir (EGL) surface | 14:54 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, so that the qml side can manipulate that texture as a QQuickItem fairly easily, | 14:55 |
| mzanetti | ok... so the ApplicationInfo objects will become MirSurfaceItems? | 14:55 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, no, they're are still there | 14:55 |
| mzanetti | but then we have 2 models | 14:55 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, yes | 14:56 |
| mzanetti | ok... I think I understand | 14:56 |
| mzanetti | but is that really way to go? | 14:56 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, the concept of an application is one thing, more abstract, a client surface is another one | 14:56 |
| mzanetti | yeah. | 14:57 |
| mzanetti | that's why I said, the MirSurfaceItems should be the delegates | 14:57 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, and stage wants to arrange an shuffle around surfaces/client windows | 14:57 |
| mzanetti | but the stage still needs to represent all running apps | 14:57 |
| mzanetti | and not some other model of surfaces | 14:58 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: so we can't create such MirSurfaceItems in QML as we like? | 14:58 |
| mzanetti | for example, one in the app-spread, one in the runningappsgrid etc | 14:58 |
| mzanetti | but still showing the same surface | 14:59 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, at the moment no. mir tells the QPA that there's new surface and then QPA creates a MirSurfaceItem that makes use of it, so that the mir surface can be used by the QML scene | 15:03 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, then QPA informs the QML side that there's a new MirSurfaceItem available | 15:03 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, QML side (unity8) then reparents it to the view delegate to have it on the scene | 15:04 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: what I mean is this: I'm ok if we need to create such MirSurfaceItems somewhere in C++, but I don't think we should only have that model available in qml... Can't we wrap that somehow? So that I can just say this in QML: | 15:04 |
| mzanetti | AppSurface { appId: "foobar" } | 15:04 |
| mzanetti | and that then just finds its MirSurfaceItem somehow and paints its contents in the AppSurface {} item | 15:05 |
| mzanetti | so we can still do things like: | 15:05 |
| mzanetti | ListView { model: ApplicationManager; delegate: AppSurface { appId: model.appId } } | 15:05 |
| mzanetti | otherwise this sounds like a hugely complex thing to me to match surfaces with apps in QML all over the place | 15:06 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, I think it would be good if you checked out the current stage code to get an idea on how that all fits together | 15:07 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: what is the current stage code? | 15:08 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, lp:~unity-team/unity8/mirCompositor | 15:08 |
| mzanetti | ok. I'll check it out | 15:08 |
| dandrader | mzanetti, also an application can have many surfaces (on the desktop at least) | 15:10 |
| mzanetti | dandrader: true... but that doesn't really invalidate my point | 15:10 |
| dandrader | just something to keep in mind | 15:11 |
| mzanetti | yeah, sure | 15:11 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
| === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
| greyback | someone do me a favour please: run "xev | grep -A 3 KeyRelease" and hit SysReq | 15:51 |
| Zhenech | greyback, http://paste.debian.net/86897/ | 15:53 |
| greyback | Zhenech: perfect, thank you | 15:53 |
| Zhenech | it's a thinkpad, so I actually pressed Fn+PrtSc if that matters | 15:54 |
| * greyback has almost managed to remap his macbook's eject key to sysreq | 15:54 | |
| greyback | Zhenech: I've a macbook, no such key so playing with remapping | 15:55 |
| greyback | I've mapped eject to printscreen, which is close :) | 15:55 |
| Zhenech | post it on the web, newer thinkpads miss that one too | 15:55 |
| greyback | will do | 15:55 |
| tsdgeos | eean: is it ok for you if i kill the get_details autopilot tests? they don't do much, do they? | 15:57 |
| tsdgeos | what? | 15:57 |
| tsdgeos | eean: sorry | 15:57 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: read ↑↑↑↑ | 15:57 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: I need that to check the application details shown on the click scope | 16:03 |
| elopio | if you remove the test, I might break the helper without noticing | 16:03 |
| tsdgeos | ?¿ | 16:03 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: ↑↑ | 16:06 |
| tsdgeos | not sure i understand what you men | 16:06 |
| tsdgeos | mean | 16:06 |
| MacSlow | mterry, pushed rev8 of the egl-spinner, which should be easier to read and alter. Until we get feedback from Design, I'll leave it as-is. If you run into any issues just ping me. | 16:07 |
| mterry | MacSlow, thank you! | 16:08 |
| MacSlow | mterry, yw | 16:08 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: I mean that if something changes on unity and get_details doesn't return what I expect it to return | 16:16 |
| elopio | then the click scope tests will start failing without a clear reason | 16:16 |
| elopio | why do you want to remove them? | 16:16 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: because i don't see the point | 16:17 |
| tsdgeos | i mean it's not testing anything else than "we're showing stuff on screen" | 16:18 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: it's testing that get_helpers returns the title, the subtitle and the description. | 16:19 |
| elopio | the real user tests is in the click scope, where we check that the title, subtitle and description match the ones of the application we are opening. | 16:19 |
| elopio | but lets say we remove this test in unity. | 16:19 |
| elopio | and for some reason, unity no longer shows the description anymore. | 16:20 |
| elopio | without the test, we are with no clue about how it will affect other tests that might be using the helper. | 16:20 |
| tsdgeos | ah | 16:22 |
| tsdgeos | so you're using that helper from somewhere else?¿? | 16:23 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: ↑ ? | 16:23 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: yes. On the unity-scope-click suite. | 16:24 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: all the things you will see with tests in test_emulators.py are because I'm using them somewhere else. | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: well | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | that sucks | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | i mean i suck probably :D | 16:24 |
| elopio | they are not user tests, just to make sure that the helpers remain working. | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | is that documented? | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | because i had no idea | 16:24 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: maybe it's better you fix those tests then | 16:25 |
| tsdgeos | those = unity8 | 16:25 |
| tsdgeos | because i'm not going to go over unity-scope-click suite and fix them to work with new-scopes | 16:25 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: yes, mzanetti told me to add a big comment on test_emulators.py explaining it. | 16:25 |
| elopio | it's after the copyright. | 16:25 |
| mzanetti | poor elopio... first needed to convince mzanetti and now tsdgeos :D | 16:26 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: you won't need to go over unity-scope-click suite as long as you keep the signatures of the helpers. | 16:26 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: i can't keep the signature of the helpers | 16:26 |
| tsdgeos | because everything has changed in previews | 16:26 |
| tsdgeos | it's a different world | 16:26 |
| elopio | and if you have to break a signature, then you talk to the devs of the scope tests, and coordinate with them the updates. | 16:26 |
| tsdgeos | right | 16:26 |
| elopio | in this case, I'm the dev of the scope tests :) | 16:26 |
| tsdgeos | i don't want to do that | 16:26 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, don't want to do what? | 16:27 |
| tsdgeos | be a good citizen | 16:27 |
| Saviq | ;) | 16:27 |
| tsdgeos | feeling moody today | 16:27 |
| tsdgeos | sorry | 16:27 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, those helpers are ours, we need to commit to them, and yeah try and maintain the signatures, but obviously in this case we'll need to break them | 16:28 |
| Saviq | click scope tests will need to be redone just as well | 16:28 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: I'm here to help with whatever you need. | 16:28 |
| elopio | I'm used to moody devs, don't worry ;) | 16:28 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: well basically | 16:29 |
| tsdgeos | the get_details thing doesn't apply anymore | 16:29 |
| tsdgeos | since you can have a random number of stuff in a preview | 16:29 |
| tsdgeos | there is not just one title | 16:30 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: what I suppose we should do is to make it specific for the application preview. | 16:30 |
| tsdgeos | you can have 10 of them | 16:30 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: the application preview will still return title, subtitle and description, right? | 16:30 |
| Saviq | elopio, I don't think so, that knowledge needs to move towards the click apps scope | 16:30 |
| tsdgeos | the application preview doesn't exist in our autopilot world | 16:30 |
| Saviq | elopio, it's the scope that decides what will be displayed, we have no control over it, effectively | 16:30 |
| tsdgeos | is just a preview the same it was | 16:30 |
| tsdgeos | that sentence made no sense | 16:31 |
| tsdgeos | is just a preview as the others | 16:31 |
| tsdgeos | so that's why i want to remove the whole get_details thing | 16:31 |
| elopio | tsdgeos, Saviq: yes, so we need to move this get_details to the autopilot helpers that live in unity-scope-click | 16:31 |
| tsdgeos | i don't think it makes sense | 16:31 |
| Saviq | tsdgeos, and we need to facilitate that ↑↑ | 16:31 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: then, I agree with you that it needs to be removed. | 16:31 |
| elopio | just, we need to be in sync so the tests in unity-scope-click are broken just for a little time. | 16:32 |
| Saviq | elopio, or not at all, we can land them together with new-scopes | 16:32 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: remove the helper, remove the test, and when we have all the other helpers working, I will prepare a branch for the scope. | 16:32 |
| tsdgeos | elopio: cool thanks | 16:32 |
| elopio | tsdgeos: thanks to you. | 16:33 |
| tsdgeos | Saviq: elopio: i just pushed something that makes the last tests i had written down as not passing pass again, hopefully it should not regress the rest of the tests | 17:04 |
| tsdgeos | will check first thing tomorrow in the morning | 17:04 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|lunch | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| === dandrader|lunch is now known as dandrader | ||
| Saviq | mzanetti, hey, tried hi-dpi Unity7? worth checking out probably :) | 19:34 |
| Saviq | mzanetti, it's in the archive already, iiuc | 19:34 |
| bschaefer | Saviq, yup it is, dont open the dash or hud though :) | 19:43 |
| popey | is there an easy way on current build of unity 8 on nexus 7 to get the sidestage, or do I need the bleeding edge stuff shown at MWC? | 19:55 |
| === dandrader is now known as dandrader|bbl | ||
| Saviq | popey, no, no easy way, and it won't be enabled soon either, it was using a hack to rotate the shell, which we need to replace with a proper implementation | 20:42 |
| popey | Saviq: thought so, thanks | 20:55 |
| === jhodapp_ is now known as jhodapp|brb | ||
| === jhodapp|brb is now known as jhodapp | ||
| kgunn | mhall119: ok...so i got my sessions approved but not scheduled | 22:10 |
| kgunn | http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1403/all/ | 22:10 |
| kgunn | see i'm listed here...but no date/time | 22:10 |
| kgunn | any ideas (day before :) | 22:10 |
| mhall119 | kgunn: still up to the track lead to schedule it | 22:13 |
| kgunn | ug...they've all gone home | 22:13 |
| hitsujiTMO | kgunn: any one i've clicked on has a time | 22:26 |
| hitsujiTMO | ahh, yours is the only one without a time | 22:28 |
| mhr3 | mhall119, do you use your @canonical mail? | 22:35 |
| === dandrader|bbl is now known as dandrader | ||
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| === jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|afk | ||
| mhall119 | mhr3: sometimes, why? | 23:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!