[00:15] Wellark_, on it [00:59] robru, what the status of my landing-008 publish? [00:59] bregma, just looking at that now. [01:00] synchronicity [01:01] bregma, ok looks good to me, just need an ack from a core dev to review the packaging changes (I'm not authorized for that). I pinged cyphermox already [01:02] just keep swimming swimming swimming [01:20] bregma, ok, got RAOF reviewing your diff. he's mentioning that the dependency on libgrail is dropped, is that on purpose? [01:23] robru, unity has not been dependent on grail for a very long time [01:23] bregma, ok cool [01:25] bregma, ok published, packaging acked by RAOF [01:28] brb, phone === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [02:53] bah, longest phonecall ever. [02:53] anybody need anything before I EOD? [02:56] * robru -> EOD [03:45] hm, just created another x86 based image and click hook run-user failed to run [03:46] File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/click/commands/hook.py", line 74, in run [03:46] Click.run_user_hooks(db, user_name=options.user) [03:46] gi._glib.GError: symlink /opt/click.ubuntu.com/.click/users/phablet/.com.ubuntu.calculator.new -> /usr/share/click/preinstalled/com.ubuntu.calculator/0.1.3.224 failed: No such file or directory [03:46] drwxr-xr-x 2 clickpkg clickpkg 4.0K Mar 12 03:35 click.ubuntu.com [03:46] user phablet can't create any file at /opt/click.ubuntu.com/ [03:47] wonder if we'll hit the same issues with the armhf images [04:38] morning, and thanks for doing the process-cpp fix before thomas [04:39] thanks also whoever clicked the unity-mir rebuilds in the Qt PPA :) [04:39] Mirv: yw :-) [05:52] yeah, big regression, bug 1291192 [05:53] bug 1291192 in click (Ubuntu) "click hook run-user fails when booting image 233" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1291192 [06:02] doh [06:14] Mirv, good news. webapps team came to me with a big landing, but I convinced them to wait for after qt5.2, because I would have had to pull 3 or 4 things out of your silo for that ;-) [06:18] good morning :) [06:18] seems like I broke some things. === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [06:29] robru: whoo :) [06:29] Mirv, any idea when qt5.2 will land? [06:30] tvoss: yup, unfortunately :( you'll need to have some sort of script to pull all depenendencies and build them against the dev packages installed from the landing PPA or something similar [06:30] robru: tomorrow, hopefully, if today is decided we can land it tomorrow European time. [06:30] robru: everything is ready except for some hopeful fixes to autopilot tests in a couple of apps [06:30] Mirv, what exactly broke? I know of unity-mir, which rsalveti fixed [06:30] Mirv, good luck! i'm so eager to see that get in. crazy! [06:31] robru: didrocks hopes to have completely smooth Qt 5.2 transition to get back to promoted images as soon as possible [06:31] robru: me too :) [06:32] tvoss: the process-cpp itself broke building I guess most that depends on it (well, I know unity-mir and some other was mentioned). https://launchpadlibrarian.net/169119692/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-amd64.unity-mir_0.3%2B14.04.20140311.3-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [06:32] "fatal error: core/signal.h: No such file or directory" [06:33] tvoss: so the fix was as simple as https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/trusty-changes/2014-March/011596.html [06:33] that's of course something that's not necessarily spotted without using pbuilder or such environment for the testing [06:33] Mirv, why haven't we seen anything of those problems in CI? [06:33] since you might and usually have packages installed that are not strictly dependencies [06:34] Mirv, but in CI as well? [06:34] tvoss: because eg. unity-mir landed before process-cpp, and only when process-cpp landed further rebuilds of the deps like unity-mir became impossible [06:34] tvoss: compiling process-cpp itself had not problems, just packages that use it [06:35] Mirv, okay. but the only build dependency we have right now is unity-mir. and that slipped because we took unity-mir out of the process-cpp landing [06:35] the best would be of course some amount of automatic reverse-dependencies building === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [06:53] tvoss: hey [06:55] tvoss: can you ensure process-cpp has some test cases please? And part of the test cases should be "rebuild all reverse dependencies" as the API isn't stable [06:55] tvoss: we got blocked yesterday on rebuilding the emergency fix for unity-mir due to it [06:55] and rsalveti quickly fixed it (thanks) [06:59] didrocks, not sure what you mean by api not stable? [06:59] tvoss: we couldn't rebuild unity-mir with latest process-cpp [06:59] didrocks, I can surely add a test case to rebuild all reverse depends [06:59] tvoss: so yeah, I guess that will be needed [06:59] mind doing that for next landing? [06:59] didrocks, yup, but that wasn't due to the api but due to a missing dep on the -dev package of process-cpp [06:59] didrocks, I can surely do that [06:59] thanks ;) [07:00] didrocks, do we have a script that automatically pulls and builds all reverse build dependencies? [07:00] tvoss: I don't think we have that [07:04] tvoss: you might want to use "reverse-depends -b" to detect all the package which build-depends on you [07:30] cjwatson: once you are around, can you please have a look at bug #1291192? [07:30] bug 1291192 in click (Ubuntu) "click hook run-user fails when booting image 233" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1291192 [08:03] any ubuntu-core-devs available? [08:03] would need a NEW packaging review to get this MP landed: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-api-team/connectivity-api/ci-testrun/+merge/210511 === Wellark_ is now known as Wellark [08:06] Wellark: hi, usually seb did most of the preNEW reviews for cu2d, so it's probably best to wait for him [08:06] Wellark: the change itself is good, I'm doing a NEW review at the same [08:06] sil2100: seb does? :) [08:06] didrocks: I remembered him doing it, since when you do them then you won't do the MIR for it, right? ;) [08:07] sil2100: yeah, but I still NEWED 90% of them… [08:07] didrocks: true...! Bad wording on my side! [08:07] Wellark: as we try to standardize the packaging, can you move the "Section" stenza just after Priority please? (nitpick) [08:08] in debian/control [08:08] * sil2100 just remembers poking seb a lot with those because didrocks told him so ;p [08:09] Wellark: you're forcing gcc 4.7 because of properties-cpp? :) [08:09] Wellark: not sure why are you depending on libdbus-1-dev, shouldn't libdbus-cpp-dev brings it in? (and you only use the cpp bindings, right?) [08:10] Wellark: same, to standardize, can you put recommends after depends? [08:11] Wellark: also, on Package: libconnectivity-cpp0 [08:11] no need to repeat the section as it matches the source one [08:11] Wellark: also, please suggest the -doc, not recommends [08:13] Wellark: just a note once you will want to enter main: you will need a symbols file [08:13] so bonus point if you add it now :) [08:14] Wellark: your version should be 0.0.1-0ubuntu1 btw in debian/changelog [08:18] Wellark: your .pc file Requires: dbus-cpp [08:19] so Package: libconnectivity-cpp-dev [08:19] shouldn't dep on libproperties-cpp-dev, but on libdbus-cpp-dev [08:19] (bonus for trailing stenza) [08:19] Wellark: that's it for what I can spot :) [08:19] * didrocks paste the logs on the review [08:22] didrocks: thanks! [08:23] Wellark: yw, keep me posted once the changes are done, I'll just then redo a quick review :) [08:23] didrocks: will do :) [08:23] (and NEW it in the archive, once landed) [08:25] didrocks: could you claim the review from ubuntu-core-dev side and indicate Needs Fixing? [08:25] thanks! [08:26] Wellark: sure, done! === wellark|pingpong is now known as Wellark|pingpong [08:57] didrocks: in-between stuff I started doing packaging reviews of the core-apps that popey poked us about to make them more archive-upload-feasible if you don't mind [08:57] sil2100: sure, nothing on the list… however, I told him it's a complicated one [08:58] and I'm not really supportive to aggravate the problem having them in the archive [08:58] sil2100: he did ask you directly? It's not jason? [08:58] didrocks: I must say I'm always a bit confused when there's clicks and debs for one thing [08:59] sil2100: yeah, and this is getting worse if we continue injecting more apps [08:59] this is what I told him. Also, it's lost time I guess in term of packaging reviews and NEWing [08:59] didrocks: he poked me previously asking 'how to proceed' to get those into the archive, and I got the bugs from him then [08:59] not sure he will find an archive admin + FFe [08:59] Right [08:59] sil2100: interesting, if you don't have anything else to do, sure [09:00] sil2100: but to be clear, this is NOT our priority [09:00] if we have anything else, this one will be [09:00] sil2100, didrocks: what softwares are we talking about? [09:00] seb128: core apps [09:00] in click store [09:00] seems like popey is pushing that we have debs version as well [09:00] (which brings the situation when it's only fixed in one side and not the other and people get confused) [09:01] we said we would have some of them usable on the desktop so they can be worked on/dogfooded for convergence [09:01] but that only a limited set, like gallery (which is already in) [09:01] camera, notes as well I think [09:01] seb128: we do have already have some, right? [09:01] yeah [09:01] Yes, those we had from the beginning [09:01] the ones which were debs before click [09:01] so I guess it's good to keep those [09:01] I think we shouldn't invest out of the limited set we are aiming at putting on the desktop next cycle [09:02] seb128: +1 [09:02] that's what I told popey 2 days ago [09:02] didrocks: if it's not priority then I don't push on those any further [09:02] sil2100: thanks :) btw, there is one thing you can look at if you have time [09:02] sil2100: the unity8 AP tests which continuously fails [09:02] (not due to the crash) [09:02] it's the last one I guess [09:02] http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/232:20140311.2:20140304/7098/unity8/879786/ [09:02] didrocks: sure, what's up? You mean, the unicode problem, or something new [09:02] 'tmp5ics4X' != u'' [09:03] Ah, this one ;) [09:03] sil2100: it's not new, it's there for some images already [09:03] Ok! [09:03] and always failing [09:03] Yeah, I saw it locally as well basically [09:03] as well with Qt 5.2 [09:03] sil2100: yeah, would be good to understand/get that fixed [09:03] if this one is fixed, we expect 5.2 with 100% passing on mako again :) [09:03] didrocks: aye! On it then ;) [09:03] thanks ;) [09:07] sil2100, didrocks, popey: just for the record, that's what we agreed on at previous vUDS for this cycle [09:07] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/client-1404-unity8-on-desktop [09:07] "(3) Enable key core Touch applications for both Unity7 and Unity8 (gallery, notes, camera, browser, calculator)" [09:08] so it seems we are missing calculator [09:08] but it's the only one on the list [09:08] yeah, making sense to add that one if needed, one is fine, but we won't add more [09:08] (it's really costly for work that will be removed) [09:09] hmm, why did we have two image builds with only 10min between them yesterday ? [09:10] * ogra_ will try to get the bot ready by the weekend ... [09:10] ogra_: yeah, not sure… Seems only one was labelled though, right? [09:11] didrocks, yes, only the first one [09:11] and obviously there were no changes between these two [09:12] ogra_: do you know how the labelling works, why the other didn't get one? [09:12] (like the second one) [09:12] system-image was too smart and thought "I don't need that one" :p [09:12] (I doubt about it) [09:13] didrocks, not sure what happened there, but s-i definitely didnt pick it up ... else we would be at 234 [09:13] yep [09:13] it's not like that that we'll arrive soon to #332! [09:13] :) [09:13] ogra_: maybe it's worth digging though [09:13] haha [09:14] in case we'll need one at some point of the future and there is a race [09:14] i'll ask stephane later ... [09:14] thanks [09:14] in that case, it was rather beneficial :) [09:14] will look at the logs, but i doubt i'll find anything [09:14] ok, keep me posted please :) [09:15] didrocks, seb128: hah! ANd I just made a packaging review for calculator ;p [09:15] might be that he did some maintenance work and disabled the cron job or so [09:15] (that was the one click-core-app I finished doing) [09:15] maybe [09:15] sil2100, good ;-) let me know if you need NEW review [09:15] ogra_: would be good to be warned (even afterwards) in that case [09:15] ah great sil2100 :) [09:15] seb128: sure ;) Will take care of that later and poke you then [09:15] cool [09:15] The merge still isn't reviewed [09:18] hmm, intresting, so you cant start click apps on 233 (according to rsalveti) but all tests seem to work [09:19] ogra_: you can't install click apps [09:19] isn't it? [09:19] a new installed one [09:19] (I was updating) [09:19] btw, just worked here [09:19] let me try from the store [09:20] ..."It seems we got a critical click regression with 233 (click user hook [09:20] fails to start), making the user unable to launch any click package [09:20] (camera, facebook, twitter, etc)."... [09:20] he said launch [09:20] didrocks: your discussion reminded me, lp:qtcreator-plugin-cmake would enjoy a preNEW review too (I just added missing copyright headers). [09:20] ogra_: hum, he didn't parse it that way, but you're right [09:21] Mirv: ok, I'll try to have a look (second NEW review of my day :p) [09:21] ogra_: yeah, worked here [09:21] oh, click top the daily e.u.c trusty report [09:21] https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/58560a4ce3c2e52baaaa19390dc28579e7f5e8c3 [09:21] didrocks: ok! [09:21] cjwatson, ^ saw that I guess? [09:22] seb128: yeah, that's related to what ricardo told I guess the hook not being refreshed) [09:22] ogra_: I think we'll need a fresh installation to see it [09:22] let me try [09:23] i would, but then i dont have bandwith for the meeting :P [09:23] * ogra_ gets some fresh coffee [09:23] ogra_: I'm getting it [09:24] ahah, I was starting to blame ogra on "can't push to the image" [09:24] then adb shell was failing [09:24] and finally I noticed the cable was unplugged :p [09:29] heh [09:31] so after OTA I have no issues on my flo [09:32] ogra_: coming? [09:57] didrocks, so, could we get a silo for all the new-scopes related stuff? === vila changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | Vanguard: vila | CITrain support - US: robru, cyphermox, rsalveti - EU: sil2100, Mirv, didrocks | CITrain support no answer: use mup bot after 30 minutes, but choose right timezone | Landing instructions: http://goo.gl/8H1Du3. Landing in degraded mode (see http://goo.gl/J1EqPW) [09:57] mhr3: sure, what line? [09:58] didrocks, 21 [09:58] mhr3: shouldn't you have some unity8 as well? [09:58] it's there [09:58] I can't read then :p [09:58] last mp [09:58] ah indeed [09:58] I can read then [09:59] mhr3: ok, remember blablabla, not before 5.2, blablabla, you will have to rebuild and retest, blablabla [09:59] the warnings you had yesterday :p [09:59] didrocks, right, right [09:59] sign here with "I accept…" -> [ ] [10:00] I'm aware of limitations. [ mhr3 ] [10:00] \o/ [10:00] * didrocks uses his new shiny option then! [10:00] so... hell about to break loose? [10:00] :) [10:00] heh ;) [10:01] mhr3: btw, as well ERROR:root:unity-scope-mediascanner is already prepared for the same serie and destination in landing-002 [10:01] in addition to the Qt one [10:02] hm, ok, no biggie [10:02] WARNING:root:One or more projects are already in use for the same destination and series in another silo (see above). However, the ignore flag was set. Please inform both silos owners directly. [10:02] mhr3: and so, silo 003! [10:03] ogra_: davmor2: ok, bootstrapping done [10:03] I can launch click packages without network [10:03] * didrocks adds wifi now :p [10:06] ogra_: davmor2: installed calculator and launched -> works here [10:06] however, I have the click crash as well [10:06] gi._glib.GError: symlink /opt/click.ubuntu.com/.click/users/phablet/.com.ubuntu.calculator.new -> /usr/share/click/preinstalled/com.ubuntu.calculator/0.1.3.224 failed: No such file or directory [10:07] so, something to look at anyway [10:10] * didrocks will go away for a run [10:10] ogra_: davmor2: sil2100: do you mind following up with Colin if he's coming in between? ^ [10:10] sure [10:10] thx! [10:11] davmor2: no need to bootstrap for you then I guess [10:17] didrocks: please see my comments in https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-api-team/connectivity-api/ci-testrun/+merge/210511 === vrruiz_ is now known as rvr [10:18] didrocks: ok ;) [10:19] Wellark|pingpong: bonus point with trailing comma on latest depends, and suggests please (to avoid noisy diff in the future). However if you don't require properties-cpp in your .cp file, you shouldn't add it as a -dev depends, fix either the .pc file or the dependency :) [10:20] Wellark|pingpong: all the rest is fine :) [10:20] Wellark|pingpong: just reping me once those changes are done [10:20] who ever is building against my library also needs properties-cpp [10:20] it's a header only lib [10:20] so it must be in -dev Depends [10:20] Wellark|pingpong: so you need your .pc to Requires it [10:21] it does not have .pc [10:21] oh? [10:21] * didrocks wonders why [10:21] why should it have? [10:21] as it does not install eny libs nor link against anything [10:21] Wellark|pingpong: properties-cpp.pc [10:21] I see one [10:22] didrocks: yikes, sorry [10:22] /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/properties-cpp.pc [10:22] Wellark|pingpong: why don't you see it? ^ [10:23] cjwatson: no worry, still weird that we can't reproduce ricardo's issue though [10:23] didrocks: oh. [10:23] interesting [10:23] cjwatson: but yeah, that and the crash fix, I think sil2100 can help assigning a silo if you have that before I come back [10:23] that must be a new one :) [10:23] didrocks: ok. adding it. [10:24] Wellark|pingpong: thanks :) [10:24] didrocks: that could just be ensuredir failing for the same reason but the error being eaten for some reason; I suspect it's uninteresting [10:24] Wellark|pingpong: will be back in ~1h15 [10:24] (ricardo's issue) [10:24] didrocks: although all it does is -I/usr/lib/include :) [10:24] cjwatson: ah, ok :) [10:24] */usr/include [10:24] Wellark|pingpong: yeah, but being future-proof while we spot it! [10:24] true. [10:25] * didrocks really away now [10:25] didrocks: I'm still in morning mode with children chattering to me, playing games, etc. though, so give me a bit of slack on this one please [10:25] cjwatson, well, seems only rsalveti can reproduce it ... we all tried, so it doesnt seem to hit everyone equally [10:25] cjwatson: sure, no worry, if we can start/have an image built before vUDS starts, it's fine (I don't expect to see a lot of landings happening right now) [10:26] ;) [10:26] wohoo [10:27] Now that was weird [10:28] why ? [10:28] ogra_: I'm sure it depends whether you previously had any apps unpacked at all [10:28] cjwatson, well, i tried with OTA on an image that has a lot of clicks installed [10:29] and didier did y fresh bootstrap install [10:29] s/y/a/ [10:30] it looks like it would happen if /opt/click.ubuntu.com/.click/ didn't previously exist [10:31] didrocks, can you reconf row21? had to remove some mps [10:32] apparently bzr is being stupid [10:36] mhr3: I can reconfigure [10:39] didrocks: all done. [10:40] sil2100, k, thx [10:41] mhr3: done [10:41] ogra_: I've reproduced an identical error with a new test, anyway [10:41] ah, great [10:41] even if I don't have a recipe for triggering it on the phone [10:52] sil2100: please can you assign a silo for https://code.launchpad.net/~click-hackers/click/trunk/+merge/210579 ? [10:52] sil2100: oops, wait a sec [10:53] cjwatson: sure, waiting ;) [10:53] you always spot the buglet when proofreading the MP diff, right ... [10:54] sil2100: OK, better now (was just a performance bug) [10:54] cjwatson: the same merge, yes? [10:54] yep [10:58] cjwatson: silo 004 assigned for your merge -> the merge itself looks strange, as it's proposing lp:click to some other branch, but I don't know the structure of the click project and believe that you know what you're doing ;) [10:59] cjwatson: do you have the required permissions to press the 'build' button in silos? [10:59] cjwatson: or you want me to do it for you? [10:59] yes [10:59] I mean yes I have perms I think [11:00] Awesome ;) Then just proceed to landing-004 and you can build - if there's a change in the merge itself, you only have to press 'build' and mention click as the project name to rebuild [11:01] yep. I have to go for a bit too, I emergency-dumped childcare on Kirsten [11:07] Sure, thanks for the fix! [11:09] rsalveti: FWIW, I think it would have been totally fine to try to wake me by phone for this kind of thing [11:11] cjwatson, well, luckily we have the choice to not promote an image if we find such things ;) so we can easily wait til you are around again [11:12] Yeah, but that puts me in the situation of delaying Qt 5.2 even more [11:12] In context I'd rather be woken :) [11:12] heh, ok [11:13] (i dont see you blocking 5.2 ... we just recently promoted an image, fine if we can get a better one, but not mandatory imho) [11:14] Is 5.2 going to start landing today? [11:14] up to Mirv and didrocks [11:16] BTW the trivial repro recipe for rsalveti's bug is: [11:16] root@ubuntu-phablet:/opt/click.ubuntu.com# mv .click .click-safe [11:16] root@ubuntu-phablet:/opt/click.ubuntu.com# su - phablet [11:16] phablet@ubuntu-phablet:~$ click hook run-user [11:17] you can rm -rf /opt/click.ubuntu.com/.click; mv /opt/click.ubuntu.com/.click{-safe,} afterwards [11:18] no idea why it didn't happen to didrocks on a fresh bootstrap; maybe it wasn't quite fresh enough or something [11:18] oh it sort of did, it's just that he could still launch apps [11:18] meh [11:45] cjwatson: we've a meeting in 1h 15min if you want to join, but in general the remaining blocker (or thing that needs a plan) are the regression in AP tests http://q-jenkins:8080/job/autopilot-release-gatekeeper/69/#showFailuresLink (gallery-app not counting, it needs a rebuild) [11:45] well notes app should be fixed too [11:46] 2 in calendar + music-app, 1 in messaging-app, 4 in unity8 (unless already fixed) [11:57] cjwatson: hum, I'm pretty sure I used the boostrap option (and had to reconfigure all user's config + no click apps installed) [11:57] I suspect that you were able to launch apps because you tried installing one first [11:57] but it's just a guess, *shrug* [11:57] oh possibly [11:57] cjwatson: on 5.2 -> not likely today, but will keep you posted [11:57] current version in landing-004 fails differently, I've rethought things a bit and am going to push another version [11:58] ok :) [12:00] cjwatson: yeah (finished backlogged), I don't think you are blocking 5.2 TBH. I'll ensure it's not used as an excuse if neede :) [12:00] needed* === vila changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | Vanguard: cihelp | CITrain support - US: robru, cyphermox, rsalveti - EU: sil2100, Mirv, didrocks | CITrain support no answer: use mup bot after 30 minutes, but choose right timezone | Landing instructions: http://goo.gl/8H1Du3. Landing in degraded mode (see http://goo.gl/J1EqPW) [12:10] didrocks: so 233 is working fine for me but I'm assuming there is going to be another spin for the click fix right? [12:11] didrocks, Mirv: when are we looking to land Qt 5.2 now anyway I forgot to ask in the hangout (hadn't woken up yet is my excuse :) ) [12:11] davmor2: yeah for 233 [12:11] davmor2: well, when all remaining issues will be fixed [12:12] didrocks: but where's the fun in a green image there is no work for everyone :D [12:13] davmor2: well, we are not green and the fun can happen now on the Qt 5.2 landing slot :p [12:13] didrocks: haha [12:14] davmor2: it depends ^. if the today's AP run can be trusted to the extent that it worked with the click breakage, remaining AP failures could be 2 calendar-app, 2 music-app, 1 unity8 [12:15] I don't believe that the click breakage will have affected AP in the slightest [12:16] It seems very unlikely to me anyway [12:16] cjwatson: well the apps are not starting like http://q-jenkins:8080/job/autopilot-release-gatekeeper/70/label=mako-06/testReport/junit/calendar_app.tests.test_yearview/TestYearView/test_selecting_a_month_switch_to_month_view_with_touch_/ so I assumed it was because of the click [12:16] there might be something else going on with Leo's latest run of course too [12:17] Hm [12:17] Maybe I'm wrong [12:17] on my mako 233 upgraded to qt 5.2 I only have 7 apps listed as installed as a whole, ie no click apps [12:17] uh [12:17] Mirv: I guess you've never installed any apps [12:18] But certainly if you're affected by the "click hook run-user" breakage then ~/.local/share/applications/ symlinks will be missing [12:18] So I guess that could indeed affect AP [12:19] cjwatson: I believe apps like Facebook, Gallery-app etc are preinstalled, and were yesterday still. this is after phablet-flash -b [12:19] Right [12:19] You'll probably find that if you install any random app, and then reboot, the preinstalled apps will appear === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk [12:25] Mirv: it shouldn't impact, or, we'll have exactly the same breakage on the main CI results [12:27] confirmed [12:28] didrocks: was it so that the dashboard results test environment is identical to what Leo is running at the gatekeeper job? anyhow, I was looking at http://q-jenkins:8080/job/autopilot-release-gatekeeper/70/#showFailuresLink [12:29] where now all click apps seem to not start, while they work for me after colin's trick to install one additional app [12:30] Mirv: it should be from what I understood, but unsure [12:34] davmor2: I'm running some random apps quickly from the manual chart now === alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g [12:39] Mirv: great, I'm about to do the same :) [12:42] OK, that's much better, publishing click [12:46] * sil2100 goes for lunch === cprov_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | Vanguard: cprov | CITrain support - US: robru, cyphermox, rsalveti - EU: sil2100, Mirv, didrocks | CITrain support no answer: use mup bot after 30 minutes, but choose right timezone | Landing instructions: http://goo.gl/8H1Du3. Landing in degraded mode (see http://goo.gl/J1EqPW) [12:57] davmor2: feel free to retest more "Font small" apps too, I marked them slightly different saturated green after testing 4 [12:58] Mirv: will do :) === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch [13:01] elopio: davmor2: joining? [13:16] elopio: I interpreted 69 + 70 results as remaining unfixed AP:s being 2 calendar-app, 2 music-app, 1 messaging-app, 1 unity8 (saviq said has a fix). 70 is problematic since click apps didn't start, so after the new click is in archives we'll need another AP test run [13:17] Mirv, https://code.launchpad.net/~macslow/unity8/fix-object-name-of-notification-ap-test/+merge/210588 FWIW [13:18] elopio: if you agree with those cal + mus + mess ^ I wonder if you could file a bug of each of them tagged qt5.2 so that the http://is.gd/pNalUg list would show the true 5.2 status regarding bugs [13:18] Saviq: ok! [13:19] popey: your bug for the squares can I have the number please I am able to confirm it with joy now :) [13:21] davmor2: bug 1285184 [13:21] bug 1285184 in Ubuntu UI Toolkit "Squares in text where carriage returns should be" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1285184 [13:24] marked the weather app qt 5.2 bug as fixed after testing it works now [13:24] popey: ta [13:25] Mirv: browser not supported error on g+ so the text issue might be fixed but the browser size is causing issues (it's basically trying to open the desktop browser) [13:25] s/desktop browser/desktop version [13:31] didrocks: should I ignore-conflicts now because of the scopes being landed? [13:32] Mirv: oh yeah, you wil need to :) [13:32] well I assume the answer is yes, but just checking before first time use [13:44] didrocks: thanks for the review! [13:44] Wellark: yw ;) === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [13:45] didrocks: will I ping you once the "testing" is done and the silo is ready to land so you can do the necessary NEW universe magic? [13:47] ogra_: cjwatson: I could easily reproduce the click issue when flashing with bootstrap [13:47] Wellark: sure [13:47] ota would indeed be different [13:48] rsalveti, didrocks couldn't [13:48] weird, with bootstrap? [13:48] but well, fixed now :) [13:48] I flashed both manta and flo, got the issue on both [13:48] sure, just reading backlog :-) [13:48] i only did OTA on my flo [13:48]