| === stgraber_ is now known as stgraber | ||
| === kitterma is now known as ScottK | ||
| === SuperLag_ is now known as SuperLag | ||
| === TheDrums is now known as DalekSec | ||
| marcoceppi | Hi everyone, I'm following the instructions on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Going_through_MOTU and have joined the channel! I have to packages, both python modules, that I've maintained over the last 6 months in a ppa that I wish to get in to universe for trusty | 21:24 |
|---|---|---|
| marcoceppi | I realize it's pretty late, but they're somwhat important for juju charm development so having them in trusty for the lts would be quite beneficial | 21:24 |
| === iulian is now known as Guest53422 | ||
| TheMuso | marcoceppi: Ok, have a read as well of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess. | 22:15 |
| marcoceppi | TheMuso: cool, I'll get cracking on this process as well | 22:16 |
| TheMuso | marcoceppi: Great. I won't be able to do anything as a sponsor for now, until the freeze exception is granted, and that likely won't happen during my patch pilot duty time today. If it does, I'll have a look of course. | 22:17 |
| marcoceppi | TheMuso: so, I'll put the latest charm-tools, charmworldlib and amulet in to the ppa, file a bug for each, charmworldlib and amulet for acceptance by an MOTU, then one for charm-tools ffe? or do I need an FFE for all three? | 22:18 |
| TheMuso | marcoceppi: You probably need an FFE for all, since they are considered new upstream releases, but particularly for the new package since it is not in the archive yet. | 22:19 |
| marcoceppi | TheMuso: ack, I'll open an FFE for all three then | 22:19 |
| TheMuso | marcoceppi: Thank you. | 22:19 |
| marcoceppi | TheMuso: so,the FFE guide says I should still have a MOTU review the package | 22:27 |
| marcoceppi | for the two "new" packages | 22:27 |
| TheMuso | marcoceppi: As far as I understand things, there is no point reviewing the package unless it has been given an exception, although I haven't read the document myself in a while, so I may have it wrong. | 22:29 |
| marcoceppi | TheMuso: that makes sense, the doc says otherwise but I'll wait for ubuntu-release to get back to me | 22:29 |
| TheMuso | The way I read that, its not explicit in saying the package needs to be reviewed first, it just says to follow the new packages process. | 22:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!