=== _df is now known as df === ph_afk is now known as ph === ph is now known as Guest94451 [05:26] darkxst, hi, sorry to interrupt you. do you have time to debug bug #1288572 ? I just read your reply. thanks. [05:26] bug 1288572 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "Nvidia driver does not work in Ubuntu GNOME trusty "14.04" (Optimus laptop) " [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1288572 [05:40] hi sgo11 [05:41] hi darkxst, right now, I purged all nvidia-* packages. that means I am using intel graphic card now. which nvidia driver do you want me to install? I found nvida-304 310 319 331. I tried 304 and 331 before. I just want to use nvidia card. I don't really care of my intel card. thanks a lot. [05:42] probably just the latest one (so 331) [05:43] probably just the latest one (so 331) [05:43] darkxst, ok. 331 will install nvidia-prime automatically. all the version before 331 will not install nvidia-prime. [05:43] sgo11, yes, thats because nvidia-prime is pretty new [05:44] darkxst, ok. I will install 331. and switch to lightdm + lxde. and then try "`GDK_SYNCHRONIZE=1 gnome-shell --replace`". [05:44] yeh [05:44] thanks. installing. [05:55] darkxst, hi, I am in another PC now. I tried that. gnome-shell failed to launch. and this time it seems apport picks up an error. there is a pop up window which I can click "continue". what should I do now? [05:56] make sure you have apport-retrace installed [05:56] then you can click "examine locally" [05:56] then the first option "gdb" [05:57] once it drops you into gdb [05:57] set logging file [05:57] darkxst, I don't have apport-retrace. if I install it now, is that too late? [05:57] set loggine on [05:57] set logging on [05:57] bt [05:58] sgo11_, cancel the popup install it, then run ubuntu-bug /var/crash/_usr_bin_gnome-shell***** [05:58] darkxst, Is there anything you want me to be working on? (other than learning a programming language) [05:59] Noskcaj, can you do simple patches? [05:59] darkxst, ok. I think I'd better bring my window manager back. not sure how to do that. pcmanfm is running. openbox is running. hm... [05:59] As in making them? only if python [05:59] Noskcaj, just pulling from git [05:59] sure [06:00] also, can you give me a testimonial at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Noskcaj#MOTU ? [06:00] Noskcaj, this https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/patch/?id=3a8beaaf380a483ce33363031d8d276c371d7af1 [06:00] needs to go into g-s-d and u-s-d [06:01] ok [06:02] Noskcaj, I will add something, but can't really endorse you for upload rights that I don't have! [06:03] darkxst, Just saying my work is good is more than enough. I could even attach a gnome packageset if you think it's worthwhile [06:07] darkxst, hi, I am not sure if this is expected. once I click "examine locally" and then choose first option "gdb". a new terminal pops up. That terminal is just black. the scrollbar becomes smaller and smaller. but everything is just black. when I check with htop, openbox --config-file is using 100% of my cpu core. that's all. [06:09] something might be wrong. anyway. I reboot the machine and try again. [06:09] sgo11_, no not expected [06:10] you should see lots of text scrolling paste will it grabs packages [06:10] just upload the .crash file [06:10] darkxst, ok. will do that. [06:11] Noskcaj, ubuntugnome packageset is a bit retarded right now [06:11] probably better to go for desktop-extras [06:14] darkxst, uploaded to launchpad. [06:15] ricotz, hi, sorry I missed you the other night [06:16] sgo11_, processing now... [06:16] darkxst, thanks. [06:20] darkxst, hi, just wanted to say i have pushed some updates to staging recently and i am hoping you are running those [06:22] ricotz, only in a test VM right now, I've been a bit busy the last couple of weeks and 3.12 is a little unstable ;( [06:23] darkxst, When do you expect the no patch uploads for g-c-c and g-s-d? [06:24] darkxst, ah don't worry -- hmm, runs like a charm here, what is unstable in specific? [06:24] ricotz, there are GC re-entrancy problems [06:25] gcampax is working on it, but I suspect it won't land until after release, fairly major refactoring of gjs involved [06:26] ok, i see [06:26] probably they have just worked around specific cases? [06:27] Noskcaj, still trying to get my FFe approved [06:27] I really hope that finally works out [06:28] if not, I will upload vanilla g-c-c 3.8 [06:28] and hopefully drop all the cruft from g-s-d 3.8 [06:30] And i'm guessing the results of the FFe will change if we want the 3.10 versions of gnome-docs [06:31] Noskcaj, I don't see how that would be affected? [06:31] sgo11_, forwarded a trace upstream [06:31] We should try to have the docs in line with the related software [06:32] Does anyone even use the docs? [06:32] darkxst, sorry, I am a newbie. what does that mean? [06:32] sgo11_, awaiting gnome devs to look at it [06:32] darkxst, not you or i, but i'm sure people do [06:33] darkxst, ok. got it. I will wait for any responses. thanks. [06:33] Noskcaj, they are kind of useless on Ubuntu where you have an entirely mis-matched stack [06:33] personally I alway use the online docs [06:33] understandable [06:36] micmute fix is up [13:29] lucky guess on the channel name :D [13:31] installed 14.04 yesterday and so far a (mostly) flawless experience... well done thus far [13:32] !bug 1292099 [13:32] bug 1292099 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Gnome 14.04 will not install Google Chrome through Ubuntu Software Center" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1292099 [13:33] :( [13:34] afaik this doesn't effect only ubuntu gnome [13:35] yeah, just ran through the text [13:48] For how long will 14.04 be supported ? [13:51] ubuntu gnome is aiming to become LTS and in that case 5 years afaik [13:51] if they don't get LTS status I am not sure... [14:00] because some site was reporting as it seeking approval for a "semi lts status" with the distro supported only till the next lts release === makije is now known as makije^ [14:01] well if that is true then it will be supported for two years... [14:02] but it doesn't really say if you read this - http://ubuntugnome.org/lts-proposal/ [14:10] on a more technical note, what's the compile flag that has been used to disable csd in gnome 3.10 ? === makije^ is now known as makije === makije^ is now known as makije === makije is now known as makije^ [22:13] Hello. Can I ask Wnck specific questions here? [22:13] under python ... === yofel_ is now known as yofel