[01:02] rsalveti, popey, ogra_: image looks good 3 issues volume down doesn't work but up does. gallery doesn't open expexted, sudoku doesn't open expected as the new version failed an ap right popey? [01:02] with that I crash in a heap [01:02] night all [01:36] rsalveti, sorry what was the sdk issue? [01:36] we have deprecated cordova 2.8 [01:37] seems like it was sorted [02:22] popey, did you just push it? [02:35] bregma, good news, that lock screen problem I was having went away. congrats, the new crack is pretty slick [07:35] pmcgowan: yeah, not an issue anymore [07:35] just people using old packages [07:35] davmor2: awesome, thanks for testing it [08:08] scrollback: /opt/click.ubuntu.com/.click/users/@all/com.ubuntu.gallery is indeed a weird path; @all should generally only exist in preinstalled databases, e.g. /usr/share/click/preinstalled/.click/users/@all/com.ubuntu.gallery [08:08] is that still happening or was it some temporary problem? [11:42] does anyone see anything when opening the terminal app on 238 ? [11:42] i dont get how it can have 100% test success [11:44] hmm, works on mako but not on flo [11:46] oops, disregard that .. seems the flo had an old click still [11:51] hmm, but it doesnt start the app even after updating to the new click [11:56] gah ... i wanted to uninstall/reinstall it buut after uninstalling it doesnt show up anywhere [12:11] ogra_: hmm, good point [12:13] 0.5.44 is in the store with ubuntu-sdk-14.04-dev1 [12:13] which 238 should have, no ? [12:13] yes, preinstalled [12:13] right [12:13] but if you upgraded from 237 [12:13] you would have an older version based on ubuntu-sdk-13.10 and that will fail, so that's expected [12:14] well, it worked fine on manta and mako [12:14] just not on flo [12:14] my flo is trusty [12:15] i just upgraded all three devices at the same time ... but flo didnt get the new terminal ... [12:15] update-manager offered it though ... and upgraded it fine [12:16] on 237 my flo is offering new terminal too [12:16] it shouldn't surely [12:17] hmm, and i see only logs in .cache/upstart/ for 0.5.29 and 0.5.40 [12:17] root@ubuntu-phablet:/# click list|grep terminal [12:17] com.ubuntu.terminal 0.5.44 [12:17] thats fine though [12:20] root@ubuntu-phablet:/# grep DEN /var/log/syslog [12:20] Mar 15 13:03:17 ubuntu-phablet kernel: [ 378.574829] type=1400 audit(1394884997.143:146): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" parent=1616 profile="com.ubuntu.camera_camera_2.9.1.253" name="/dev/fb0" pid=4042 comm="camera-app" requested_mask="rw" denied_mask="rw" fsuid=32011 ouid=0 [12:20] nothing about terminal there either [12:20] (though seems like the camera needs access to /dev/fb0 ... ) [12:24] hey [12:25] * Mirv got good night's sleep [12:25] yay === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [22:50] popey: not sure if you're around, but sergiusens will upload the fixed gallery-app soon [22:50] popey: sergiusens: once published I can build another image [22:56] building in jenkins and up soon [22:58] great [23:01] rsalveti: am around [23:01] just ping me when ready [23:15] ~ [23:16] . [23:34] rsalveti, popey troubles in heaven with the store :-P OOPS-5a8ed67a3d3b4ae3a50401cbd5edeaa9 [23:34] ☹ [23:35] sergiusens: haha [23:35] rsalveti, it's like everything aligns [23:35] yeah [23:35] I've pinged webops, but I'm not sure they will respond [23:36] popey, you don't need to be on the hook btw; I can approve too [23:36] ok [23:36] and I would as it would work/launch so it improves tests even if not all eventually pass [23:36] which in theory pass rate should be the same [23:36] yeah [23:38] I'm going to try an reject the current app under review [23:38] it might just be that [23:38] could be [23:42] rsalveti, seems to be that [23:42] sergiusens: awesome [23:42] popey, how do you completely reject/kill a review? [23:42] rsalveti, workflow/ui isn't very polished yet though :P [23:42] yeah, I know [23:43] found it [23:43] "move to waiting for updates" [23:43] oh, interesting [23:43] nope not it [23:43] argh [23:43] getting p$%#@ [23:45] sergiusens: you can reject it [23:45] yesah [23:45] popey, I don't see a button for that :-P [23:45] hmm [23:45] link? [23:45] popey, https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/click-apps/507/ [23:45] ack [23:46] hmm [23:46] there's a "permanently reject" option which you probably dont want [23:46] nope [23:46] "request changes" is the best you have [23:46] popey, I'm thinking of just approving that one and pushing a new one [23:46] popey, already tried that [23:46] which bounces that version [23:47] popey, Changes requested by Sergio Schvezov on 2014-03-15 23:40 - 4 minutes ago [23:47] sergiusens: just approve and upload a new one [23:47] but it's still waiting for review... [23:47] rsalveti, popey I think the problem is framework ubuntu-sdk-13.10 None [23:47] so None was set as the new framework !@@@$ [23:48] oof [23:48] well [23:48] you can ส็็༼ ຈلຈ༽ส็็ [23:48] gah [23:48] stupid macro [23:48] lol [23:48] you can a-pprove [23:48] and then "revert to previous version" [23:48] which will undo it [23:48] Changes can not be accepted and published at this time. Please try again later. [23:48] lol [23:48] this is messed up [23:49] lol [23:51] you have to give it time to publish before unpublishing [23:52] popey, that error was when I hit 'publish' [23:52] care to try? [23:53] 2.9.1.920 is approved [23:53] 2.9.1.925 is published [23:53] er, uploaded [23:55] sergiusens: i cant publish, i dont own the app [23:56] Your application can not be published at this time. Please try again later. [23:56] I get that as app owner