=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== ktosiek_ is now known as ktosiek
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[12:46] <ari-tczew> hi. we are already in UserInterfaceFreeze. can I upload a new upstream bug-fix only release without FFe?
[12:56] <bluesabre> greetings sponsors, would somebody like to upload light-locker-1.2.1 to trusty?
[12:57] <bluesabre> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-locker/+bug/1293100
[12:57] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1293100 in light-locker (Ubuntu) "[needs-packaging] light-locker 1.2.1" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[12:57] <bluesabre> This release addresses a security concern, if light-locker is not currently running when light-locker-command "locks" the screen, the user is sent to vt8 without their session protected
[12:58] <bluesabre> this does not send to a new VT if light-locker is not running, instead producing a message that it is not running (similar to how xscreensaver behaves)
[12:58] <bluesabre> please let me know if there are any questions :)
=== happyaro1 is now known as happyaron
=== dkessel_ is now known as dkessel
[16:49] <Riddell> mardy: hopeful sunday ping?
[18:31] <juliank> bdmurray: python-apt can be synced now again, let us avoid the diff, even if its small (sync request: bug 1293193)
[18:31] <ubottu> bug 1293193 in python-apt (Ubuntu) "Sync python-apt 0.9.3.3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1293193
[18:31] <juliank> There are really no other changes apart from merging the Ubuntu changes.
[18:34] <juliank> It's not the most useful sync currently, but it should help (if no other changes will be done), to get automatic syncs then after trusty release.
[18:35] <Laney> juliank: I can do that - or is there some reason you asked bdmurray directly?
[18:35] <juliank> Laney: Fine with me. I just told him, because he did the last two uploads.
[18:36] <Laney> fair
[18:43] <infinity> juliank: Iz done.
[18:44] <juliank> infinity: thanks, cool.
[18:45] <Laney> Weird, I just said I was doing it
[18:46] <Laney> Anyway, good
[18:46] <infinity> Laney: Oh, I read that how you wrote it "I can do that".  And then went and looked, and you hadn't, so assume you meant that you can, not that you were going to. :P
[18:47] <Laney> Yeah, I was test building and the making a cup of tea :P
[18:47] <Laney> No matter
[18:47] <infinity> Ahh, I didn't test build.  If it's FTBFS, then so would the previous version have been if rebuilt, so buggy either way.
=== FJKong is now known as FJKong_afk
[19:57] <juliank> Is there a project on launchpad about Ubuntu mirrors where I can reassign bug 1027905 to=
[19:57] <juliank> ?
[19:57] <ubottu> bug 1027905 in python-apt (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Mirror ar.archive.ubuntu.com points to a Brazilian Server" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1027905
[20:12] <highvoltage> ue/win 12
[20:17] <infinity> juliank: That's not necessarily a bug at all, if the .ar servers have been deemed to not be able to handle the load or something.
[20:18] <juliank> infinity: Maybe, but it's most definitely not a python-apt bug. So I just reassigned it to Ubuntu (without a package) for now.
[20:18] <infinity> juliank: But #ubuntu-mirrors is probably the right place to redirect it to.
[20:19] <infinity> juliank: Not sure if there's an approriate LP project, but they'd know.
=== lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone
[21:09] <Thedemon007> ubuntu have secuity issues in chromium-browser ?? version ubuntu 32.0.1700.107 debian: 32.0.1700.123 http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/c/chromium-browser/chromium-browser_32.0.1700.123-1~deb7u1_changelog
[21:10] <Thedemon007> The changelog of ubuntu does not show much information. Chromium.org say linux	stable 33.0.1750.152
[21:22] <petersaints> hi guys. I'm having a problem with the Network Manager. It gets the correct IPv6 adresses for my /64 prefix (a MAC based one and another through IPv6 privacy extensions). They show up on ifconfig but they do not show up on "nm-tool" output (the information is also missing from the GUI). I have a feeling that this was working ok up until a few days ago, so I'm not sure if there was some update that broke this. Anyone has an idea about
[21:22] <petersaints> this issue? I was searching for bugs on launchpad and the most similar think I could get was this old and Invalid bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/375088
[21:22] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 375088 in network-manager (Ubuntu) "IPv6 addresses are hidden" [Low,Invalid]
[21:23] <petersaints> Also, if I set the address manually it sows up just ok.
[21:24] <petersaints> I forgot to mention that I'm running Trusty ;)
=== superm1__ is now known as superm1
=== ryanakca_ is now known as ryanakca