| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
| === pgraner` is now known as pgraner | ||
| === psivaa_ is now known as psivaa | ||
| knome | hey, was wondering what the general guideline is for bugs reported against EOL releases | 14:32 |
|---|---|---|
| knome | if the bug can't be reproduced with the latest version (but can't be verified if it still exists in the EOL release), what should the status be? | 14:33 |
| knome | incomplete or won't fix? | 14:33 |
| knome | or something else? | 14:33 |
| hggdh | knome: usually we mark it invalid, with a comment that it cannot be reproduced on a current version, and we are closing it because the affected package is EOL-ed | 14:40 |
| knome | okay, what about the importance? | 14:41 |
| knome | should it be the importance that the bug had if it existed, or undecided? | 14:41 |
| hggdh | it is a good approach. But, since the bug is obsoleted, it does not really matter | 14:41 |
| knome | what is? :) | 14:42 |
| hggdh | setting the importance :-) -- it is moot, since we will not work on it anymore | 14:42 |
| knome | hehe, sure | 14:42 |
| knome | was there a comment-template for those cases somewhere? | 14:43 |
| hggdh | if you can find, somewhere, a possible fix on a later release, you can close fix released, with the caveat that it is a probable match | 14:43 |
| hggdh | no, we do not have a template for it. There might be a template answer, though | 14:43 |
| knome | (also, would be cool to have this information on the wiki - maybe it is there, and i just didn't find it) | 14:43 |
| knome | oki | 14:43 |
| hggdh | let me look for it | 14:43 |
| hggdh | ugh, "waiting for wiki.ubuntu.com"... | 14:45 |
| knome | hehe | 14:45 |
| hggdh | knome: correction -- set to incomplete, and ask the OP to check on a newer release | 14:46 |
| hggdh | knome: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Release_has_reached_EOL | 14:47 |
| knome | haha, okay | 14:47 |
| hggdh | also, the page has a series of common responses you can use | 14:47 |
| knome | bug 407976 | 14:48 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 407976 in xfce4-session "xfce4-session crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/407976 | 14:48 |
| knome | already marked invalid.. ;) | 14:48 |
| knome | and sent a comment | 14:48 |
| hggdh | that's OK. Frankly, for a bug that old...chances are we would need a brand new backtrace (so opening a new bug would be better, with apport processing) | 14:49 |
| knome | yep. | 14:49 |
| hggdh | and the upstream bug was never looked at... sigh | 14:52 |
| knome | well it was assigned.. | 14:54 |
| === om26er_ is now known as om26er | ||
| brainwash | can "One Hundred Papercuts" be dropped from the affects list? having it in the list somehow implies that the problem has been assigned to the papercuts project | 17:35 |
| brainwash | bug 1210898 | 17:35 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1210898 in thunar-volman (Ubuntu) "Thunar does not automatically mount removable drives and media" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1210898 | 17:35 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!