[05:39] <pitti> Good morning
[06:54] <dkessel> Good morning pitti
[07:41] <DanChapman> good morning
[07:41] <elfy> hi DanChapman
[07:45] <DanChapman> elfy hey there :-) how's it going?
[07:47] <elfy> pretty good thanks - you?
[07:48] <elfy> DanChapman: you could possibly do me a favour today - being used to a UK keyboard, install Xubuntu - see if you get this bug 1284635
[07:51] <DanChapman> yeah not bad thanks, sure elfy i'll have to do it after the school run though :-)
[07:51] <elfy> DanChapman: I remember those days :p
[08:13] <jibel> good morning.
[08:14] <jibel> pitti, did you have a look at raring and saucy desktop lts upgrades? If not I will, it looks suspicious
[08:14] <pitti> jibel: ah, not yet; I didn't check upgrades this morning yet
[08:15] <jibel> especially because there is no reason it fails this way on one arch and not ths other
[08:35] <pitti> jibel: argh, I was just hunting the "no autopkgtests run for new source package"
[08:36] <pitti> jibel: turns out our tests had a copy&paste bug, they actually work now
[08:36] <jibel> argh, indeed
[08:37] <pitti> jibel: but you are rewriting that whole thing anyway, so I guess I stop looking at the old code now
[08:39] <jibel> pitti, yes, I'm rewriting autopkgtest.py but I'll have to change the existing testsuite because adt-britney will be reduced to blindly submitting tests and collecting results
[10:56] <davmor2> Morning all
[10:56] <jibel> Good morning davmor2
[13:32] <jibel> xnox, do you know any change between desktop 20140311 and 20140312 which could have removed the step "ubuntu one" in ubiquity?
[13:32] <jibel> version of ubiquity is the same 2.17.8
[13:32] <xnox> jibel: yes. I've unseeded it from the cd, because it is buggy at the moment.
[13:32] <xnox> jibel: it was a cd / iso image building seed change. The ubuntuone plugin package is simply not there.
[13:32] <jibel> xnox, thanks, I'll update the tests.
[13:33] <xnox> jibel: i need to resolve bugs in it, before putting it back.
[13:33] <xnox> jibel: cause failing installations is un-acceptable.
[13:33] <jibel> xnox, agreed, tell me when you put it back and put it back in the tests too
[13:33] <jibel> +I'll
[13:34] <xnox> jibel: ack. Sorry about not warning you in advance.
[13:34] <jibel> xnox, np
[13:35] <jibel> xnox, I'll try to make a smart fix to run u1 tests only when it is installed and supposed to run
[13:37] <xnox> jibel: yeah, one can check that package name is present
[14:10] <knome> balloons, any reason why the tracker updating perl script is not in the repository? :)
[14:11] <balloons> knome, because like all good hacks it's never died or been re-written
[14:11] <balloons> thus, I suppose it now befits a place in the repo
[14:12] <knome> i'll push it ;)
[14:13] <knome> it's up
[14:18] <dkessel> hello balloons
[14:18] <balloons> why hello dkessel
[14:23] <dkessel> balloons: yesterday i thought about running ap tests in a xubuntu environment. thomir said he believes it might be doable. i'm not so sure... ap tests are run in a VM from a ubuntu iso image, right?
[14:24] <balloons> dkessel, well that depends. For ubiquity yes. But for like the core apps it's run in xfvb, no de or wm
[14:25] <balloons> i guess it's a bit odd the xfce apps don't like to be introspected
[14:25] <DanChapman> jibel, i was just coming to speak to you about the U1 page and I see you beat me to it :-)
[14:26] <balloons> :-) interesting it was removed
[14:27] <dkessel> balloons: so you believe the first step would be to check if there is any way to make the introspection work?
[14:29] <balloons> dkessel, I believe that is the hindrance. I don't see any issue running the tests under any de
[14:30] <balloons> AP uses X11 or Mir.. that's the only requirements
[14:33] <DanChapman> balloons: also it needs to be registered on dbus i believe. which quite a few of XFCE  apps don't use
[14:34] <balloons> DanChapman, ohh right.. for introspection to work, the app needs to use dbus. So if that's true about xfce apps, than indeed AP won't work on them
[14:35] <DanChapman> balloons: indeed, i've seen apps like mousepad have the option to run on dbus but it's not required but thats gtk2 anyway which blocks it anyway
[14:38] <dkessel> DanChapman :/
[14:39] <balloons> is xfce going to move off gtk2 ever?
[14:39] <DanChapman> balloons: i believe they are maiing the transition atm
[14:39] <DanChapman> making*
[14:39] <balloons> if they move to gtk3, will they use dbus or no?
[14:43] <DanChapman> i have no idea :-/
[14:47] <elfy> hi both
[14:47] <balloons> buenos días elopio
[14:47] <elfy> DanChapman: did you manage to check that bug?
[14:48] <balloons> we need to look a bit further into the qt 5.2 introduced failures.. need to pick up the fri afternoon conversation again
[14:48] <balloons> elopio, ^^
[14:51] <DanChapman> elfy I can confirm it, I had it sitting there in my browser thinking i'd saved it but i hadn't. thnks for the reminder
[14:51] <elfy> DanChapman: cool - sort of lol
[14:52] <elfy> I'd love to know what the issue is with ibus there - but I don't and can do no more than I have
[14:52] <balloons> which bug?
[14:52] <elfy> if it's not fixed before release every lubuntu/xubuntu and ubuntustudio is going to have the same thing
[14:53] <elfy> bug 1284635
[14:53] <DanChapman> :-/
[14:53] <DanChapman> balloons: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1284635
[14:53] <elfy> DanChapman: yea :-/
[14:54] <elfy> though I think if push comes to shove for us we'll just not seed ibus
[14:55] <elfy> balloons: I found that with a password with an # in it - the password is right, the password is right :|
[14:55] <balloons> ahh
[14:55] <elfy> lol
[14:56] <balloons> wild bug
[14:58] <elfy> balloons: it certainly is
[15:01] <knome> tame it
[15:01] <elfy> I did
[15:02] <elfy> installed fedora :p
[15:21] <elfy> DanChapman: thanks for Me Too'ing and posting in it
[17:15] <senan> balloons, danchapman, hey :)
[17:16] <senan> balloons, can you please review my code ?
[18:03] <balloons> knome, re: community. I'm reading your old post and digging in the wayback machine to find what you've linked to
[18:04] <knome> :)
[18:04] <balloons> I'm also eating a sandwich with green sauce.. yay st patty's day.. heh
[18:04] <knome> LOL
[18:05] <knome> oops
[18:10] <DanChapman> o.O green sauce?
[18:11] <balloons> DanChapman, the curse of having a lovely wife who can cook, but also has a sense of humor :-) I believe it was dyed mustard
[18:12] <DanChapman> balloons: heh that's rather funny!! :-D
[18:14] <balloons> DanChapman, while I have you, have you encountered issues with gtk apps spawning windows offscreen or otherwise undisplayed while running tests?
[18:23] <DanChapman> balloons: no I havn't, the only issues i've seen are with some of the recent compiz bugs (which i think are now fixed) where mouse clicks were not anywhere near the mouse pointer and window chrome vanished.
[20:07] <letozaf> balloons, hello
[20:08] <balloons> hello lderan
[20:08] <balloons> hello letozaf :-)
[20:08] <dkessel> good evening letozaf
[20:08] <letozaf> dkessel, hello :D
[20:09] <letozaf> balloons, I have another error, a new one on launching reminders app
[20:10] <letozaf> balloons, http://paste.ubuntu.com/7110202/
[20:10] <letozaf> balloons, so I am stuck againg :P
[20:13] <balloons> letozaf, can you push your latest code?
[20:13] <lderan> hello balloons
[20:13] <letozaf> balloons, ok just a second
[20:15] <letozaf> balloons, ok done:lp:~carla-sella/reminders-app/new-reminders-app-tests
[20:17] <letozaf> balloons, what does this mean : Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: generating an incremental diff for a merge proposal.  It was logged with id OOPS-d9266c38aa41172fde407fdadff24aec.  Sorry for the inconvenience.
[20:17] <letozaf> balloons, hope I did nothing wrong :P
[20:17] <balloons> grabbing
[20:20] <balloons> ok I got everything :-)
[20:39] <balloons> letozaf, so I'm playing with the new -q option for reminders
[20:40] <letozaf> balloons, what does it do exactly ?
[20:40] <letozaf> balloons, found it with -h
[20:40] <letozaf> balloons, I will try too
[20:42] <balloons> yep :-)
[20:42] <balloons> so I'm trying to launch by passing the qml file
[20:45] <balloons> letozaf, you should see something like using main qml file from:
[20:48] <balloons> letozaf, so much is happening with this I think we should push a merge to just get the launch working and the emulator setup
[20:48] <balloons> then push tests
[20:49] <letozaf> balloons, ok
[20:49] <letozaf> balloons, let me se what happens
[20:50] <balloons> I made some tweaks, but I
[20:50] <balloons> still confused on running from a local binary
[20:52] <letozaf> balloons, I skipped the only test ad left only the part that launches reminders app, but the error is still there
[20:53] <balloons> letozaf, yes no worries
[20:53] <balloons> ok, here's what I understand :-)
[20:53] <balloons> we can't launch this via qmlscene and must use a compiled binary
[20:54] <letozaf> balloons, how do you do that ?
[20:54] <balloons> so in order to test locally, we need to build the binary first
[20:54] <balloons> you can do that using cmake .
[20:54] <balloons> the binary then ends up in src/app/reminders
[20:54] <balloons> then, we can launch this binary and pass it -q with a link to the local reminders.qml file
[20:54] <balloons> which is src/app/qml/reminders.qml
[20:55] <letozaf> balloons, ok, so let me try
[20:55] <balloons> letozaf, I should share my current changes I guess to
[20:57] <letozaf> balloons, ok
[20:58] <balloons> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7110438/
[20:58] <balloons> letozaf, so that now launches properly with a local binary :-)
[20:59] <balloons> I'm going to clean that a little, propose an mp and have you review. we'll merge it, then work on getting tests going
[20:59] <letozaf> balloons, thanks I will try it now
[20:59] <balloons> that way, this first part is out of the way
[20:59] <letozaf> balloons, but the cmake . stuff should also that be done in the test ?
[21:00] <balloons> no
[21:00] <balloons> it's something you would need to do if you want to test against a local changes
[21:00] <balloons> if you are just writing tests it's likely you don't need to build a local copy and it will fall back to an installed version
[21:00] <letozaf> balloons, oh yes you are right !
[21:01] <balloons> we might need to build local copies at first while developing things tho
[21:01] <letozaf> balloons, and what about autopilot vis ?
[21:02] <letozaf> balloons, can we use it now ? and how ?
[21:02] <balloons> autopilot vis should now work via reminders or reminders -q
[21:02] <balloons> with the qml attached
[21:02] <letozaf> balloons, I have tried without success, but maybe I did something wrong
[21:03] <balloons> autopilot launch -i Qt reminders fails?
[21:04] <balloons> letozaf, ok here's the mp: https://code.launchpad.net/~nskaggs/reminders-app/base-ap/+merge/211409
[21:05] <balloons> so that has no tests, just the launch changes and re-org work you've done
[21:06] <balloons> letozaf, ahh I see what you mean on reminders
[21:06] <balloons> that's step two, we'll tackle that once this merges
[21:06] <letozaf> balloons, ok
[21:07] <balloons> it's really hard to share the problem with folks if it's not in trunk
[21:07] <balloons> this should help
[21:07] <letozaf> balloons, ok I approved the review request
[21:08] <balloons> perfect.. ok, we'll let that merge
[21:08] <balloons> now the fun stuff. why is the binary not introspecting
[21:08] <letozaf> balloons, :)
[21:55] <balloons> letozaf, so I'm working on adding those bits to reminders so it works
[21:55] <balloons> I'll try and land it asap
[21:55] <balloons> it's not building atm :-(
[21:55] <letozaf> balloons, ok, I think I will go to bed for now :D
[21:56] <balloons> indeed
[21:56] <balloons> ciao!
[21:56] <letozaf> balloons, ciao and thanks
[21:56] <balloons> thank you as always
[21:56] <letozaf> balloons, :D