| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === didrocks1 is now known as didrocks | ||
| zequence | Hi. Got a package that would need to be uploaded soonish. It's a FFe, and doesn't show in the sponsors queue. It was uploaded to the archives once already, but was rejected due to some lintian warnings, which are gone now Bug: 946591 | 08:54 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 946591 in Ubuntu "[FFe] Add ubuntustudio-live to trusty repositories" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/946591 | 08:54 |
| zequence | ^ | 09:00 |
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
| zequence | ..got it to show in the sponsors queue. | 09:37 |
| === chuck_ is now known as zul | ||
| === pgraner` is now known as pgraner | ||
| === lool- is now known as lool | ||
| dbarth | hi there | 13:26 |
| dbarth | who has the ability to review this FFE: https://bugs.launchpad.net/webbrowser-app/+bug/1288743 ? | 13:27 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1288743 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Support for online accounts in webapp-container" [Undecided,New] | 13:27 |
| dbarth | it is to authorize the landing of a webbrowser-app change on /touch/, knowing that we have limited the binding to not affect the desktop release | 13:27 |
| dbarth | (the feature is not active on the desktop, via a runtime check); and does not build-depend on universe to fit the desktop/main requirements | 13:28 |
| dbarth | seb128: ping? can you help? (it's blocking us on the desktop as well) | 13:39 |
| dbarth | who has the authority to examine the FFE above ^^ | 13:39 |
| seb128 | dbarth, I'm not in the release team | 13:40 |
| seb128 | dbarth, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release | 13:40 |
| dbarth | seb128: i know, but who should i ask for something in between touch and desktop? | 13:41 |
| seb128 | dbarth, FFe are release team material, I just gave you the team on launchpad, it has the list of people | 13:42 |
| seb128 | but you are in the right channel | 13:42 |
| seb128 | they are just busy | 13:42 |
| seb128 | you are not the only one having a FFe request, there is quite some queue | 13:42 |
| dbarth | i can imagine | 13:43 |
| sergiusens | dbarth, my FFes have been open for a week; I think it's just a matter of time | 14:24 |
| === psivaa_ is now known as psivaa | ||
| dbarth | sergiusens: one way or the other,yes, since we're doing time-based releases | 14:27 |
| sergiusens | dbarth, I mean a matter of time until they get to it :-) | 14:28 |
| dbarth | i know ;) | 14:28 |
| Laney | There's quite a few FFes pending | 16:04 |
| Laney | do any of the rest of you have time to look at some of them? | 16:05 |
| cjwatson | dbarth: approved | 16:07 |
| cjwatson | dbarth: hopefully I can get https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/webbrowser-app/multiarch/+merge/211350 rolled in in exchange ;-) | 16:08 |
| dbarth | cjwatson: \o/ thank you :) | 16:15 |
| dbarth | let me check that one | 16:15 |
| Laney | infinity: want to look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils-avr/+bug/1235748 ? | 16:57 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1235748 in binutils-avr (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync binutils-avr 2.23.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] | 16:57 |
| infinity | binutils-avr | 2.23.1-2 | trusty/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el | 16:58 |
| infinity | Laney: Looks already done? | 16:58 |
| Laney | Oh, I didn't check that | 16:59 |
| Laney | who didn't wait for the FFe? | 16:59 |
| Laney | wait | 16:59 |
| Laney | that one is ancient | 16:59 |
| === plars_ is now known as plars | ||
| infinity | Yeah, that happened in October, not an FFe thing. :P | 16:59 |
| Laney | Yeah, we probably ought to clean out the queue at some point. :P | 16:59 |
| Laney | Daviey: If you're still interested in server (MAAS/Openstack) FFes there are a few in the queue | 17:40 |
| Laney | I saw you replied to some already, so letting you know. | 17:40 |
| cjwatson | infinity: libnss-mdns-i386 fauxpkged, though unfortunately it'll need a version bump each time nss-mdns is uploade | 17:54 |
| cjwatson | d | 17:54 |
| cjwatson | (I haven't done anything to the seeds, I'll let you figure that out) | 17:54 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I intend to drop that package in an Ubuntu delta post-trusty anyway. | 17:56 |
| cjwatson | cool | 17:57 |
| * cjwatson looks at the build queues. we can haz powerpc vms on some of the new hosts any time? | 17:57 | |
| infinity | cjwatson: It's only meant for smooth upgrades from lib32nss-mdns to libnss-mdns:i386, so has no use post-LTS. | 17:57 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Twiddling VMs is on my TODO but, realistically, don't know if I'll have time this week. | 17:58 |
| Daviey | Laney: ok, thanks - will take a look this evening. Travelling right now. | 18:00 |
| Laney | Daviey: righto | 18:01 |
| stgraber | infinity: I'm assuming fisher01 is the ppc64el livefs buildd? if so, something seems wrong with it, there are tasks stuck for a couple of days on nusakan. | 18:10 |
| infinity | stgraber: Oh. Derp, I forgot that was the livefs builder when I kept it offline for debugging. I'll bring it back. | 18:12 |
| infinity | stgraber: Should be happy now. | 18:14 |
| stgraber | infinity: ok, I'll kill the remaining ssh processes on nusakan. I'm assuming you cleaned up any remaining livefs cruft on the buildd itself? | 18:15 |
| infinity | stgraber: There probably isn't any to clean up. Let me poke. | 18:15 |
| infinity | I mean, unless it died in the middle of a build, but I doubt it. | 18:16 |
| infinity | Yeah, I see no lock filed or anything. | 18:16 |
| stgraber | ok, nusakan has been cleaned up, so things should start building again with the next cronned run | 18:16 |
| psivaa | infinity: cjwatson: curious about why trusty server iso's are not in cdimage since the 13th if in case anyone pings me.. i see some armhf build failures | 18:17 |
| psivaa | apologies if the info is in the backlog.. dint go that far back | 18:17 |
| infinity | Sorry about that. Just bad luck, I guess, that the 1 in 10 machines that blew up and showed off the IPC race also happened to be the livefs builder. :P | 18:17 |
| stgraber | psivaa: probably the exact same issue we just fixed since that'd have held up publising of all core and server images. | 18:17 |
| cjwatson | right | 18:17 |
| cjwatson | so a whole <10 lines back in scrollback :) | 18:18 |
| stgraber | psivaa: so they should be appearing nowish | 18:18 |
| psivaa | stgraber: cjwatson: ack, thanks :) | 18:19 |
| sergiusens | can someone please look at bug 129094 ? | 19:01 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 129094 in Ubuntu "data CD will not mount and reason given is that I am not root" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/129094 | 19:01 |
| sergiusens | meh | 19:01 |
| sergiusens | can someone please look at bug 1290944 ? | 19:01 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1290944 in phablet-tools (Ubuntu) "[FFe] standing freeze exception in trusty for Ubuntu Touch tools packages" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1290944 | 19:01 |
| sergiusens | latter not former | 19:01 |
| stgraber | sergiusens: approved | 19:06 |
| sergiusens | stgraber, thanks | 19:06 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: hey, fyi, I was asked to alert you to bug #1293681 and bug #1290535 | 19:08 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1293681 in oxide-qt (Ubuntu) "[MIR] oxide" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1293681 | 19:08 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1290535 in webbrowser-app (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Webapps support for the new Oxide container" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1290535 | 19:08 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: there is nothing for you to do now. basically, we hope to land oxide in the archive this week | 19:08 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: when that is done, webapps will transition to using oxide | 19:09 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: I'll handle the MIR bits, so this is just a heads up that the webapps team will need the release team to comment on the FFe, probably next week | 19:10 |
| jdstrand | dbarth: fyi ^ | 19:10 |
| dbarth | jdstrand: ok | 19:29 |
| dbarth | thanks | 19:30 |
| sergiusens | if a package was building fine for arm64 and then finally failed, would that block it in proposed? | 20:09 |
| cjwatson | sergiusens: that depends on whether the version currently in trusty has an arm64 build | 20:11 |
| cjwatson | sergiusens: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration has the rules | 20:11 |
| sergiusens | cjwatson, it does https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-download-manager | 20:11 |
| cjwatson | No it doesn't :) | 20:12 |
| sergiusens | hmm it was depwait for saucy; not sure what the previous results were for trusty; but mandel is saying it used to work | 20:12 |
| sergiusens | I trust you :-) | 20:12 |
| cjwatson | depwait vs. failure doesn't matter | 20:12 |
| * sergiusens checks wiki | 20:12 | |
| cjwatson | the point is it doesn't have binaries in the arhcive | 20:12 |
| cjwatson | *archive | 20:12 |
| sergiusens | right; so it was never in (for amr64) | 20:12 |
| cjwatson | though that build doesn't look desperately far away from working | 20:13 |
| sergiusens | nope | 20:13 |
| mandel | sergiusens, cjwatson I don't know much about this, but I do have a ppa where it does build with no problems: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-006/+build/5661763 | 20:15 |
| cjwatson | that's amd64 not arm64 | 20:15 |
| sergiusens | yeah | 20:16 |
| cjwatson | anyway, this should be fixed but it's no kind of blocker | 20:16 |
| mandel | ah, sorry | 20:16 |
| xnox | sergiusens: i mean, if it ever built, AAs have powers to remove binaries from arches and re-introduce them via copies. Which sometimes is done to unblock things (like last friday for qt5.2) so e.g. $ rmadison -S -s trusty ubuntu-download-manager is authoratative way to look up if binaries are or aren't in the achive and for which arches. | 20:17 |
| mandel | cjwatson, sergiusens ok, so I'm stupid, and I don't think that qmake is placing the libs for arm64 in the correct place, I'll take a closer look | 20:17 |
| xnox | sergiusens: if ever in doubt =) | 20:17 |
| sergiusens | xnox, thanks, will add to my cheats | 20:18 |
| infinity | mandel: Looks like that's the same issue on powerpc too. | 20:25 |
| mandel | infinity, yes, I'm moving away from qmake due to this kind of things, but will fix both archs | 20:25 |
| infinity | mandel: Well, surely the answer is for INSTALL_LIBDIR to be seeded by debian/rules with DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH instead of hardcoding it in common-project-config.pri | 20:26 |
| infinity | Especially since this is wrong too: ARCH = $$system(uname -m) | 20:26 |
| infinity | (Our i386 buildds are all x86_64, using uname to determine userspace ABI is never right. Ever) | 20:26 |
| mandel | infinity, I'm not a qmake expert so I have clearly make an error there, will fix it after dinner | 20:27 |
| infinity | (The only reason that works for you is because we run our i386 builds under "linux32" to fake uname, but one shouldn't rely on that) | 20:27 |
| infinity | mandel: Ahh and, indeed, LIBDIR is already preseedable in your .pri | 20:29 |
| mandel | infinity, yes, I should just be seeding it in the rules and that should sort it out AFAIK | 20:31 |
| slangasek | jdstrand: yes, dbarth mentioned that on here previously; I'll make sure to make time for FFe request processing between now and then | 21:03 |
| jdstrand | slangasek: yes, he mentioned that. new info is that oxide should be in the archive soon. awesome, thanks! :) | 21:04 |
| knome | stgraber, wait, what, where's your "UIF upload" commit for the slideshow? | 21:13 |
| knome | ah, there it is. | 21:14 |
| knome | stgraber, we are *missing* content for one slide (plus some minor uploads), about to land it in the next few hours. will you approve that UIFe? ;) | 21:18 |
| stgraber | knome: sure, file a bug and I'll look at it. Since it'll likely only affect your own documentation and not anything shared with other teams, that shouldn't be a problem. | 21:19 |
| knome | stgraber, was thinking of the same | 21:19 |
| knome | stgraber, i only semi-accidentally even noticed the UIFe note, as i was just landing the first, but almost final version of that slide | 21:20 |
| knome | talk about timing ;) | 21:20 |
| stgraber | I figured that waiting till Monday after UIF would be good enough to catch all last minute changes, apparently not ;) | 21:20 |
| stgraber | (Edubuntu was a bit late too, so you're not alone ;)) | 21:21 |
| knome | yeah, we were supposed to have this ready, but real life comes into the way, the person to write the script was in rome... | 21:21 |
| robru | cjwatson, errrr, can you check on process-cpp? citrain somehow thinks it's in proposed, but I don't see it on any of excuses, launchpad, or even rmadison | 23:04 |
| robru | cjwatson, oh nm, now I see it in rmadison | 23:05 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!