[08:14] <tsdgeos> is it me the only one having that i can't get a login to unity7 anymore?
[08:14] <tsdgeos> i select unity7 and then i get nothing :D
[08:14] <tsdgeos> need to start it from the vt
[08:15] <tsdgeos> and somehow my fonts are different :S
[08:15] <tsdgeos> back in a sec
[08:17] <tsdgeos> fonts are back to correct at least
[08:20] <Saviq> tsdgeos, works fine here, only issue is that I have to unlock twice upon resuming
[08:20] <tsdgeos> maybe something gets upset about me using kdm and not lightdm
[08:21] <tsdgeos> which would be totally sad, but you know how the future is, no more splitting of responsabilities, one process takes it all
[09:04] <didrocks> Saviq: hey, I remember sil2100 mentioning that the unity8 landing has a workaround for the current AP tests, right?
[09:04] <Saviq> didrocks, one of them, yes
[09:04] <didrocks> Saviq: you tested with latest and greatest, of course? :)
[09:05] <Saviq> didrocks, on Friday, so no :P
[09:05] <didrocks> Saviq: well, you dist-upgraded with 5.2?
[09:05] <Saviq> didrocks, of course
[09:05] <didrocks> so I guess that's fine, or do you want an additional try?
[09:05] <Saviq> didrocks, no, go for it please
[09:06] <Saviq> didrocks, we have one more fix in store that we'll land as soon as this is done
[09:06] <didrocks> ok, Mirv, mind giving a look at publishing the unity8 one? ^
[09:06] <didrocks> thanks Saviq :)
[09:08] <didrocks> Saviq: I propose next landing embeed the icon theme changes as well
[09:09] <didrocks> so that one is done and gone
[09:09] <didrocks> (it's only unity8 + a seed change)
[09:09] <Saviq> didrocks, yup, ok
[09:09] <Mirv> didrocks: Saviq: yes, already started, I was thinking doing Unity8 AP tess manually first although if we're back to normal "we don't duplicate tests" then I can just release it :)
[09:10] <didrocks> Mirv: maybe we should do a double check as this testing happened on Friday, just in case, wdyt?
[09:10] <Saviq> Mirv, only unknown issue there was the crash, but I couldn't get to the.crash file
[09:10] <Mirv> didrocks: Saviq: will do, especially since I already enabled PPA:s etc so ready to run tests
[09:10] <didrocks> thanks Mirv :)
[09:12] <tsdgeos> Saviq: so basically kdm doesn't seem to want to start unity7 and lightdm itself doesn't even want to start in my computer ^_^
[09:12] <tsdgeos> something broke a lot over this weekend :D
[09:12] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yikes
[09:21] <Saviq> dednick, hey, could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/suru-switch/+merge/207991? should be small
[09:27] <tsdgeos> meh, everything here is so broken i get this
[09:27] <tsdgeos> tsdgeos_work@xps:~$ start scope-registry
[09:27] <tsdgeos> start: Unknown job: scope-registry
[09:29] <tsdgeos> MacSlow: so about that ghost notification we have there, could you check that we still need it with 5.2?
[09:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, hmm sounds like you removed unity?
[09:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, or parts of it..
[09:30] <tsdgeos> Saviq: well i'm running it now
[09:30] <tsdgeos> so no :D
[09:31] <Saviq> tsdgeos, apt-cache policy libunity-scopes0?
[09:31] <Saviq> tsdgeos, that's what's shipping the scope-registry job
[09:31] <tsdgeos> Saviq: it's there
[09:31] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yeah, but what version?
[09:31] <tsdgeos> i guess that since my session kind of doesn't start properly
[09:31] <tsdgeos> and i've brought stuff up manually
[09:31] <tsdgeos> all is unhappy
[09:31] <MacSlow> tsdgeos, sorry... answered in the wrong channel :)
[09:31] <tsdgeos> Saviq: 0.4.0+14.04.20140312.2-0ubuntu1
[09:31] <MacSlow> tsdgeos, yes... it the "PlaceHolder" for the synchronous notification (e.g. volume up/down) once we'll get a Design and UX for it.
[09:32] <Saviq> tsdgeos, that would complain about upstart being unavailable, not that it can't find the job...
[09:32] <Saviq> MacSlow, yeah, but maybe we don't need it when it's not used
[09:33] <Saviq> MacSlow, and we're not gonna use it on phone IIRC
[09:33] <MacSlow> Saviq, the moment we remove it, I bet I'll get a mockup for it ;)
[09:33] <Saviq> MacSlow, right
[09:34] <MacSlow> Saviq, and I would not want to even further hold back all the notification-related branches due to that
[09:55] <mhr3> Saviq, can i count on silo with new-scopes today?
[09:56] <Saviq> mhr3, I think yes, I only have a small landing to do once the current silo for u8 gets in
[09:56] <Saviq> mhr3, which should be real soon
[09:57] <mhr3> ok
[10:13] <dednick> Saviq: sure
[10:24] <mzanetti> Saviq: so... I was reading through the the 8k diff... Looks quite good. Only thing is the PreviewDelegateMapper. Given that this is a cleanup branch already, I tend to think we should already drop the file and replace it with the simeple if condition.
[10:25] <Saviq> mzanetti, you mean scopedelegatemapper?
[10:25] <mzanetti> err, yeah
[10:25] <Saviq> mzanetti, there should be no previewdelegatemapper any more
[10:25] <mzanetti> *delegatemapper, anyways
[10:25] <Saviq> tsdgeos, get rid of it ↑?
[10:26] <tsdgeos> Saviq: it's used/useful for the tests
[10:27] <mzanetti> ah...
[10:28] <mzanetti> well, again... no biggie... I was just thinking that if we don't clean it up in the cleanup branch, this file will be left stale in the tree eventually
[10:28] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: well, it's used, isn't it?
[10:29] <mzanetti> tsdgeos: it is right now, but could be replaced by a "scope == apps ? DashApps.qml : GenericScopeView.qml"
[10:29] <mzanetti> tsdgeos: and as DashApps will go away soon too...
[10:29] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: well it'll be stale when it's stale, not now ;)
[10:30] <mzanetti> ok
[10:37] <tsdgeos> Saviq: so i have the patch that kills DashFilterGrid.qml and moves it to CardFilterGrid.qml
[10:37] <tsdgeos> Saviq: commit to cleanup?
[10:37] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yeah
[10:38] <tsdgeos> done
[10:40] <tsdgeos> and i broke tests ^_^
[10:43] <tsdgeos> done now
[10:45] <Saviq> mzanetti, thanks for catching the panel issue, fixing
[10:46] <mzanetti> np
[10:51] <Saviq> mzanetti, btw, trunk just got the prereq branches merged
[10:51] <mzanetti> Saviq: nice. thanks
[10:52] <Saviq> mzanetti, or actually, /me needs to push a button first
[10:52] <mzanetti> ack
[10:55] <Saviq> mzanetti, done
[10:58] <mzanetti> Saviq: is there a way to update the diff on LP without pushing something?
[10:58] <mzanetti> I guess resubmitting would do
[10:58] <Saviq> mzanetti, no need
[10:59] <Saviq> mzanetti, LP will notice
[10:59] <Saviq> (should)
[10:59] <Saviq> mzanetti, give it a few minutes
[10:59] <mzanetti> ok
[11:09] <Saviq> Mirv, hey, can we have a silo for row 55?
[11:16] <Saviq> dednick, re: icons being small, that's probably because you didn't actually get the suru icons, which don't have padding like the others had
[11:16] <dednick> Saviq: hm. i installed the theme...
[11:17] <Saviq> dednick, yeah, I can't get it to work on desktop here either
[11:17] <Saviq> dednick, and Icon is working, we still need the colourize, only issue is that they're not aspect-correct, but that was design-approved for the time being
[11:34] <Cimi> Saviq, tsdgeos you guys need help with new scopes?
[11:35] <Saviq> Cimi, we're good I think
[11:35] <Cimi> reviews?
[11:35] <Saviq> didrocks, can we get a silo for row 55 please?
[11:35] <Saviq> Cimi, there's plenty of branches in need of review in https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/trunk/+activereviews
[11:35] <didrocks> on porter, will get back to you afterwards
[11:36] <Cimi> Saviq, saw that, was wondering if you had one in particular
[11:36] <Cimi> I'll start
[11:36] <Mirv> Saviq: seems to be already
[11:36] <Mirv> Saviq: correction, not. so, now in landing-012
[11:36] <Saviq> Mirv, thanks
[11:36] <Saviq> didrocks, unping
[11:37] <didrocks> good :)
[11:40] <Saviq> xnox, hey, did you manage to have a look at crossbuilding under Qt 5.2? the Qt cmake modules fail now due to mkspecs being in multiarch libdirs
[11:41] <tsdgeos> Saviq: are you merging trunk to new-scopes-clean-to-trunk and new-scopes-cleanup or should i?
[11:41] <Saviq> tsdgeos, I can
[11:41] <tsdgeos> Saviq: cool
[11:50] <Cimi> tsdgeos, https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/new_tabbar/+merge/210453
[11:50] <Saviq> tsdgeos, mzanetti, the clipping of DashContent is about when we "zoom out" on right edge
[11:50] <tsdgeos> Cimi: what?
[11:51] <Cimi> tsdgeos, the -1 is for debugging purpose?
[11:51] <Cimi> tsdgeos, we can probably just use 0
[11:51] <Saviq> tsdgeos, mzanetti, and in new-scopes about non-favourite scopes we open from the scopes scope
[11:51] <Saviq> hence the || scopeView.visible
[11:51] <tsdgeos> Cimi: why would you default to 0 as selectedIndex?
[11:51] <tsdgeos> -1 is a much better default
[11:52] <Saviq> we're actually *only* doing scale <= 1.0, never > 1.0 IIRC
[11:52] <Saviq> contentScale: 1.0 - 0.2 * disappearingAnimationProgress, so yeah
[11:52] <Cimi> as default, yes
[11:52] <Saviq> tsdgeos, mzanetti, there should be no need to clip the ScopeItem, though
[11:53] <Saviq> or well, bottom, so maybe we need it too
[11:53] <Saviq> yeah, we do
[11:54]  * Saviq reboots
[12:02] <Cimi> tsdgeos, just curiosity, why you put connections outside sortfilterproxymodel?
[12:02] <Cimi> they don't work inside it?
[12:03] <Cimi> at least the connection of dashcontentlist
[12:03] <tsdgeos> Cimi: which connections?
[12:03] <tsdgeos> ah
[12:03] <tsdgeos> because they were there
[12:03] <tsdgeos> and i just changed them
[12:04] <Cimi> ok
[12:09] <Cimi> tsdgeos, isn't like a binding loop here?
[12:09] <tsdgeos> Cimi: because a changes b and b changes a?
[12:09] <Cimi> yes
[12:09] <tsdgeos> no
[12:10] <tsdgeos> because it's not a binding
[12:10] <tsdgeos> just javascript code
[12:11] <Cimi> when tabbar model changes cound, tabbbar model changes selected index, which will change dashcontestlist index, which has a connection to selected index of tabbar model
[12:11] <tsdgeos> yes
[12:11] <tsdgeos> and will change it to 3
[12:12] <tsdgeos> so as it was 3
[12:12] <tsdgeos> it will do nothing
[12:12] <tsdgeos> no?
[12:13] <Cimi> tsdgeos, I see now
[12:13] <Cimi> tsdgeos, was simple, but better to check before approving things :)
[12:18] <paulliu> Cimi: Actually I got the ZoomableImage from an ancient project of MeeGo. So should I re-factor it to the Components? Because LazyImage is also there. Not sure if we need that to be in the SDK.
[12:18] <Cimi> paulliu, it's fine if you used someone else code
[12:19] <Cimi> paulliu, but we need to test it
[12:19] <Cimi> paulliu, in any case Components
[12:19] <Cimi> paulliu, then possibly one day SDK
[12:19] <paulliu> Cimi: ok. got it.
[12:20] <mzanetti> meh... did a upgrade and now my opengl is slooooow
[12:25] <Cimi> mzanetti, you sure you're running opengl? :)
[12:26] <mzanetti> Cimi: yeah, if I turn it off, everything is fast again, but ofc no transparancy or shadows or anyhting
[13:07] <Cimi> can you retrigger? http://s-jenkins.ubuntu-ci:8080/job/unity8-ci/2469/rebuild
[13:16] <mzanetti> Saviq: with new-scopes, is there supposed to be a scope that searches everything? Like the Home scope did?
[13:16] <Saviq> mzanetti, unity-scope-scopes
[13:16] <mzanetti> ah, the scopes scope
[13:17] <mzanetti> wah... no space left on device to install the scopes scope :D
[13:18] <Cimi> this space thing just made me waste half an hour
[13:18] <mzanetti> Saviq: tsdgeos: here's some more new-scopes feedback: https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/new-scopes-clean-to-trunk/+merge/209459/comments/498372
[13:19] <Saviq> mzanetti, re [] in \n
[13:20] <Saviq> mzanetti, it's a Qt/Ubuntu font bug, nothing we can do about it
[13:20] <mzanetti> ah ok... if its known and under investigation its ok
[13:35] <mzanetti> Cimi: can you give some input on this? https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/new-scopes-clean-to-trunk/+merge/209459/comments/498379
[13:35] <mzanetti> and perhaps fix it?
[13:36] <Cimi> mzanetti, old performance issues
[13:37] <Cimi> on maguro
[13:37] <Cimi> mzanetti, the 18 assumption, is to avoid caching shitload of pixels on higher density devices
[13:37] <Cimi> like the nexus 10
[13:38] <mzanetti> Cimi: doesn't the N10 have 16px/gu only?
[13:38] <Cimi> mzanetti, manta is 20
[13:40] <Cimi> mzanetti, can you retrigger this? https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/new_tabbar/+merge/210453
[13:40] <mzanetti> Cimi: I can give you permissions to trigger it :)
[13:42] <Cimi> mzanetti, I think I need my pgp key
[13:42] <Cimi> and I don't know where it is
[13:43] <mzanetti> Cimi: for the VPN?
[13:43] <Cimi> yep
[13:43] <Saviq> Cimi, unrelated to pgp btw ;)
[13:44] <Saviq> didrocks, so... I'm not sure what happened (maybe Qt 5.2?), but I can't get unity8 to load the suru icons...
[13:45]  * Saviq builds in saucy
[13:45] <Cimi> Saviq, gpg
[13:45] <Saviq> Cimi, again, unrelated
[13:45] <Saviq> Cimi, it's a vpn key, nothing to do with gpg / pgp
[13:46] <Cimi> Saviq, thought we needed that key to have vpn
[13:46] <seb128> Saviq, do you try on a desktop?
[13:46] <didrocks> Saviq: urgh?
[13:46] <didrocks> Saviq: the package isn't installed by default
[13:46] <Cimi> Saviq, at least this was a year ago
[13:46] <Saviq> Cimi, yes, but it's not pgp/gpg
[13:46] <didrocks> did you install it manually?
[13:46] <Saviq> didrocks, yes I did
[13:46] <Cimi> Saviq, which key then?
[13:46] <Saviq> seb128, yeah
[13:46] <Saviq> Cimi, vpn key
[13:46] <seb128> Saviq, Qt got fixed to respect the xsettings, maybe that override your choice?
[13:46] <seb128> Saviq, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,49387
[13:47] <Cimi> Saviq, cnonical sends it encrypted and you need pgp/gpg to decrypt it
[13:47] <Saviq> seb128, sounds sane
[13:47] <Saviq> Cimi, ok, that explains things ;)
[13:48] <Cimi> Saviq, which I lost when the laptop totally broke last time
[13:48] <Saviq> Cimi, your pgp key is probably something worth making a backup of, then ;)
[13:49] <Saviq> seb128, where do I change the theme these days?
[13:50] <seb128> Saviq, icon theme? gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface icon-theme
[13:50] <Cimi> Saviq, I did!
[13:50] <Cimi> Saviq, worth remembering where I put it :D
[13:50] <Saviq> Cimi, indeed ;)
[13:53] <dpm> hi pstolowski, for the Go scopes, what you've been looking at is to use Go bindings directly, or would a Go scope template be using a C++ library? The reason I'm asking is because it seems that if we're using pure Go cross-compilation would be fine, but it might get trickier if the Go scope template would need to reference C++ code
[13:54] <pstolowski> dpm, hey! the go bindings use scopes c++ lib, but for specifics please talk to jamesh
[13:58] <mzanetti> Saviq: the activityindicator in the new scopes preview looks a bit odd/misplaced imo. Is this designed like this? or should there perhaps be a dark overlay or something that makes it clear what this indicator is for?
[13:58] <Saviq> mzanetti, there is no design for it unfortunately, we're thinking it should go to the header maybe
[13:58] <Saviq> mzanetti, but we'll need design feedback for it
[13:59] <mzanetti> yeah, sonething... as it is right now its not really good imo
[13:59] <mzanetti> Saviq: should I mention that in the review or do we want to land it nevertheless and improve this later?
[14:00] <Cimi> mzanetti, what does the 404 error on autopilot on otto means? https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity8/selectively-skip-nm-test/+merge/206985
[14:01] <mzanetti> Cimi: probably not publised to the public jenkins yet
[14:01] <Cimi> mzanetti, so I have to wait?
[14:01] <Saviq> mzanetti, later
[14:01] <mzanetti> Cimi: yeah, you can use the time to search for you pgp key and connect VPN :P
[14:02] <Cimi> hah
[14:02] <Saviq> mzanetti, with the new header, hopefully
[14:02] <mzanetti> ack
[14:02] <mzanetti> Saviq: so should we ignore the header issues I discovered too?
[14:02] <Saviq> mzanetti, right... probably
[14:02] <mzanetti> or is that different
[14:02] <Saviq> mzanetti, well, not the fact it's not showing while
[14:02] <Saviq> whole
[14:02] <Saviq> mzanetti, but the fact it doesn't show on start, yes
[14:03] <mzanetti> ok. I'll leave the comments, you guys fix what you think can/should be fixed and reply for the rest. that works for me
[14:03] <Saviq> didrocks, seb128 so... whatever I do, whether we call QIcon::setThemeName or not, whether I set the system theme to "suru" or not... doesn't seem to affect the icons at all, WTH :/
[14:04] <Saviq> did they change the whole docs layout *again*???
[14:04] <mhr3> tsdgeos, so... what to do about the dee-qt thing?
[14:04] <tsdgeos> mhr3: https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/dee-qt/powerpc-pie/+merge/211308
[14:05] <tsdgeos> mhr3: http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-toolchain/2014-January/003942.html
[14:05] <tsdgeos> mhr3: broken/buggy linker it seems
[14:05] <mhr3> tsdgeos, oh wow...
[14:08] <didrocks> Saviq: urgh, possiblity, did you ask the sdk guys?
[14:08] <seb128> Saviq, same here it seems :/
[14:10] <Saviq> didrocks, yeah, no response :P
[14:10]  * didrocks sigh
[14:13] <dpm> thanks pstolowski
[14:14] <seb128> Saviq, didrocks: modules/Ubuntu/Components/plugin/unitythemeiconprovider.cpp:    QIcon::setThemeName("ubuntu-mobile");
[14:14] <seb128> changing that in the uitk to "suru" makes sure used
[14:14] <didrocks> hum
[14:15] <Saviq> right, that wasn't there before
[14:15] <didrocks> that was my MP?
[14:15] <seb128> Saviq, didrocks: so it's our uitk overriding the theme
[14:15] <didrocks> ah
[14:15] <didrocks> in toolkit
[14:15] <didrocks> grrr
[14:15] <didrocks> I don't care enough of it right now, enough battle to pick…
[14:27] <tsdgeos> Saviq: does https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/unity-phablet-qmluitests-trusty/1378/consoleFull mean the build was killed because it took more than 90 min?
[14:27] <Saviq> tsdgeos, they get stuck sometimes
[14:27] <Saviq> tsdgeos, normal run is ~50 mins
[14:28] <tsdgeos> Saviq: get stuck *where* ?
[14:28] <tsdgeos> i mean tryComprae fails after 5 seconds
[14:28] <tsdgeos> so how can it get stuck?
[14:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, something, not sure, but saw it happen in jenkins a few times now
[14:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, never outside of it...
[14:31] <tsdgeos> if someone could activate the timestamps as i asked :/
[14:31] <Cimi> can I try to fix this binding loop?
[14:31] <Cimi> it makes reading logs impossible
[14:31] <Cimi> only with grep/search
[14:31] <tsdgeos> i think i had some fix somewhere in seemore
[14:31] <tsdgeos> let me see
[14:40] <mzanetti> Saviq: acceptable? https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/make-single-testfunction/+merge/205035
[14:41] <mhr3> Saviq, we'll be able to get rid of the dep on unity-core soon... yey! :)
[14:41] <mzanetti> I would have been in desperate need of this when doing the test fixes for 5.2 :)
[14:43] <Saviq> mhr3, :)
[14:43] <Saviq> mzanetti, "merge trunk... and do something else" really? :D
[14:44] <mzanetti> Saviq: obvisously not intentional
[14:44] <mzanetti> but yeah... happened :/
[14:44] <tsdgeos> Cimi: i can't find if i fixed it, so sure give it a go :)
[14:44] <mzanetti> and I figured it to be easy enough to not have to undo stuff
[14:44] <Cimi> hah ok
[14:44] <Saviq> mzanetti, so you didn't make it work with ninja, just made it not break ninja? ;)
[14:44] <mzanetti> yeah
[14:45] <Saviq> mzanetti, one thing I'd be wary of is case sensitivity
[14:45] <mzanetti> couldn't find any way to do this.
[14:45] <Saviq> mzanetti, not sure "Ninja" will always be cased like this
[14:46] <mzanetti> hmm... ok. can do that. but so far I've only seen case sensitive generator names. probably I haven't seen all of them though
[14:50] <mzanetti> Saviq: pushed
[14:50] <Saviq> mzanetti, thanks
[14:50]  * mzanetti goes for a run. bbiab
[14:50] <Saviq> mzanetti, OTOH I'd probably go for make to be the special case, not ninja
[14:51] <Saviq> mzanetti, this way we don't break other generators...
[14:51] <mzanetti> Saviq: hmm... fair point
[14:51] <Saviq> tsdgeos, can you follow up on https://code.launchpad.net/~macslow/unity-notifications/dont-ignore-placeholder/+merge/206950 please
[14:51] <tsdgeos> yes
[14:54] <mzanetti> Saviq: pushed.
[14:54] <Saviq> mzanetti, one last thing before you go :D
[14:54] <mzanetti> heh
[14:54] <mzanetti> hit me
[14:54] <Saviq> mzanetti, can https://code.launchpad.net/~unity-team/unity8/new-scopes-cleanup/+merge/209642 be put into clean-to-trunk?
[14:55] <Saviq> mzanetti, I don't want it to be a separate commit in trunk, so if you don't have any more issues with it, I'll merge it there
[14:55] <mzanetti> Saviq: hmm, yeah, I guess we can now... if you promise not to push any more other changes to that branch
[14:55] <mzanetti> Saviq: yeah. definitely merge them together in the end
[14:55] <Saviq> mzanetti, "that" → cleanup?
[14:56] <mzanetti> Saviq: no, the to-trunk one... I'd prefer no more "lets get this small thing in too" after it's >8k
[14:56] <mzanetti> Saviq: so if you still want to do small changes in the trunk one, lets only merge the 2 before going to trunk
[14:56] <Saviq> mzanetti, ok
[14:56] <mzanetti> they are quite hard to review already now
[14:56]  * Saviq will do a silo with both and reconfigure later
[14:57] <mzanetti> ok
[14:57] <mzanetti> ok. will be back in less than an hour
[15:01] <tsdgeos> Saviq: we "killed" lp:~unity-team/unity8/new-scopes, right?
[15:01] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yes, it's abandoned
[15:02] <tsdgeos> Saviq: so i should "rebase" https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/new-scopes_do_not_request_previews_on_activate/+merge/209461 to new-scopes-clean-to-trunk?
[15:03] <Saviq> tsdgeos, yeah please
[15:03] <Saviq> tsdgeos, and maybe we can get a test now?
[15:04] <tsdgeos> will try
[15:05] <tsdgeos> Saviq: against new-scopes-clean-to-trunk or new-scopes-cleanup?
[15:05] <Saviq> tsdgeos, your call
[15:05] <tsdgeos> i read something about you wanting to merge them, not sure if that happened already
[15:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, not yet, we'll do that just before merging into trunk
[15:06] <tsdgeos> ok
[15:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, so yeah, on top of cleanup, probably
[15:06] <Saviq> tsdgeos, so that you get all the test fixes already
[15:08] <tsdgeos> sure
[15:15] <tsdgeos> mterry: https://code.launchpad.net/~mterry/unity8/hide-greeter-on-focus-request/+merge/201817
[15:16] <mterry> tsdgeos, will re-merge, thanks
[15:17] <tsdgeos> dednick: https://code.launchpad.net/~nick-dedekind/unity8/indicators.hint-interval/+merge/202104
[15:17] <dednick> tsdgeos: ta
[15:22] <Cimi> tsdgeos, does it require some special package? it fails https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/new_tabbar/+merge/210453
[15:23] <tsdgeos> Cimi:
[15:23] <tsdgeos> * Are there any related MPs required for this MP to build/function as expected?
[15:23] <tsdgeos> https://code.launchpad.net/~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/tabsModelIndex/+merge/210380
[15:35] <tsdgeos> Saviq: i'm confused, you asked me to test https://code.launchpad.net/~macslow/unity-notifications/dont-ignore-placeholder/+merge/206950 but you say you already have, no?
[15:38] <Saviq> tsdgeos, I wanted you to follow up, since you reviewed it already
[15:38] <tsdgeos> ok
[15:38] <tsdgeos> i'll test it again anyway
[15:38] <tsdgeos> almost there :D
[15:39] <Cimi> on the phone, indicator tells me it's connected but it's a LIE
[15:46] <Cimi> mzanetti, can you retrigger this as well? https://code.launchpad.net/~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/tabsModelIndex/+merge/210380
[15:46] <mzanetti> Cimi: done
[15:46] <Cimi> thx
[15:47] <Cimi> mzanetti, all were built with qt 5.0
[15:47] <Cimi> I think I lost my gpg
[15:54] <Saviq> mzanetti, you back?
[15:54] <mzanetti> Saviq: yes
[15:54] <Saviq> mzanetti, quick look at https://code.launchpad.net/~saviq/unity8/undisable-hud/+merge/211344 please
[15:54] <Saviq> mzanetti, I jumped the gun on landing that...
[15:54] <Saviq> Friday afternoon brainfart
[15:54] <mzanetti> huh?
[15:54] <Saviq> mzanetti, I landed disable-hud
[15:55] <Saviq> mzanetti, need to revert
[15:55] <mzanetti> oh...
[15:55] <mzanetti> yeah. that should have gone with the SDK people
[15:55] <Saviq> mzanetti, worse than that, needs test scripts updated in smoketesting and such
[15:55] <mzanetti> Saviq: I thought that happened already
[15:55] <Saviq> mzanetti, in -ci, yes, not in smoke
[15:56] <Saviq> because, of course, there's 10 different ways to test and scripts...
[15:56] <mzanetti> ah, I see
[15:56] <mzanetti> approved
[15:56] <Saviq> mzanetti, anyway, yeah, Didier approved already
[15:56] <mzanetti> heh, thanks didrocks... you saved me 10 pushups
[15:57] <didrocks> mzanetti: what's this rule? :p
[15:57] <didrocks> like a punishement?
[15:57] <mzanetti> didrocks: I always forget to top-approve and decided to do pushup so I hopefully start remembering
[15:57] <didrocks> ahah
[16:02] <Saviq> didrocks, I told him to go exponentially from the initial 5, but he's a pussy ;P
[16:02] <didrocks> roh, worse than I. How is it possible?
[16:06] <MacSlow> tsdgeos, Saviq: Do you happen to know about this QWARN "QQmlComponent: Created graphical object was not placed in the graphics scene." that's what my notification qmltests spit out ever since the move to Qt 5.2. They also segfault frequently.
[16:06] <MacSlow> tsdgeos, Saviq: I'm already searching for some more info, but thought perhaps you already know about it and how to avoid it.
[16:07] <Saviq> MacSlow, that looks like things getting torn down too quickly, sounds like some waitForRendering() could help
[16:07] <tsdgeos> mterry: never seen it
[16:07] <tsdgeos> err
[16:07] <tsdgeos> mterry: sorry
[16:07] <Saviq> MacSlow, do you have a trace for the SEGV?
[16:07] <tsdgeos> MacSlow: never seen it
[16:08] <MacSlow> Saviq, not atm
[16:09] <tsdgeos> Saviq: ok, approved MacSlow's notification thing
[16:11] <Saviq> tsdgeos, thanks
[16:11] <Cimi> mzanetti, I changed and activated my pgp
[16:11] <Cimi> mzanetti, can I haz jenkins?
[16:12] <Saviq> Cimi, you want the VPN access details? mzanetti can't give that to you
[16:12] <Saviq> Cimi, only IS can
[16:12] <MacSlow> Saviq, best trace of the segfault I could get... http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7108933 missing some -dbg packages still
[16:13] <Cimi> Saviq, ok
[16:13] <mzanetti> Cimi: yeah, once you have VPN to the QA lab, sign up a user account at jenkins
[16:13] <mzanetti> Cimi: once you have that I can grant you permissions to retrigger jobs
[16:13] <Saviq> yikes it's crashing *in* waitForRendering... that's interesting
[16:14] <MacSlow> tsdgeos, thx for the review btw
[16:20] <tsdgeos> dednick: anything missing for top approval of https://code.launchpad.net/~aacid/unity8/indicator_highlight_x_position/+merge/209400 ?
[16:25] <dednick> tsdgeos:  nope
[16:29] <MacSlow> dednick, any idea about the failing unity8.indicators.tests.test_indicators.IndicatorTestCase.test_indicator_exists here -> https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-runner-mako/5830/console ?
[16:30] <tsdgeos> Saviq: anything in new-scopes that need my attention or should i go back to having a look at mterry's split?
[16:31] <Saviq> tsdgeos, mzanetti added a comment recently, did you go through it?
[16:31] <dednick> MacSlow: NoSuchProcess: no process found with pid 8773
[16:31] <dednick> MacSlow: looks like unity crashed
[16:31] <Saviq> yup
[16:32] <tsdgeos> Saviq: no, let me read it
[16:33] <Saviq> MacSlow, rerun the job, it was the Qt 5.0 crash, we're on 5.2 now
[16:34] <MacSlow> Saviq, already retriggered it
[17:21] <mhr3> Saviq, extend-scope-tool needs some review love
[21:39] <robru> anybody around to help me troubleshoot a titlebar-menu issue in latest unity7? it stopped working recently (ie, no menubar integration is happening at all for me), not sure if I broke it or if there's been a regression or what