[07:49] <doko> siretart, there are some packages in -proposed waiting on a newer x264. do you think it's safe to merge, and if yes, the version from unstable or experimental?
[10:17] <highvoltage> 1/win 12
[10:51] <kdeuser56> pitti: apport-retrace does not work here on 14.04 if there is no signature for it ...
[10:52] <kdeuser56> pitti: for the package that crashed i mean
=== Zic_ is now known as Guest29924
=== qengho is now known as CardinalFang
=== CardinalFang is now known as qengho
=== Daviey_ is now known as Daviey
=== NCommander is now known as Guest89150
[13:06] <siretart> doko: I believe x264 should be quite safe. I have no idea why jcristau doesn't approve #738978
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
=== Snow-Man_ is now known as Snow-Man
[14:17] <brainwash> there was a request to upgrade the version of xscreensaver, but is has not been approved yet
[14:17] <brainwash> bug 1283459
[14:17] <ubottu> bug 1283459 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu) "FFE: Please merge xscreensaver (5.23-1) from Debian unstable" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1283459
[14:18] <brainwash> can we get it still in or will trusty ship with the same old version (5.15.)?
[14:19] <brainwash> the new version fixes this (securiy-related) issue -> bug 1229486
[14:19] <ubottu> bug 1229486 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu) "xscreensaver-command is slow at locking" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1229486
=== kees_ is now known as kees
[16:38] <j_f-f> Hi..
[16:39] <j_f-f> which version of libwfmath is planed for trusty? 0.3-6 or  >1.0.0?
[16:42] <philwyett> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=trusty&searchon=names&keywords=libwfmath
[16:53] <infinity> j_f-f: That depends on if https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736315 ever gets sorted out, and if anyone in the Ubuntu community cares enough to validate all the rdeps and get it in.
[16:53] <ubottu> Debian bug 736315 in src:wfmath "wfmath: Please upload version 1.0 to to satisfy other packages B-D (and fix their RC bugs)" [Serious,Open]
[16:54] <infinity> Well, I guess the only rdeps are eris and mercator.  So, yeah, if the Debian maintainer sorts it all out, I'm sure we could upgrade.
[16:54] <j_f-f> infinity: ok and thanks
[16:55] <j_f-f> I am looking on mercator
[16:56] <infinity> j_f-f: Your best path forward is to prod that Debian bug and see why there hasn't been any action, I'd say.  If the maintainer just hasn't gotten to it yet, such is life.  If he's been sitting on an upload and awaiting a sponsor or something, I suspect we know a few DDs who could help out.
[16:57] <infinity> j_f-f: (And I say the best path forward is in Debian, because the Ubuntu upload history for those 3 packages doesn't seem to show a whole lot of interest from anyone in forking and maintaining it in Ubuntu specifically, so better to sort it at the source)
=== TheMaster is now known as Unit193
=== FJKong is now known as FJKong_afk
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
=== jackson is now known as Guest99380
=== Guest99380 is now known as Noskcaj
=== WebbyIT is now known as rpadovani
=== Guest29924 is now known as Zic