=== zequence_ is now known as zequence [08:33] Are there any future thoughts for supporting debian releases in PPAs? `add-apt-repository ppa:ts.sch.gr` works from e.g. wheezy, but of course then it says that it can't download the repository index... [08:36] there's also talk about non-launchpad debian ppas [08:36] still in planning though, iirc === soren_ is now known as soren [08:37] That's be cool :) [08:37] *'d [08:37] https://launchpad.net/debian/+ppas [08:37] hang on, isn't this it? [08:37] i mean the launchpad support for debian ppas, that is [08:37] have you tried uploading to them? [08:38] Not in the last year or so... [08:39] it also looks quite empty compared to https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas [08:39] try copying the [ppa] section from /etc/dput.cf and making one that uplods to .../debian instead of .../ubuntu [08:39] Launchpad PPAs do not support Debian. [08:39] oh :( [08:39] It's mostly a matter of build resources. [08:40] "copy packages" from some ppa doesn't list any debian release as a target... ah, thanks wgrant [08:41] Debian was working on similar functionality in dak a few months ago, but I haven't kept up to date with that this year. [08:43] From what I read in the mailing lists, those seem to only target DDs... [08:43] So it wouldn't be quite like launchpad PPAs, where any developer can upload === alkisg is now known as work_alkisg [12:51] can we prevent a user from assigning themselves to a bug over and over again https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306 ? [12:51] Ubuntu bug 1292306 in qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "Upon upgrading to Qt5.2 the music app no longer plays the next song if the screen is off" [Critical,In progress] [13:10] Saviq: ask them not to do that? [13:11] dobey, they've been asked already [13:12] dobey, https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306/comments/11 [13:12] Ubuntu bug 1292306 in qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "Upon upgrading to Qt5.2 the music app no longer plays the next song if the screen is off" [Critical,In progress] [13:12] didn't work [13:31] Saviq: it looks like mostly an issue of being over-enthusiastic on their part. https://bugs.launchpad.net/~rprosamaria383/+assignedbugs [13:40] Saviq: i just sent a more stern e-mail warning that if it does not stop it will be viewed as spam and the account disabled [14:16] dobey, thanks === [ESphynx] is now known as ESphynx === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [19:42] Is it a *requirement* to sign packages to upload them to my PPA? [19:42] yes [19:42] I ask because I build on Ubuntu, but my system with gpg keys is a Fedora box. Dput does not exist on Fedora. [19:43] try debrsign [19:43] cjwatson, thanks [19:44] balor: howdy! [19:44] czajkowski, hey...did I ever tell you of my undying preference for .rpm over .deb? [19:45] czajkowski, I'm struggling to make a release of some software. [19:45] balor: If you ask someone may be able to point you in the right direction [19:45] balor: also, long time no see! [19:47] czajkowski, yes, I've been busy. I've just built some .deb files and am trying to get them into PPA. So now I just have to sign and dput them. I'd _prefer_ to be able to sign them and scp them from a Fedora box, for various reasons. [19:48] However, I think the path of least resistance is to make a special gpg signing key and use that on my Ubuntu VMs === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [19:50] czajkowski, how's the mongo world treating you [19:53] balor: you can't dput the binary .deb files to a PPA anyway. you can only upload the source package [19:54] but yes, the source must be signed [19:55] dobey, thats dpkg-buildpackage -S I believe. thanks. [19:55] with a valid, non-expired key, which matches the fingerprint specified on your lp profile [19:55] yes [19:55] dobey, much obliged. [20:01] dobey: I left my PPA alone. I uploaded a new version of chromium that supersedes previous version. The old version is still there, and my third upload just failed because of lack of disk space. [20:05] balor: it's good, heading to milan and rome next week for two events I'm running so kept busy [20:06] One architecture of the second upload did fail to build. Could that make the first upload, the version that should be superceded (and is labeled so), not be deleted? [20:07] czajkowski, sweet. Make time in Rome to get to see the Vatican gallery. It's worth the queue. [20:13] qengho: i think one superseded version is kept around, along with the current version. how big is a single package? [20:14] Hrm, about 1GB or so. [20:15] I only juggle elephants. [20:15] qengho: yikes. maybe you should just ask for more disk space in that PPA [20:15] dobey: Roger. Thanks. [20:32] success! I think. [20:35] I presume it takes time for the source deb to be built on the launchpad side before it hits my PPA? [20:36] the source package should be published shortly; binaries will take a little longer, yes [20:37] you should get a mail when the source upload is accepted if it was properly signed [20:37] great :) [20:38] balor: looks like it was rejected though [20:38] ah, you got the PPA name wrong [20:38] I did [20:38] yeah [20:38] I copied the documentation, but my ppa name is different [20:39] and you need an Ubuntu series rather than "unstable" in debian/changelog when you build the package, by the looks of it? [20:39] * cjwatson goes for childcare [20:40] cjwatson, thanks === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch [22:44] I deleted packages from my PPA more than an hour ago. The quota isn't updated to zero yet. https://launchpad.net/~cmiller/+archive/chromium-browser-beta-daily/+packages [22:57] qengho: The package pools are only cleaned every 6 hours, so it can take 12 hours. [22:57] I've doubled your quota. [23:41] wgrant: thank you.