[03:13] <infinity> cjwatson: Erm, what's the heritage of installation-locale/C.UTF-8.in, and why does it try to generate its own instead of just copying /usr/lib/locale/C.UTF-8 from libc-bin?
[03:14] <infinity> (In fact, why do we need it at all, we could just ship /usr/lib/locale/C.UTF-8 in libc-udeb, no?)
[03:16] <infinity> cjwatson: Oh, unless the goal is to provide a cut-down locale that doesn't take as much space, I guess.
[03:38] <infinity> Oh, FFS, XDR was removed.
[04:00] <infinity> cjwatson: Alright, fixed in the next upload, and submitted upstream.
[10:34] <cjwatson> infinity: It does predate C.UTF-8, but I think it's still around to be cut-down, yeah
[12:41] <jibel> xnox, could you have a look at bug 1296697
[12:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1296697 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Trusty Desktop installer crashed with "Encrypted Home" set" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1296697
[16:39] <infinity> cjwatson: Right.  Fixed, at any rate.
[16:41] <cjwatson> infinity: thanks
[17:07] <infinity> xnox: What's the deal with that 38-day-old hw-detect that's blocked in proposed?
[17:08] <infinity> xnox: If that's sane, we probably want it for beta, and if not, we probably want to revert.  Keeping it blocked past beta is just going to lose testing opportunities, though.