/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/03/26/#ubuntu-desktop.txt

=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
GunnarHjHi robert_ancell!00:23
=== jono is now known as Guest43238
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: ping?00:33
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
robert_ancellGunnarHj, hello01:55
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Hi!01:58
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Since you were afk, I posted a comment on bug 1189382.01:59
ubot2Launchpad bug 1189382 in unity-control-center (Ubuntu) "Misleading icons for “Keyboard” and “Text Input”" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/118938201:59
robert_ancellyep, saw that01:59
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Isn't it a little late?02:00
robert_ancellGunnarHj, I didn't actually propose it for merging. Thought I would see how hard it would be to do02:00
robert_ancellThe current state of having them split is a bit insane though02:00
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Basically I agree. And they are already interlinked.02:01
robert_ancellYeah, it was nice to delete those silly links in the branch :)02:02
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: What more exactly would the merged capplet look like? What would the name of it be?02:02
robert_ancellKeyboard02:02
robert_ancellbecause they all relate to the keyboard02:03
robert_ancellI'll attach a screenshot to the bug02:03
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Do IM users look for IBus settings under Keyboard? ;-)02:04
robert_ancellwhy wouldn't they?02:04
robert_ancellAll the other keyboard shortcuts and keyboard behaviours are there02:04
robert_ancellGunnarHj, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/883256/+attachment/4043804/+files/Merged%20keyboard%20capplet.png02:06
ubot2Launchpad bug 883256 in unity-control-center (Ubuntu) "unnecessary separation of keyboard and keyboard layout" [Wishlist,Triaged]02:06
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Maybe you are right. Guess I'm colored by the discussions on the way keyboard layout and input methods were integrated. There was much criticism. And now this last minute change...02:07
robert_ancellIt's just a branch, not a change02:07
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Yeah, personally I think that screenshot looks nice.02:07
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Are you saying that you are not going to propose it for 14.04?02:08
robert_ancellThe other panel that annoys me is a vague "brightness and lock"02:08
robert_ancellI'll see if anyone else thinks it's worth itr02:08
robert_ancelli.e. design / seb02:08
robert_ancellI suspect it would be too late / not high enough priority02:09
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: I'd vote fore too late for 14.04, but personally I'm all for it in 14.10.02:10
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: In any case this shows that the creation of u-c-c opens possibilities to make the UI more sensible. :)02:16
robert_ancellGunnarHj, yes. It's kind of sad it will be obsolete so soon :(02:16
robert_ancellShould have done it years ago02:16
GunnarHjrobert_ancell: Replaced by u-s-s?02:17
robert_ancellyes02:17
=== maclin__ is now known as maclin
=== FJKong_afk is now known as FJKong
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
pittiGood morning05:51
=== duflu_ is now known as duflu
=== jhernand1z is now known as jhernandez
seb128good morning desktopers!09:02
Laneyhey09:06
mlankhorstmorning!09:09
=== maclin_ is now known as maclin
ckingI see that phone convergence code is getting creating some minor regressions on the desktop, for example: bug 1289532, can somebody look into this?09:49
ubot2Launchpad bug 1289532 in network-manager-applet (Ubuntu) "NetworkManager is polling every 4 seconds on the Desktop looking for /var/lib/ofono " [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/128953209:49
seb128cyphermox, ^09:52
seb128cking, thanks for spotting those/pointed them out09:52
ckingno problem, we're making good progress in squashing these kinda issues09:53
SweetsharkMoin!11:20
Sweetsharkseb128: http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/trusty/4.2.3/ and http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/precise/3.5.7/ubuntu6/ have the packages for sponsoring. Since we have the preliminary FFE for LibreOffice, do you need any additional redtape/bureaucracy from me?11:23
seb128Sweetshark, hey, looking11:49
seb128Sweetshark, trusty ones sponsored, looking to precise a bit later12:01
Sweetsharkseb128: aye12:07
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch
ritzseb128, thank you, you are fast12:51
seb128ritz, yw, well that one was already uploaded before, I just don't like regression on done todo items ;-)12:51
ritzhehe :)12:52
=== timmy is now known as Guest60910
Guest60910how can install app from flash drive13:01
Guest60910?13:01
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch
Guest60910how can install app from flash drive?13:04
cyphermoxcking: hey, looking at the NM issue; what were you using to see these wakeups again?13:09
Guest60910how can install app from flash drive?13:09
ckingcyphermox, health-check13:09
davmor2seb128: don't know if you can help me, the keyboard shortcut that is now shown on a first startup from a fresh install.  Is it just unity or a different package?13:09
cyphermoxbecause this is happening as a side-effect of g_file_monitor_directory or something; I'm never calling inotify directly :/13:09
ckingcyphermox, the tool just monitors the system calls, so goodness knows where the real culprit is13:11
ckingi guess gdb is the next best hunch13:11
cyphermoxcking: yeah, no problem; I'll figure out how to unbreak it13:11
seb128davmor2, unity, what's the issue?13:11
davmor2seb128: the clicking on the cross to close it does nothing13:12
cyphermoxI think I could jsut skipping creating that monitor at all if the directory doesn't initially exists, since the function will get called again if ofono eventually appears on the bus13:12
Guest60910how can install app from flash drive?13:14
timmytimtimoi need help?13:17
seb128timmytimtimo, that channel is not an user support one, try #ubuntu13:18
kgunnseb128: ping13:48
seb128kgunn, contentless ping warning13:48
jdstrandseb128: fyi in case you haven't seen it: bug #1288241. Not saying you should treat it special, just want to get it on your radar if it isn't13:57
ubot2Launchpad bug 1288241 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "gnome-screensaver is running twice and prompts twice to unlock" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/128824113:57
jdstrandI guess I could use rls-t-incoming13:58
* jdstrand does so13:58
seb128jdstrand, hey, I saw it, I'm unsure to understand how that can happen though14:00
jdstrandme too, yet, it does14:00
seb128jdstrand, note that there is also bug #129245114:01
ubot2Launchpad bug 1292451 in unity (Ubuntu) "screensaver re-locks itself after unlocking if the configured screen-off timer goes off while screen is locked" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/129245114:01
=== MacSlow|lunch is now known as MacSlow
seb128andyrock is supposed to work on those issues and said he would have a fix on monday, we are still waiting though :/14:01
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g
andyrocki fixed the double lock14:02
andyrockthat's a different issue14:02
* jdstrand notes he has two screensavers running right now14:02
andyrocki mean i proposed a branch14:03
jdstrandmdes laur postulated it could be related to bug 127159114:03
ubot2Launchpad bug 1271591 in gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) "upstart job race prevents gnome-keyring from being ssh agent" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127159114:03
jdstrandie, some sort of upstart race14:03
seb128jdstrand, it could be, because14:03
seb128$ LC_ALL=C gnome-screensaver14:03
seb128** (gnome-screensaver:19175): WARNING **: screensaver already running in this session14:03
seb128and it exit14:04
jdstrandinterestingly, sometimes I have one screensaver, other times two, but I never seem to have 314:04
seb128how are those started14:04
seb128?14:04
seb128do you have a ppid? or are those dbus activated? or...?14:04
seb128but yeah, those upstart race are annoying14:04
jdstrandseb128: I promise I am not lying: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7156861/ :)14:05
seb128I wish somebody from foundation would help there14:05
seb128xnox, stgraber: ^14:05
mdeslaurFYI, I only have it running once, and am getting prompted twice to unlock14:06
seb128mdeslaur, right, that's bug #1292451 and the one andyrock is working on14:07
ubot2Launchpad bug 1292451 in unity (Ubuntu) "screensaver re-locks itself after unlocking if the configured screen-off timer goes off while screen is locked" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/129245114:07
seb128unity and g-s both triggering a lock14:07
mdeslaurah, yes, that looks like it14:07
seb128jdstrand issue is different14:07
seb128he manages to get 2 g-s running14:08
seb128jdstrand, can you get the /proc/$pid/environ for each (and same for the compiz process)14:08
jdstrandwith both, the parent process is 'init --user'14:08
seb128jdstrand, just to see if they have the same bus14:08
seb128hum14:08
seb128so both started by upstart? wth :/14:08
seb128when do we switch to systemd? ;-)14:09
* seb128 hides14:09
jdstrandseb128: UPSTART_SESSION=unix:abstract=/com/ubuntu/upstart-session/1000/257914:11
jdstrandseb128: same for both14:11
ogra_seb128, yeah, will be fun to have to compile all your job descriptions instead of having them in plain text :P14:11
seb128jdstrand, does "initctl --session list" has both pids?14:11
mdeslaurjdstrand: do they both have the same DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS?14:11
* mdeslaur doesn't understand how two can be started when there is code in them to specifically prevent that14:12
seb128I don't know how that is possible, but it seems like an upstart bug to me14:12
jdstrandseb128: "initctl --session list" lists neither pid14:13
mdeslaurme neither14:14
jdstrandmdeslaur: re DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS> *no*14:14
mdeslaurjdstrand:  NO???14:14
seb128so they are started by 'init --user' but not listed by initctl?14:14
mdeslaurjdstrand: how many dbus-daemons are running?14:15
jdstrand$ cat /proc/3033/environ | tr '\0' '\n'|grep DBUS_SESSION14:15
jdstrandDBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-ZUvIbevG83,guid=269ab2f67b14acf19089d23953308de714:15
jdstrand$ cat /proc/3657/environ | tr '\0' '\n'|grep DBUS_SESSION14:15
jdstrandDBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-y9007CBDK2,guid=4a97bdd2ecc021bd3585368753308de814:15
seb128jdstrand, mdeslaur: not having the same DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS seems the only reasonable explanation at why the running instance detection doesn't work14:15
mdeslaurjdstrand: there's your problem, you're getting a screensaver for each dbus, that makes perfect sense14:15
mdeslaurscreensaver is activated by dbus14:15
seb128we are back to bug #1271591 imho14:16
ubot2Launchpad bug 1271591 in gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) "upstart job race prevents gnome-keyring from being ssh agent" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127159114:16
seb128upstart/env issues14:16
jdstrand$ ps auxww | grep [i]nit14:16
jdstrandroot         1  0.0  0.0  34688  3820 ?        Ss   Mar24   0:03 /sbin/init14:16
jdstrandlightdm   1760  0.0  0.0  35592  1328 ?        S    Mar24   0:00 init --user --startup-event indicator-services-start14:16
jdstrandjamie     2579  0.0  0.0  36880  2912 ?        Ss   Mar24   0:07 init --user14:16
mdeslaurjdstrand: ps auxww | grep dbus-daemon14:17
jdstrandyeah, I see know one was for lightdm and the other for me14:17
jdstrands/know/now/14:17
jdstrandhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/7156914/14:18
jdstrandso, system, accessibility, and two sessions started with different args14:18
mdeslaurjdstrand: that's normal14:19
mdeslaurjdstrand: so your /tmp/dbus-y9007CBDK2 dbus daemon is no longer there14:19
seb128clients should exit when the bus goes away no?14:19
mdeslaurseb128: not necessarily14:20
jdstrandmdeslaur: how do you know that //bin/dbus-daemon --fork --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session isn't /tmp/dbus-y9007CBDK2?14:20
seb128jdstrand, check the /proc/pid/environ?14:20
jdstrandseb128: it doesn't have anything for dbus in its environment14:21
jdstrandbut that does have GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL14:22
mdeslaurjdstrand: yeah, that's the one spawned by gnome-keyring14:22
jdstrandoh, both do14:22
mdeslauror maybe somethig else...I dunno, there is _supposed_ to be two in your session + the accessibility one14:22
jdstrandso, 2766 has DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-ZUvIbevG83. 2898 does not14:23
jdstrandand by 'does not' I mean 2898 doesn't have  DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS in the env at all14:24
mdeslaurjdstrand: so you had a /tmp/dbus-y9007CBDK2 at some point, which went away, and you have a hanging screensaver14:24
jdstrandthat seems plausible14:24
jdstrandbut how to prevent that?14:24
mdeslaurjdstrand: do you have an extra file in /etc/X11/Xsession.d?14:25
jdstrandhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/7156950/14:26
mdeslaurwow...a lot of stuff in there that are supposed to be dead14:27
mdeslaurconsolekit?14:27
jdstrandis 75dbus_dbus-launch supposed to be there?14:28
mdeslaurfwiw, this is mine: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7156960/14:28
jdstrandmdeslaur: you never see 2 screensavers?14:29
mdeslaurnope14:29
LaneyAnything which adds something to STARTUP, like 75dbus and 90consolekit, doesn't get used if you are using upstart user sessions14:29
mdeslaurwhat's in 60seahorse*?14:29
mdeslaurLaney: right, possibly something in there isn't using STARTUP and that results in spawning a session dbus14:30
jdstrandhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/7156969/14:30
mdeslaurjdstrand: hrm, try removing 90apparmor-notify and rebooting?14:33
seb128jdstrand, mdeslaur: does that happen in a consistant way on every login?14:33
jdstrandmdeslaur: thinking that notify-osd is the culprit?14:33
seb128jdstrand, mdeslaur: it might be useful to install bootchart and get a chart14:34
jdstrandseb128: no, not every time14:34
mdeslaurjdstrand: yeah, perhaps notify-osd is getting triggered before dbus is up, which spawns it's own14:34
seb128those sometime give a clue about what process trigger what14:34
seb128jdstrand, you don't have it already installed by any chance? ;-)14:34
jdstrandbootchart?14:35
jdstrandno14:36
jdstrandI forget how to enable it14:36
jdstranddo you know otoh?14:36
seb128just install and reboot14:37
seb128it's enabled by default and log to /var/log/bootchart14:37
seb128well, install pybootchartgui14:37
seb128that's needed to get the images I think14:37
mdeslaurjdstrand: apparmor-notify should go in /etc/xdg/autostart14:40
jdstrandmdeslaur: should I just move it there and see if it resolves my issues?14:42
mdeslaurjdstrand: try removing 90apparmor-notify and restarting first14:42
mdeslaurjdstrand: just to see if it's that14:42
jdstrandwell, note, it doesn't happen on every boot14:43
jdstrandwhich is highly annoying14:43
mdeslaurit's probably only happening when you have denials, as that's when notify-osd would spawn before dbus14:43
jdstrandI can trigger a denial14:43
jdstrandgive me a few minutes14:44
mdeslaurin any case, it shouldn't be there as it will definitely cause the problem if the conditions are right14:44
mdeslaurbut there may be more than one problem14:45
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
seb128jdstrand, mdeslaur: the bootchart might still be useful to confirm that14:51
jdstrandmdeslaur: you seem to be right. if I log out, make sure no screensavers are running, then login, only one is running. if I trigger a denial, apparmor-notify gives me a notification and another screensaver is started14:52
mdeslaurjdstrand: yeah, so it needs a desktop file and needs to be moved to /etc/xdg/autostart14:52
jdstrandif I kill the new screensaver, then trigger another denial, then another screensaver starts14:52
seb128shrug14:52
seb128so apparmor-notify is on the wrong environment/bus14:52
mdeslaurseb128: yes, because it's starting before the session bus, so notify-osd is spawning it's own bus14:53
seb128k14:53
seb128I knew it was the security team's fault! :p14:53
seb128mdeslaur, thanks for helping debugging!14:53
jdstrandthis used to work. I wonder if it changed when we moved to upstart user sessions14:55
mdeslaurseb128: yeah, for once it's our fault :)14:55
mdeslaurjdstrand: yes, it used to work because dbus was spawned there14:55
mdeslaurjdstrand: but isn't anymore14:55
jdstrand(it may never have been 'correct', but it didn't use to do this14:55
jdstrand)14:55
jdstrandinteresting14:56
seb128jdstrand, mdeslaur: I guess you are going to deal with the bug/reassign?14:56
jdstrandI will once I confirm the fix14:57
seb128thanks14:57
jdstrandseb128, mdeslaur: thanks for your help with this. it was highly annoying :)14:58
mdeslaurjdstrand: I figure for every thousand times seb blames apparmor, there can be an actual bug once :)14:59
jdstrandheh14:59
jdstrandI would draw a line between apparmor and apparmor-notify :)14:59
Trevinholarsu: hey!15:00
mdeslauralthough seb128 seems to have moved to blaming upstart for everything now, so maybe we'll be ok for a while :)15:00
seb128mdeslaur, lol15:00
larsuTrevinho: hi15:00
mdeslaur;)15:00
Trevinholarsu:  do you know what's causing some apps bg to be black (i..e dejadup) or transparent (gnome-tweak-tool)?15:00
seb128mdeslaur, I'm still annoyed on those gnome-keyring agent being unreliable, should I blame apparmor for it? ;-)15:01
mdeslaurseb128: nice try :)15:01
larsuTrevinho: yes, a combination of backgrounds not being set and overlay-scrollbars15:01
larsuTrevinho: patches welcome *cough*15:01
mdeslaurseb128: you haven't managed to get xnox to fix that yet?15:01
seb128mdeslaur, no :-(15:01
seb128Trevinho, I can't confirm for deja-dup, in what part of the UI?15:01
larsuya, same here15:02
Trevinholarsu: ah.... I don't know what caused it but in previous version of themes it was working...15:02
larsuTrevinho: because we had a css rule "* { background-color: <something> }"15:02
seb128Trevinho, see https://code.launchpad.net/~larsu/ubuntu-themes/dont-set-all-bgs/+merge/197234 for details15:02
larsuTrevinho: setting a bg for all widgets causes other problems. For example, it's very slow15:02
Trevinhoseb128: http://people.ubuntu.com/~3v1n0/shots/Schermata%20da%202014-03-26%2016:02:31.png15:03
seb128Trevinho, urg, I can't confirm that one ... do you have a locally hacked theme?15:03
larsuTrevinho: so I removed that rule and added backgrounds for widgets which were broken due to overlay-scrollbar doing crazy stuff15:03
seb128oh, I can15:03
seb128when showing the details15:03
seb128"fun"15:04
Trevinhoseb128: I have but I'm using the default one I think15:04
TrevinhoI mean, I'm not using the local one now15:05
Trevinhoat least, settings wise15:05
Trevinhoseb128: yaeh, that's on detail15:05
Trevinhoseb128: maybe because it loads overlay scrollbars in that case?15:05
Trevinholarsu: ^15:05
larsuTrevinho: yep, it's very likely this is due to o-s15:06
larsuwe've seen a lot of black bgs because of it15:06
seb128larsu, Trevinho: confirmed, it doesn't happen without those15:07
seb128bug #1295105 btw15:08
ubot2Launchpad bug 1295105 in OEM Priority Project trusty "Wrong background color in "Back Up" window" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/129510515:08
larsuseb128: feel free to assign me to that bug while I'll go curl up into a corner and cry for a while15:08
seb128larsu, :-(15:08
Trevinhoseb128: btw dejadup is never able to finish a backup without errors here.... but that's another story :(15:08
seb128Trevinho, talk to mterry!15:09
* mterry hides15:09
larsuTrevinho: something about not being able to back up some files? I think it backs up anyway except for the files it mentions15:09
* larsu had that one today15:09
seb128mterry, don't hide, larsu is fixed your dejadup bugs!15:09
* mterry hugs larsu15:09
Trevinholarsu: no, it stops doing the backup giving me some python errror... But I never checked it in details15:09
larsuwait, what?!15:09
seb128well, he said he would look at the theme issue15:10
seb128larsu, ^15:10
mterrylarsu, something for upstream/me?15:10
Trevinhoit will be probably back in few time15:10
seb128mterry, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/129510515:10
ubot2Launchpad bug 1295105 in deja-dup (Ubuntu) "Wrong background color in "Back Up" window" [High,Confirmed]15:10
larsumterry: nah, it's a theming issue15:10
Trevinhonot sure if that's because it back ups on u1?15:10
larsuTrevinho: ah okay. I'm backing up to an external hd15:10
Trevinhomterry: ah, is there a way to blacklist a file, inside a folder?15:10
seb128Trevinho, bug #1295357?15:11
ubot2Launchpad bug 1295357 in deja-dup (Ubuntu) "Backup to Ubuntu one failing code 502 upload will exceed quota" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/129535715:11
mterryTrevinho, not one single file, no15:11
Trevinhomterry: ok, np...15:11
Trevinhoseb128: mh, no... it's not that... I've lot of space there15:11
Trevinhoseb128: once i get the log i'll be back with details15:11
seb128k15:11
jdstrandmdeslaur: nice! I moved it over to xdg, logged out, back in, it autostarted, I triggered a denial and only one gnome-screensaver :)15:12
jdstrand\o/15:12
jdstrandseb128: ^15:12
* jdstrand triages and assigns bug to himself15:13
mdeslaurjdstrand: cool!15:13
seb128jdstrand, mdeslaur: great, thanks15:13
jdstrandmdeslaur: so, I guess I've been seeing it a lot more lately since I've been profiling15:13
seb128jdstrand, don't forget to maintscript clean the conffile on upgrade15:13
jdstrandyeah15:13
mdeslauryeah15:13
seb128desrt, hey, did you see bts like that before, https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/f816c2a6a455ee7a2acd17284a395dee22bcc78715:15
desrtyes15:19
desrtthis is the typical 'getenv is not threadsafe, gettext calls getenv, we call gettext from threads' issue15:19
larsumorning desrt :)15:19
desrthi :)15:19
desrtseb128: we generally try to solve this issue by making sure nobody ever calls setenv()15:20
desrtso likely the program that is crashing is calling setenv() somewhere -- it needs to stop doing that15:20
seb128desrt, there is only on thread though here and the call is coming from dconf?15:20
desrtseb128: the call causing the crash is happening from the dconf worker thread...15:21
desrt#25 0xb6e11134 in dconf_context_thread (data=0x83555b8) at dconfcontext.c:1115:21
didrocksTrevinho: I guess no screen off after the timeout in the screenlock is a known issue?15:21
desrtthe main() thread is missing from the trace for some reason15:21
Trevinhodidrocks: yeah15:21
Trevinhodidrocks: I need to fix it asap15:21
didrocksTrevinho: ok, I think you are already aware that the consequence it that you type your password, you see the screen, then it relocks… ;)15:21
Trevinhodidrocks: yeah :)15:22
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|tea
Trevinhodidrocks: it's like: "are you really sure that you're the right guy"? :D15:22
didrocksok, all good, leaving in your capable hands (just noticed that yesterday)15:22
seb128desrt, you are right, thanks15:22
didrocksTrevinho: yeah, with just a short, quick preview!15:22
desrtseb128: there are some setenv calls here15:23
desrtin g-k-d15:23
seb128right15:23
seb128desrt, want to open a bug upstream for us maybe?15:23
desrtbut seem to be mostly in tests, though15:23
seb128desrt, daemon/control/gkd-control-server.c:g_setenv (*e, x, FALSE);15:24
seb128daemon/ssh-agent/gkd-ssh-agent.c:g_setenv ("SSH_AUTH_SOCK", socket_path, TRUE);15:24
seb128daemon/gpg-agent/gkd-gpg-agent.c:g_setenv ("GPG_AGENT_INFO", agent_info, TRUE);15:25
=== alan_g|tea is now known as alan_g
desrtseb128: looks like you have an old version15:25
seb128desrt, that's 3.10.115:25
desrtthese calls are gone in the latest version15:25
seb128desrt, hum?15:25
seb128desrt, https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-keyring/tree/daemon/control/gkd-control-server.c#n15215:25
seb128desrt, they seem to still be there in trunk to me?15:26
desrtah.. so you're right.15:27
desrti didn't catch them because of the subdir15:27
tremdidrocks: hello15:38
seb128trem, hey again15:40
tremseb128: \o/15:40
seb128trem, still not wanting to listen to my recommendation from the other day? ;-)15:40
tremseb128: ask on the chan ?15:40
seb128yes15:40
tremseb128: sorry, I still prefer to avoid it, because it's not a "public" question15:41
seb128trem, stop using the channel then, /query and ask it15:41
tremseb128: just want to say "hello" on the chan before a query15:42
seb128k15:42
seb128hey then ;-)15:42
didrockshey trem15:46
=== gatox is now known as gatox_lunch
Trevinhoanyone using evolution here? As it seems that all the times I try to save attachments it hangs :o16:14
Trevinhoand.... also file-roller does the same when i try to extract from a zip :/16:15
Trevinhowell,  not only zips... any archive16:16
seb128Trevinho, gio issue? get a bt?16:18
Trevinhoseb128: yeah it looks like that... I've to get it16:18
Trevinhoseb128: I was just about to connect to the processes and n ow... no more hanging... :(16:35
Trevinhobut it happened both yestedaay and today (after a reboot)16:35
seb128:-(16:35
seb128k, maybe next time you manage to get a bt16:36
Trevinhoseb128: I hope no.. .I mean I don't want my apps to freeze  :D16:36
ricotzseb128, hi :), did you upload libreoffice 4.2.3~rc2 already?16:55
Laneyricotz: it's in the queue, see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=116:56
ricotzLaney, ah, thanks16:57
ricotzLaney, syncing libosinfo would be nice too16:58
seb128ricotz, what Laney said, was there an issue with it?16:59
Laneyricotz: dunno what it is, please requestsync16:59
ricotzseb128, no issue, i just need to have the sources published to avoid a full-source upload for the backports16:59
ricotzLaney, it is used by e.g. gnome-boxes and debian contains a newer release with fixes17:00
Laneylooking forward to the bug report then ;-)17:01
=== jasoncwarner___ is now known as jasoncwarner
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter
mptcyphermox, mterry: If Ubuntu connected to a Wi-Fi network at the login screen, and that’s the same network that you use in your session, would it still have to disconnect and reconnect when you logged in?17:57
mterrympt, no, connections are managed by a system daemon17:57
mptOh, of course, otherwise Remote Login would fail immediately after you logged in17:58
mptthanks mterry :)17:58
mptHm, I guess that means you can’t disconnect from the current Internet connection while you are logged in remotely18:01
mptOr at least, shouldn’t18:01
mterrympt, :)  probs not -- maybe we were smart and disallowed permission to do so when in such a session?18:02
mterrybut I bet not18:03
mptI have no way of testing that, that I know of18:03
mterryLaney, thanks for updating that 2 year old patch for adding a position property  :)18:10
cyphermoxmterry: I don't think it needed any being smart, as a guest user you may not have permission to do so in the first place18:11
cyphermoxas for remote sessions, if there is a local user with sufficient permissions then yes they can disconnect you18:11
mterrycyphermox, I think you need admin privileges to create new connections, but I *thought* guests could switch to connections that have been used before.  Not sure18:12
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD
=== gatox_lunch is now known as gatox
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
Laneymterry: I saw it was linked to a bug that's tagged to be fixed for trusty :P21:15
Laneythought it was worth a go21:15
mterryLaney, maybe in two more years it'll be fixed21:16
Laneywell, we have some people in the team who could maybe look at it if necessary21:16
stgraberhmm, so Edubuntu beta 2 gets me a black wallpaper rather than our usual one, any idea what's going on?21:24
stgraber(under uniyt)21:24
stgraber*unity21:24
stgraberwe didn't change our artwork package since december so it seems like something desktopy changed21:25
stgraberhmm, not your fault apparently :)21:27
stgraberthe wallpaper is 0 byte large in that image...21:27
LaneyOops21:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!