[04:24] <OvenWerk1> micahg: I figgured it out, no worries. (if the query above hasn't scrolled off the top by the time you read this)
[18:18] <zequence> Not sure yet what this is about, but there are a bunch of packages that aren't building in our package set http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20140307-trusty.html#ubuntustudio
[18:19] <zequence> I haven't had the time to look into "upstream". But, I suppose I might have some time in coming weeks
[18:20] <zequence> OvenWerk1: Yes. It's a nice thing to have in the installer. I have some ideas floating on how to improve that further on, for both the plugin, as well as the installer
[18:21] <zequence> It's not a bad idea to have the same format for both, as both are in their own way Ubuntu Studio installers
[19:44] <OvenWerk1> zequence: Just in our PPA? Maybe delete the latest one that has built.
[19:46] <zequence> OvenWerk1: No, those are, I think, packages trying to build in Ubuntu
[19:47] <zequence> Becoming project lead didn't come with a handbook, and there's no docs for flavor devs particularly, so there are loads of stuff I'm not aware of
[19:48] <zequence> We haven't done any package maintenance at all so far - in our package set (which is a standard that is being used between flavors - we have a set of packages in universe in a Ubuntu Studio package set)
[19:48] <zequence> ..not counting our own sources of course
[19:49] <zequence> so far, I think all we've done inside the Ubuntu Studio team is the two SRU bugs I did. There is a guy in the mail list, who came along and did some work too