=== ara is now known as Guest11257 === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant === ara_ is now known as ara [15:58] hiya [15:59] in #ubuntu-touch the upstream for trojitá just mentioned the following bugs: [15:59] dholbach: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68056 , https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTCREATORBUG-9978 , https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32760 [15:59] Freedesktop bug 68056 in General "Fails to compile czech(qwerty) keyboard" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] [15:59] dholbach: tag 0.4.1 is OK, 0.4.0 doesn't contain that fix, unfortunately [15:59] that's about libxkbcommon bringing problems on the desktop [16:00] mlankhorst, ^ do you know anything about the issue and if we plan to fix it in trusty? [16:00] dholbach: you might want to ask the Qt guys about that library; my impression is that given it's a pretty new stuff and AFAIK nobody but Qt5 uses it, the old releases might be rather buggy [16:01] or tjaalton ^ [16:01] dholbach: being sick cant look today ( [16:01] mlankhorst, man... all the best - better take some rest! [16:02] * dholbach hugs mlankhorst [16:02] hugs [16:02] so why not upload the newer version then :P [16:02] well, I'm no an expert [16:02] I just tried to bring people in touch about it :) [16:04] if it's n debian we could sync [16:05] debian has 0.4.0 [16:05] we have 0.3.1 [16:06] 0.4.1 seems to be the one which is good enough [16:10] mlankhorst, tjaalton: it looks like we could easily update the package to a newer version (just from a build perspective, etc.) - I just not sure what an impact it would have, if it would solve the bug - so I'd rather defer to some experts [16:10] pushed 0.4.1 to debian git [16:10] yeehaw [16:13] adds a new binary though which needs someone to poke through NEW if it's synced [16:13] testing the build now [16:16] builds [16:27] thanks a lot tjaalton [16:28] so it needs a sponsor to upload to debian, or I could upload it directly to trusty.. but it would need a FFe [16:29] both cases do [16:30] tjaalton, does the upload look generally harmless? or is it something we'd want in trusty? [16:33] well it's been in debian for two months [16:34] 0.4.0 that is [16:34] .1 is a bugfix release [16:34] that sounds good then [16:34] so mir depends on it [16:34] I'd rather hear from them before uploading :) [16:35] tjaalton, ok... to whom should I send a mail about this? [16:35] kgunn probably? [16:36] well maybe mir-devel to reach them all [16:36] true [16:36] RAOF is zzz right now [16:37] i'll push it to a ppa [16:37] fair enough [16:37] will appear here in a bit https://launchpad.net/~tjaalton/+archive/test [16:40] mail sent [16:41] tjaalton, thanks again [16:41] np [16:42] another option would be to pull that sha, but it's a fairly big one