=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === fginther` is now known as fginther [06:58] good morning [07:03] good morning [09:16] does xvfb-run work with autopilot? is there anything special i need to do to make it work? [09:21] brendand, it works, make sure the color depth is 24 by default it is 8 [09:21] something -s "screen 0 1024x768x24" [09:22] -s "-screen 0 1024x768x24" [09:22] even [09:23] jibel, interesting - any idea why that needs to be? [09:25] brendand, I don't remember the details, but mesa doesn't load with lower depth I believe. It is not required by AP itself though but by the apps that use opengl [09:27] jibel, that makes sense [09:27] jibel, thanks [09:28] brendand: GL, and thus also the software emulation, only works with 24 bpp [09:28] brendand: I doubt that with 8 bpp a real graphics card would behave (but I'm not sure) [09:28] brendand: that 8bpp default in 2014 is a bit unfortunate indeed [09:29] brendand: btw, you should look at autopilot-sandbox-run [09:29] brendand: that gets all those gory details right, and is quite convenient; it also supports Xephyr, if you want to see what's actually going on [09:29] pitti, yeah i didn't know xvfb run defaults to 8bpp [09:30] pitti, oh that's very handy :) === zequence_ is now known as zequence [10:00] xnox, I trying to reproduce bug 1302694 [10:00] bug 1302694 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubi-partman fails with error code 141 during install (14.04 beta 2)" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1302694 [10:00] xnox, do you know where parted_server get the label from? [10:01] xnox, I've set a label with mkfs and ntfslabel, the label is set but nothing displayed in partman output [10:03] jibel: parted logs show labels, and e.g. in ubiquity you should see labels in 'Something else..." advance partitioning table, ditto in d-i. [10:04] jibel: also since it's unicode characters on an ntfs partition, I guess they are in UTF-16 rather than UTF-8. But i guess the bug should be reproducible with either. [10:06] xnox, so if I set a label with 'ntfslabel /dev/sdb1 Données' for example, I should see it in the advanced partitioner and partman log, right? [10:08] yeap. [10:08] well, I don't see it :) [10:10] elfy, about bug 1303268 [10:10] bug 1303268 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "Grub instal dev/sda Fatal Error" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1303268 [10:10] elfy, what was the setup of your system before the installation [10:10] and the crash [10:10] hi jibel - not sure what was going on yesterday with that - works fine with todays zsynced image [10:11] I've never needed to do anything other than install it - I've never used EFI installs [10:12] and I know I didn't choose the UEFI option from the f12 boot list [10:12] elfy, okay, there seems to be something wrong, we receive lot of bugs on EFI system with this error, and they cannot all be user errors. Or if they are it is a UI bug [10:13] yep - agreed, if I'd done this once and reported it then wandered off I'd put it down to user error - but this wasn't like that at all :) [10:14] jibel: I use unetbootin and haven't had this error at all previously [10:15] Morning all [10:15] elfy, was there another OS installed on this machine? [10:15] morning davmor2 [10:15] good morning davmor2 [10:15] jibel: yea - this instance of xubuntu [10:15] jibel: RC week right? [10:15] elfy, 32 or 64bit? [10:15] 64bit [10:16] davmor2: it is RC week indeed [10:18] jibel: as I happen to have a uefi box sat here in front of me is there something you'd like me to test? I'm just syncing images currently [10:21] davmor2, there are tons of reports lately where installation fails in grub because people seems to have booted there system in EFI mode but disks are not configured for EFI [10:21] davmor2, actually far too many of them to be a simple user error [10:21] davmor2, eg bug 1299134, bug 1303268, ... [10:21] bug 1299134 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "grub-installer failed during install trusty 64bit" [Critical,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1299134 [10:21] bug 1303268 in grub-installer (Ubuntu) "Grub instal dev/sda Fatal Error" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1303268 [10:22] I'm quite good with pebkac at times - this definitely wasn't one of them ;) [10:22] davmor2, but I cannot find a valid test case. In every case there is always another OS installed prior to installation [10:23] doanac, but I fail at finding a valid test case. It could be on systems with Windows 8 preinstalled for example [10:23] doanac, sorry [10:24] davmor2, I found that lot of these systems have ntfs partitions for example, other have other linux distribution like elementary os [10:25] jibel: I have a windows box I can install side by side with give me an hour to make sure I have everything updated, burn the dvd and I'll install against that (WIN7) [10:34] davmor2, this box support efi? [10:36] the only efi box I have here is my main laptop, and I don't really fancy installing windows 8 on it :) [10:36] jibel: no this is just a bios box, which I believe is the case for the first bug I can get windows 8 back on laptop that has uefi but that will take a lot longer [11:08] jibel: on the install or live cd session, if you leave the device with no interaction for a small amount of time do you get real lag till the system wakes again? [11:08] \o/ system crashed [11:09] jibel: is that not more of a /o\ [11:09] davmor2, I rarely leave it time to rest, but I'll try [11:12] jibel: I only had to while it was repartitioning the win7 partition so I got on with finishing off a phone test in the meantime and then came back to it :) [11:12] davmor2, no it is a \o/. I think I found another UEFI crash. I you install Ubuntu on a 2nd drive and 1rst drive has not EFI Partition then ubiquity crashes [11:12] s/I/If/ [11:13] sadtrombone.com [11:13] which is the case if drive 1 has no OS at all [11:34] jibel: so install against win7 on a standard bios based box hax just worked no issues [11:34] jibel: that's on the latest image [11:36] jibel: I ony have WIN8 to install against my main laptop and that will prevent me from booting into windows 8 if I change uefi to bios mode [11:40] jibel: would it help if I tried to install in uefi mode here deliberately? [11:49] davmor2, you don't have to switch to bios mode, I don't think people deliberately switch to bios or uefi, most of them don't even know what it is [11:51] jibel: I think you'll find that if it is a build it yourself then it comes in bios mode, if it is a prebuilt then it comes in uefi mode normally with secureboot I'll have a play after Lunch anyway. [12:34] jibel: right back from lunch win8 installing [12:36] jibel: man I forgot how slow windows is to install :( === _salem is now known as salem_ [14:26] jibel: still no issues but my god how long does it take to install WIN8 [14:29] jibel: Although I did have to partition manually :) === brendand_ is now known as brendand === shuduo is now known as shuduo_afk === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === alex_abreu is now known as alex-abrey === alex-abrey is now known as alex-abreu === spineau1 is now known as spineau_afk === bfiller is now known as bfiller_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === bfiller_afk is now known as bfiller [19:09] elopio, hello [19:36] Letozaf_: hi, how are you? [19:36] elopio, hi fine and you ? [19:36] good too. [19:37] elopio, I got a mp for you to look at [19:37] :) [19:37] elopio, I am having problems getting two properties [19:37] elopio, I have tried various solutions but nothing seems to work [19:37] Letozaf_: is that on the rss? [19:38] elopio, yes lp:~carla-sella/ubuntu-rssreader-app/open_feed_test [19:38] elopio, the mp: https://code.launchpad.net/~carla-sella/ubuntu-rssreader-app/open_feed_test/+merge/214598 [19:40] Letozaf_: it's objectName, with a lower case o. [19:40] elopio, nooo I have been going mad on this :P thanks, sorry but I really did not see the error :( [19:41] Letozaf_: don't worry, that happens all the time. [19:41] elopio, :P [19:41] that's why we have reviewers, we always need a different pair of eyes. [19:42] Letozaf_: I will try to review your branch in detail today, but more probably tomorrow. [19:42] elopio, thanks meanwhile I will fix it a bit [19:42] thanks to you. [19:43] elfy, :D my pleasure [19:43] elfy, sorry I meant elopio [19:43] you are welcome :) [19:44] elfy, lol you got nicknames so similar :P [19:44] blame forestpiskie :D [19:45] elfy, and forestpiskie are supposed to be the same person ? :P [19:46] Letozaf_: don't believe a word that elfy says - he's the same as hobgoblin :p [19:49] forestpiskie, elfy :? [19:51] Letozaf_: I am the same person as forestpiskie - and hobgoblin when he's about [19:52] elfy, lol sort of knew it but wasn't sure :P [19:52] :) [19:52] /whois will tell you :) [19:52] elfy, :D [19:53] elfy, yeah [19:54] :) === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha === spineau_afk is now known as spineau [21:25] alesage: review, please: [21:25] https://code.launchpad.net/~elopio/unity8/use_fake_instead_of_messaging/+merge/214615 [21:25] elopio, ok === ubot5` is now known as ubot5 === fginther is now known as fginther|away === salem_ is now known as _salem === _salem is now known as salem_ === salem_ is now known as _salem